Cell Mergers, Boundary Interactions, and Convective Systems in Cases of Significant Tornadoes and Hail

Cameron J. Nixon 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, USA

Search for other papers by Cameron J. Nixon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John T. Allen 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, USA

Search for other papers by John T. Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew B. Wilson 2Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

Search for other papers by Matthew B. Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew J. Bunkers 3NOAA/National Weather Service, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA

Search for other papers by Matthew J. Bunkers in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Mateusz Taszarek 4Department of Meteorology and Climatology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland

Search for other papers by Mateusz Taszarek in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Though discrete supercells are usually emphasized in severe weather forecasting, hazard production is often preceded by their interaction with external features. Past studies have examined the impacts of cell mergers, boundaries, other supercells, convective systems, etc., but usually in isolation. Here, we investigate 230 significant tornadoes, 246 significant hail events, and 191 null cases across the United States using WSR-88D data. We find that in over 90% of cases, supercells that produced significant hazards were accompanied by external features. These features varied between hazards; for example, hailstorms were more frequently near boundaries than tornadic storms. That said, the positions of these features with respect to the storm (and storm-relative inflow) distinguished between hazard potential and type. For example, tornadic storms were predominantly on the more-unstable side of a boundary, while non-tornadic storms and hailstorms were on the less-unstable side. Similarly, tornadic storms had more cells in their rear flanks than forward flanks, while hailstorms had more cells in their forward flanks than rear flanks. Although these conditions were observed regardless of the background environment, they were affected by certain variables in the vertical profile, especially in tornadic cases. Namely, when storm-relative inflow was stronger and lifting condensation level (LCL) was lower, tornadic storms were accompanied by more rear-flank cells that were closer to the storm, more directly opposite the storm-relative inflow, for a longer period of time. We propose that these interactions likely modulate hazard potential, in ways that are not accounted for in traditional environmental parameter-based forecasting.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Brooks Hall 301, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, 48858, USA. Email: cameron.nixon@cmich.edu

Abstract

Though discrete supercells are usually emphasized in severe weather forecasting, hazard production is often preceded by their interaction with external features. Past studies have examined the impacts of cell mergers, boundaries, other supercells, convective systems, etc., but usually in isolation. Here, we investigate 230 significant tornadoes, 246 significant hail events, and 191 null cases across the United States using WSR-88D data. We find that in over 90% of cases, supercells that produced significant hazards were accompanied by external features. These features varied between hazards; for example, hailstorms were more frequently near boundaries than tornadic storms. That said, the positions of these features with respect to the storm (and storm-relative inflow) distinguished between hazard potential and type. For example, tornadic storms were predominantly on the more-unstable side of a boundary, while non-tornadic storms and hailstorms were on the less-unstable side. Similarly, tornadic storms had more cells in their rear flanks than forward flanks, while hailstorms had more cells in their forward flanks than rear flanks. Although these conditions were observed regardless of the background environment, they were affected by certain variables in the vertical profile, especially in tornadic cases. Namely, when storm-relative inflow was stronger and lifting condensation level (LCL) was lower, tornadic storms were accompanied by more rear-flank cells that were closer to the storm, more directly opposite the storm-relative inflow, for a longer period of time. We propose that these interactions likely modulate hazard potential, in ways that are not accounted for in traditional environmental parameter-based forecasting.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Brooks Hall 301, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, 48858, USA. Email: cameron.nixon@cmich.edu
Save