Forecasting U.S. Tornado Outbreak Activity and Associated Environments in the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS)

Kelsey Malloy Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Kelsey Malloy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-7490
and
Michael K. Tippett Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Michael K. Tippett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Tornado outbreaks are high-impact events, often causing significant loss of life and property. This study evaluated the forecast skill of U.S. tornado outbreak activity using the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS), version 12, at lead times up to 2 weeks. Tornado outbreak activity is represented in GEFS using an outbreak index, which relates the likelihood of outbreak-level tornadoes to GEFS forecasts of convective precipitation (CP), storm-relative helicity (SRH), and convective available potential energy (CAPE). GEFS forecasts of the outbreak index are verified against smoothed Storm Prediction Center report data. Since the performance of the outbreak index depends on how well GEFS predicts the index constituents, we also evaluated the climatology and forecast skill of CP, SRH, and CAPE, as well as their covariability. We found that GEFS has a systematic low-CAPE bias and that the forecast skill of the outbreak index is most limited by GEFS forecast skill of CP. We corrected the low-CAPE bias and index seasonality errors via a seasonally and regionally dependent scaling of CAPE and the index, which improved the seasonal cycle and forecast skill of CAPE and tornado outbreak activity in GEFS. Overall, on average, GEFS has its highest forecast skill of tornado outbreak activity during winter and spring—in some cases, positive skill extends beyond week 1 forecast leads—and has its lowest forecast skill during summer.

Significance Statement

Tornado outbreaks—when multiple tornadoes occur over a short time span—are one of the most extreme forms of severe convective storms. Individual tornadoes are typically regarded as unpredictable except at very short lead times, but broad tornado activity or likelihood might be predictable past the weather time scale (a week or more in advance). We evaluated the forecast skill of U.S. tornado outbreak activity as well as the forecast skill of environmental conditions relevant to the favorability of tornado outbreaks in a state-of-the-art forecast model. We found that one environmental condition that describes storm instability or “fuel”—convective available potential energy—is often too low in the forecast model. We also found that tornado outbreak activity as represented by model environmental conditions has seasonal cycle errors. After correcting for these issues, we determined that the forecast skill of tornado outbreak activity is highest in winter–spring and is lowest in summer. Overall, winter, spring, and fall forecasts of U.S.-wide tornado outbreak activity are skillful past the weather time scale.

Malloy’s current affiliation: Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Kelsey Malloy, kmmalloy@udel.edu

Abstract

Tornado outbreaks are high-impact events, often causing significant loss of life and property. This study evaluated the forecast skill of U.S. tornado outbreak activity using the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS), version 12, at lead times up to 2 weeks. Tornado outbreak activity is represented in GEFS using an outbreak index, which relates the likelihood of outbreak-level tornadoes to GEFS forecasts of convective precipitation (CP), storm-relative helicity (SRH), and convective available potential energy (CAPE). GEFS forecasts of the outbreak index are verified against smoothed Storm Prediction Center report data. Since the performance of the outbreak index depends on how well GEFS predicts the index constituents, we also evaluated the climatology and forecast skill of CP, SRH, and CAPE, as well as their covariability. We found that GEFS has a systematic low-CAPE bias and that the forecast skill of the outbreak index is most limited by GEFS forecast skill of CP. We corrected the low-CAPE bias and index seasonality errors via a seasonally and regionally dependent scaling of CAPE and the index, which improved the seasonal cycle and forecast skill of CAPE and tornado outbreak activity in GEFS. Overall, on average, GEFS has its highest forecast skill of tornado outbreak activity during winter and spring—in some cases, positive skill extends beyond week 1 forecast leads—and has its lowest forecast skill during summer.

Significance Statement

Tornado outbreaks—when multiple tornadoes occur over a short time span—are one of the most extreme forms of severe convective storms. Individual tornadoes are typically regarded as unpredictable except at very short lead times, but broad tornado activity or likelihood might be predictable past the weather time scale (a week or more in advance). We evaluated the forecast skill of U.S. tornado outbreak activity as well as the forecast skill of environmental conditions relevant to the favorability of tornado outbreaks in a state-of-the-art forecast model. We found that one environmental condition that describes storm instability or “fuel”—convective available potential energy—is often too low in the forecast model. We also found that tornado outbreak activity as represented by model environmental conditions has seasonal cycle errors. After correcting for these issues, we determined that the forecast skill of tornado outbreak activity is highest in winter–spring and is lowest in summer. Overall, winter, spring, and fall forecasts of U.S.-wide tornado outbreak activity are skillful past the weather time scale.

Malloy’s current affiliation: Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Kelsey Malloy, kmmalloy@udel.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 1.6868 MB)
Save
  • Battaglioli, F., P. Groenemeijer, I. Tsonevsky, and T. Púčik, 2023: Forecasting large hail and lightning using additive logistic regression models and the ECMWF reforecasts. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 36513669, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3651-2023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and J. Cooper, 1994: On the environments of tornadic and nontornadic mesocyclones. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 606618, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0606:OTEOTA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brooks, H. E., J. W. Lee, and J. P. Craven, 2003: The spatial distribution of severe thunderstorm and tornado environments from global reanalysis data. Atmos. Res., 67–68, 7394, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00045-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carbin, G. W., M. K. Tippett, S. P. Lillo, and H. E. Brooks, 2016: Visualizing long-range severe thunderstorm environment guidance from CFSv2. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 10211031, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00136.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doswell, C. A., III, R. Edwards, R. L. Thompson, J. A. Hart, and K. C. Crosbie, 2006: A simple and flexible method for ranking severe weather events. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 939951, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF959.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuhrmann, C. M., C. E. Konrad, M. M. Kovach, J. T. McLeod, W. G. Schmitz, and P. G. Dixon, 2014: Ranking of tornado outbreaks across the United States and their climatological characteristics. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 684701, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00128.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gallo, B. T., A. J. Clark, and S. R. Dembek, 2016: Forecasting tornadoes using convection-permitting ensembles. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 273295, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0134.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gensini, V. A., and M. K. Tippett, 2019: Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) predictions of days 1–15 U.S. tornado and hail frequencies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 29222930, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gensini, V. A., A. M. Haberlie, and P. T. Marsh, 2020: Practically perfect hindcasts of severe convective storms. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 101, E1259E1278, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0321.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guan, H., and Coauthors, 2022: GEFSv12 reforecast dataset for supporting subseasonal and hydrometeorological applications. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 647665, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0245.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hart, J. A., and A. E. Cohen, 2016: The challenge of forecasting significant tornadoes from June to October using convective parameters. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 20752084, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0005.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herman, G. R., E. R. Nielsen, and R. S. Schumacher, 2018: Probabilistic verification of Storm Prediction Center convective outlooks. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 161184, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0104.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, A. J., G. R. Herman, and R. S. Schumacher, 2020: Forecasting severe weather with random forests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 21352161, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0344.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, A. J., R. S. Schumacher, and I. L. Jirak, 2023: A new paradigm for medium-range severe weather forecasts: Probabilistic random forest–based predictions. Wea. Forecasting, 38, 251272, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0143.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hitchens, N. M., and H. E. Brooks, 2012: Evaluation of the Storm Prediction Center’s day 1 convective outlooks. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 15801585, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00061.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hitchens, N. M., and H. E. Brooks, 2014: Evaluation of the Storm Prediction Center’s convective outlooks from day 3 through day 1. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 11341142, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00132.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hitchens, N. M., H. E. Brooks, and M. P. Kay, 2013: Objective limits on forecasting skill of rare events. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 525534, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00113.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, D., S.-K. Lee, H. Lopez, J.-H. Jeong, and J.-S. Hong, 2024: An unusually prolonged Pacific-North American pattern promoted the 2021 winter Quad-State Tornado Outbreaks. npj Climate Atmos. Sci., 7, 133, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00688-0.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koch, E., J. Koh, A. C. Davison, C. Lepore, and M. K. Tippett, 2021: Trends in the extremes of environments associated with severe U.S. thunderstorms. J. Climate, 34, 12591272, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0826.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, S.-K., H. Lopez, D. Kim, A. T. Wittenberg, and A. Kumar, 2021: A Seasonal Probabilistic Outlook for Tornadoes (SPOTter) in the contiguous United States based on the leading patterns of large-scale atmospheric anomalies. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 901919, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0223.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lepore, C., M. K. Tippett, and J. T. Allen, 2017: ENSO-based probabilistic forecasts of March–May U.S. tornado and hail activity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 90939101, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lepore, C., M. K. Tippett, and J. T. Allen, 2018: CFSv2 monthly forecasts of tornado and hail activity. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 12831297, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0054.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malloy, K., and M. K. Tippett, 2024: A stochastic statistical model for U.S. outbreak-level tornado occurrence based on the large-scale environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 152, 11411161, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-23-0219.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, D. E., and V. A. Gensini, 2023: GEFSv12 high- and low-skill day-10 tornado forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 38, 11951207, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0122.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murugavel, P., S. D. Pawar, and V. Gopalakrishnan, 2012: Trends of Convective Available Potential Energy over the Indian region and its effect on rainfall. Int. J. Climatol., 32, 13621372, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2359.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rädler, A. T., P. Groenemeijer, E. Faust, and R. Sausen, 2018: Detecting severe weather trends using an Additive Regressive Convective Hazard Model (AR-CHaMo). J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 57, 569587, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0132.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rädler, A. T., P. H. Groenemeijer, E. Faust, R. Sausen, and T. Púčik, 2019: Frequency of severe thunderstorms across Europe expected to increase in the 21st century due to rising instability. npj Climate Atmos. Sci., 2, 30, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0083-7.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, B. T., R. L. Thompson, J. S. Grams, C. Broyles, and H. E. Brooks, 2012: Convective modes for significant severe thunderstorms in the contiguous United States. Part I: Storm classification and climatology. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 11141135, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-11-00115.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sobash, R. A., C. S. Schwartz, G. S. Romine, K. R. Fossell, and M. L. Weisman, 2016: Severe weather prediction using storm surrogates from an ensemble forecasting system. Wea. Forecasting, 31, 255271, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0138.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sobash, R. A., G. S. Romine, and C. S. Schwartz, 2020: A comparison of neural-network and surrogate-severe probabilistic convective hazard guidance derived from a convection-allowing model. Wea. Forecasting, 35, 19812000, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0036.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sun, X., D. Heinzeller, L. Bernardet, L. Pan, W. Li, D. Turner, and J. Brown, 2024: A case study investigating the low summertime CAPE behavior in the Global Forecast System. Wea. Forecasting, 39, 317, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0208.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tallapragada, V., 2022: Implementation of Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv12) as the first UFS medium range and sub-seasonal weather application. UFS Webinar Series, 82 pp., https://www.ufs.epic.noaa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Tallapragada_UFS_Webinar_GEFS-v12_052120.pdf.

  • Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 12431261, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<1243:CPSWSE>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tippett, M. K., and C. Lepore, 2021: ENSO-based predictability of a regional severe thunderstorm index. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094907, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tippett, M. K., C. Lepore, and M. L. L’Heureux, 2022: Predictability of a tornado environment index from El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Arctic Oscillation. Wea. Climate Dyn., 3, 10631075, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1063-2022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tippett, M. K., K. Malloy, and S. H. Lee, 2024: Modulation of U.S. tornado activity by year-round North American weather regimes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 152, 21892202, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-24-0016.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tsonevsky, I., C. A. Doswell III, and H. E. Brooks, 2018: Early warnings of severe convection using the ECMWF extreme forecast index. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 857871, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0030.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, H., A. Kumar, A. Diawara, D. DeWitt, and J. Gottschalck, 2021: Dynamical–statistical prediction of week-2 severe weather for the United States. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 109125, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0009.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 622 622 379
PDF Downloads 294 294 167