Browse
Abstract
Hurricane Ian made landfall along Florida’s west coast at 1905 UTC 28 September 2022 near the Fort Myers area as a high-impact storm. Here, we examine the potential link between track forecast errors near the time of landfall and errors in both the synoptic-scale upper-level flow and a shortwave moving within that flow. Five days before the actual landfall (0000 UTC 23 September), most model guidance indicated landfall would occur close to where Ian eventually came ashore. But by 0000 UTC 25 September, model forecasts were all forecasting landfall in the Florida Panhandle. One day later, the models again agreed with each other but for a landfall 100–200 km north of Tampa, Florida. By 0000 UTC 27 September, forecast models indicated landfall would occur near Tampa. Model forecasts continued shifting to the right and finally converged on Punta Gorda, Florida, as the landfall location, less than 24 h before landfall. In this short article, we hypothesize that the track of Ian depended on subtle interactions with an extratropical wave in the middle and upper atmosphere. Deterministic and ensemble model forecasts reveal that the interactions were very sensitive to the characteristics of this wave and the synoptic-scale flow in which the wave was embedded. A 1–2-dam difference in the geopotential heights played a major role in whether Ian moved north into the Panhandle or toward the east, making landfall in central Florida.
Significance Statement
The purpose of this work is to look at possible causes of error in forecasts of Hurricane Ian’s landfall with the intent of saving lives and reducing damage, which can run to the billions of dollars. The path that hurricanes take is strongly influenced by the larger-scale weather patterns around them. We find that small errors in the upper-level flow patterns north of the hurricane appear to have played an important role in the forecast. These errors were present in both the general flow and a wave moving through that flow, resulting in small but significant changes to the forecast path. Understanding the cause of forecast errors is a key step both in improving forecasts and in identifying types of events that are more difficult to forecast.
Abstract
Hurricane Ian made landfall along Florida’s west coast at 1905 UTC 28 September 2022 near the Fort Myers area as a high-impact storm. Here, we examine the potential link between track forecast errors near the time of landfall and errors in both the synoptic-scale upper-level flow and a shortwave moving within that flow. Five days before the actual landfall (0000 UTC 23 September), most model guidance indicated landfall would occur close to where Ian eventually came ashore. But by 0000 UTC 25 September, model forecasts were all forecasting landfall in the Florida Panhandle. One day later, the models again agreed with each other but for a landfall 100–200 km north of Tampa, Florida. By 0000 UTC 27 September, forecast models indicated landfall would occur near Tampa. Model forecasts continued shifting to the right and finally converged on Punta Gorda, Florida, as the landfall location, less than 24 h before landfall. In this short article, we hypothesize that the track of Ian depended on subtle interactions with an extratropical wave in the middle and upper atmosphere. Deterministic and ensemble model forecasts reveal that the interactions were very sensitive to the characteristics of this wave and the synoptic-scale flow in which the wave was embedded. A 1–2-dam difference in the geopotential heights played a major role in whether Ian moved north into the Panhandle or toward the east, making landfall in central Florida.
Significance Statement
The purpose of this work is to look at possible causes of error in forecasts of Hurricane Ian’s landfall with the intent of saving lives and reducing damage, which can run to the billions of dollars. The path that hurricanes take is strongly influenced by the larger-scale weather patterns around them. We find that small errors in the upper-level flow patterns north of the hurricane appear to have played an important role in the forecast. These errors were present in both the general flow and a wave moving through that flow, resulting in small but significant changes to the forecast path. Understanding the cause of forecast errors is a key step both in improving forecasts and in identifying types of events that are more difficult to forecast.
Abstract
Numerical weather prediction (NWP), when accessible, is a crucial input to short-term solar power forecasting. WRF-Solar, the first NWP model specifically designed for solar energy applications, has shown promising predictive capability. Nevertheless, few attempts have been made to investigate its performance under high aerosol loading, which attenuates incoming radiation significantly. The North China Plain is a polluted region due to industrialization, which constitutes a proper testbed for such investigation. In this paper, aerosol direct radiative effect (DRE) on three surface shortwave radiation components (i.e., global, beam, and diffuse) during five heavy pollution episodes is studied within the WRF-Solar framework. Results show that WRF-Solar overestimates instantaneous beam radiation up to 795.3 W m−2 when the aerosol DRE is not considered. Although such overestimation can be partially offset by an underestimation of the diffuse radiation of about 194.5 W m−2, the overestimation of the global radiation still reaches 160.2 W m−2. This undesirable bias can be reduced when WRF-Solar is powered by Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) aerosol forecasts, which then translates to accuracy improvements in photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts. This work also compares the forecast performance of the CAMS-powered WRF-Solar with that of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model. Under high aerosol loading conditions, the irradiance forecast accuracy generated by WRF-Solar increased by 53.2% and the PV power forecast accuracy increased by 6.8%.
Significance Statement
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) is the “go-to” approach for achieving high-performance day-ahead solar power forecasting. Integrating time-varying aerosol forecasts into NWP models effectively captures aerosol direct radiation effects, thereby enhancing the accuracy of solar irradiance forecasts in heavily polluted regions. This work not only quantifies the aerosol effects on global, beam, and diffuse irradiance but also reveals the physical mechanisms of irradiance-to-power conversion by constructing a model chain. Using the North China Plain as a testbed, the performance of WRF-Solar on solar power forecasting on five severe pollution days is analyzed. This version of WRF-Solar can outperform the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model, confirming the need for generating high spatial–temporal NWP.
Abstract
Numerical weather prediction (NWP), when accessible, is a crucial input to short-term solar power forecasting. WRF-Solar, the first NWP model specifically designed for solar energy applications, has shown promising predictive capability. Nevertheless, few attempts have been made to investigate its performance under high aerosol loading, which attenuates incoming radiation significantly. The North China Plain is a polluted region due to industrialization, which constitutes a proper testbed for such investigation. In this paper, aerosol direct radiative effect (DRE) on three surface shortwave radiation components (i.e., global, beam, and diffuse) during five heavy pollution episodes is studied within the WRF-Solar framework. Results show that WRF-Solar overestimates instantaneous beam radiation up to 795.3 W m−2 when the aerosol DRE is not considered. Although such overestimation can be partially offset by an underestimation of the diffuse radiation of about 194.5 W m−2, the overestimation of the global radiation still reaches 160.2 W m−2. This undesirable bias can be reduced when WRF-Solar is powered by Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) aerosol forecasts, which then translates to accuracy improvements in photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts. This work also compares the forecast performance of the CAMS-powered WRF-Solar with that of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model. Under high aerosol loading conditions, the irradiance forecast accuracy generated by WRF-Solar increased by 53.2% and the PV power forecast accuracy increased by 6.8%.
Significance Statement
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) is the “go-to” approach for achieving high-performance day-ahead solar power forecasting. Integrating time-varying aerosol forecasts into NWP models effectively captures aerosol direct radiation effects, thereby enhancing the accuracy of solar irradiance forecasts in heavily polluted regions. This work not only quantifies the aerosol effects on global, beam, and diffuse irradiance but also reveals the physical mechanisms of irradiance-to-power conversion by constructing a model chain. Using the North China Plain as a testbed, the performance of WRF-Solar on solar power forecasting on five severe pollution days is analyzed. This version of WRF-Solar can outperform the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts model, confirming the need for generating high spatial–temporal NWP.
Abstract
The first version of the Taiwan Central Weather Bureau one-tier (TCWB1T) fully coupled global atmospheric and oceanic modeling forecast system had been developed and implemented as a routine operation for seasonal prediction at Central Weather Bureau (CWB) in 2017, with a minor revision in 2020. Based on NCEP CFSv1, the global atmospheric model in NCEP CFSv1 was replaced by CWB’s atmospheric global spectral model (GSM) and coupled with the GFDL MOM3. Several parameters have been tested and tuned in the CWB atmospheric GSM, achieving an optimal configuration with better sea surface temperature (SST) predictions for integration more than one year. Using NCEP CFSR as the initial condition, TCWB1T conducted hindcasts from 1982 to 2011 and forecasts from 2012 to 2019 to analyze its performance. The results of these hindcasts and forecasts show that the TCWB1T can make useful predictions as verified against the observations of OISST, ERSST, CFSR, and GPCP based on the methods of EOF, RMSE, anomaly correlation, ranked probability skill score (RPSS), reliability diagram (RD), and relative operating characteristics (ROCs). TCWB1T also has the same level of skill scores as NCEP CFSv2 and/or the ECMWF fifth-generation seasonal forecast system (SEAS5), based on EOF, anomaly pattern correlation, climatological bias, RMSE, temporal correlation, and anomaly correlation percentage of forecast skill. TCWB1T shows forecast skill that is better in winter than in summer. Overall, it indicates that TCWB1T can be used for seasonal ENSO predictions.
Abstract
The first version of the Taiwan Central Weather Bureau one-tier (TCWB1T) fully coupled global atmospheric and oceanic modeling forecast system had been developed and implemented as a routine operation for seasonal prediction at Central Weather Bureau (CWB) in 2017, with a minor revision in 2020. Based on NCEP CFSv1, the global atmospheric model in NCEP CFSv1 was replaced by CWB’s atmospheric global spectral model (GSM) and coupled with the GFDL MOM3. Several parameters have been tested and tuned in the CWB atmospheric GSM, achieving an optimal configuration with better sea surface temperature (SST) predictions for integration more than one year. Using NCEP CFSR as the initial condition, TCWB1T conducted hindcasts from 1982 to 2011 and forecasts from 2012 to 2019 to analyze its performance. The results of these hindcasts and forecasts show that the TCWB1T can make useful predictions as verified against the observations of OISST, ERSST, CFSR, and GPCP based on the methods of EOF, RMSE, anomaly correlation, ranked probability skill score (RPSS), reliability diagram (RD), and relative operating characteristics (ROCs). TCWB1T also has the same level of skill scores as NCEP CFSv2 and/or the ECMWF fifth-generation seasonal forecast system (SEAS5), based on EOF, anomaly pattern correlation, climatological bias, RMSE, temporal correlation, and anomaly correlation percentage of forecast skill. TCWB1T shows forecast skill that is better in winter than in summer. Overall, it indicates that TCWB1T can be used for seasonal ENSO predictions.
Abstract
Strong wind events cause significant societal damage ranging from loss of property and disruption of commerce to loss of life. Over portions of the United States, the strongest winds occur in the cold season and may be driven by interactions with the terrain (downslope winds, gap flow, and mountain wave activity). In the first part of this two-part series, we evaluate the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model wind speed and gust forecasts for the 2016–22 winter months over Wyoming and Colorado, an area prone to downslope windstorms and gap flows due to its complex topography. The HRRR model exhibits a positive bias for low wind speeds/gusts and a large negative bias for strong wind speeds/gusts. In general, the model misses many strong wind events, but when it does predict strong winds, there is a high false alarm probability. An analysis of proxies for surface winds is conducted. Specifically, 700- and 850-mb (1 mb = 1 hPa) geopotential height gradients are found to be good proxies for strong wind speeds and gusts at two wind-prone locations in Wyoming. Given the good agreement between low-level height gradients and surface wind speeds yet a strong negative bias for strong wind speeds and gusts, there is a potential shortcoming in the boundary layer physics in the HRRR model with regard to predicting strong winds over complex terrain, which is the focus of the second part of this two-part study. Last, the sites with the largest strong wind speed bias are found to mostly sit on the leeward side of high mountains, suggesting that the HRRR model performs poorly in the prediction of downslope windstorms.
Significance Statement
We investigate the performance of the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model with respect to strong wintertime wind speeds and gusts over the complex terrain of Wyoming and Colorado. We show that the overall performance of the HRRR model is low with regard to strong wind speed and wind gust forecasts across the investigated winter seasons, with a large negative bias in predicted strong wind speeds and gusts and a small positive bias for weak wind speeds and gusts. The largest biases are found to be on the leeward side of high mountains, indicating poor prediction of downslope winds. This study also utilizes National Weather Service forecasting metrics to understand their performance with respect to strong wind forecasts, and we find that they provide skill in forecasting these events.
Abstract
Strong wind events cause significant societal damage ranging from loss of property and disruption of commerce to loss of life. Over portions of the United States, the strongest winds occur in the cold season and may be driven by interactions with the terrain (downslope winds, gap flow, and mountain wave activity). In the first part of this two-part series, we evaluate the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model wind speed and gust forecasts for the 2016–22 winter months over Wyoming and Colorado, an area prone to downslope windstorms and gap flows due to its complex topography. The HRRR model exhibits a positive bias for low wind speeds/gusts and a large negative bias for strong wind speeds/gusts. In general, the model misses many strong wind events, but when it does predict strong winds, there is a high false alarm probability. An analysis of proxies for surface winds is conducted. Specifically, 700- and 850-mb (1 mb = 1 hPa) geopotential height gradients are found to be good proxies for strong wind speeds and gusts at two wind-prone locations in Wyoming. Given the good agreement between low-level height gradients and surface wind speeds yet a strong negative bias for strong wind speeds and gusts, there is a potential shortcoming in the boundary layer physics in the HRRR model with regard to predicting strong winds over complex terrain, which is the focus of the second part of this two-part study. Last, the sites with the largest strong wind speed bias are found to mostly sit on the leeward side of high mountains, suggesting that the HRRR model performs poorly in the prediction of downslope windstorms.
Significance Statement
We investigate the performance of the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model with respect to strong wintertime wind speeds and gusts over the complex terrain of Wyoming and Colorado. We show that the overall performance of the HRRR model is low with regard to strong wind speed and wind gust forecasts across the investigated winter seasons, with a large negative bias in predicted strong wind speeds and gusts and a small positive bias for weak wind speeds and gusts. The largest biases are found to be on the leeward side of high mountains, indicating poor prediction of downslope winds. This study also utilizes National Weather Service forecasting metrics to understand their performance with respect to strong wind forecasts, and we find that they provide skill in forecasting these events.
Abstract
Strong wind events can cause severe economic loss and societal impacts. Peak winds over Wyoming and Colorado occur during the wintertime months, and in the first part of this two-part series, it was shown that the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model displays large negative biases with respect to strong wind events. In this part of the study, we address two questions: 1) does increasing the horizontal resolution improve the representation of strong wind events over this region, and 2) are the biases in HRRR-forecasted winds related to the selected planetary boundary layer (PBL), surface layer (SL), and/or land surface model (LSM) parameterizations? We conduct Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model simulations to address these two main questions. Increasing the horizontal resolution leads to a small improvement in the simulation of strong wind speeds over the complex terrain of Wyoming and Colorado. In general, changes in the PBL, SL, and LSM parameterizations show much larger changes in simulated wind speeds compared to increasing the model resolution alone. Specifically, changing from the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino scheme to the Mellor–Yamada–Janjić PBL and SL schemes results in nearly no change in the r 2 values, but there is a decrease in the magnitude of the strong wind speed bias (from −12.52 to −10.16 m s−1). We attribute these differences to differences in the diagnosis of surface wind speeds and mixing in the boundary layer. Further analysis is conducted to determine the value of 1-km forecasts of strong winds compared with wind speed diagnostics commonly used by the National Weather Service.
Significance Statement
Motivated by prior studies showing low skill in the prediction of strong winds using state-of-the-art weather forecast models, in this study, we aim to investigate two questions: 1) does increasing the horizontal resolution improve the prediction of strong wind events over the complex terrain of Wyoming and Colorado, and 2) are the biases in High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) forecasted winds related to the selected planetary boundary layer, surface layer, and/or land surface model parameterizations? We find that increasing the horizontal resolution provides a slight improvement in the prediction of strong winds. Further, considerable improvement in the prediction of strong winds is found for varying boundary layer, surface layer, and land surface parameterizations.
Abstract
Strong wind events can cause severe economic loss and societal impacts. Peak winds over Wyoming and Colorado occur during the wintertime months, and in the first part of this two-part series, it was shown that the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model displays large negative biases with respect to strong wind events. In this part of the study, we address two questions: 1) does increasing the horizontal resolution improve the representation of strong wind events over this region, and 2) are the biases in HRRR-forecasted winds related to the selected planetary boundary layer (PBL), surface layer (SL), and/or land surface model (LSM) parameterizations? We conduct Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model simulations to address these two main questions. Increasing the horizontal resolution leads to a small improvement in the simulation of strong wind speeds over the complex terrain of Wyoming and Colorado. In general, changes in the PBL, SL, and LSM parameterizations show much larger changes in simulated wind speeds compared to increasing the model resolution alone. Specifically, changing from the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino scheme to the Mellor–Yamada–Janjić PBL and SL schemes results in nearly no change in the r 2 values, but there is a decrease in the magnitude of the strong wind speed bias (from −12.52 to −10.16 m s−1). We attribute these differences to differences in the diagnosis of surface wind speeds and mixing in the boundary layer. Further analysis is conducted to determine the value of 1-km forecasts of strong winds compared with wind speed diagnostics commonly used by the National Weather Service.
Significance Statement
Motivated by prior studies showing low skill in the prediction of strong winds using state-of-the-art weather forecast models, in this study, we aim to investigate two questions: 1) does increasing the horizontal resolution improve the prediction of strong wind events over the complex terrain of Wyoming and Colorado, and 2) are the biases in High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) forecasted winds related to the selected planetary boundary layer, surface layer, and/or land surface model parameterizations? We find that increasing the horizontal resolution provides a slight improvement in the prediction of strong winds. Further, considerable improvement in the prediction of strong winds is found for varying boundary layer, surface layer, and land surface parameterizations.
Abstract
Legacy National Weather Service verification techniques, when applied to current static severe convective warnings, exhibit limitations, particularly in accounting for the precise spatial and temporal aspects of warnings and severe convective events. Consequently, they are not particularly well suited for application to some proposed future National Weather Service warning delivery methods considered under the Forecasting a Continuum of Environmental Threats (FACETs) initiative. These methods include threats-in-motion (TIM), wherein warning polygons move nearly continuously with convective hazards, and probabilistic hazard information (PHI), a concept that involves augmenting warnings with rapidly updating probabilistic plumes. A new geospatial verification method was developed and evaluated, by which warnings and observations are placed on equivalent grids within a common reference frame, with each grid cell being represented as a hit, miss, false alarm, or correct null for each minute. New measures are computed, including false alarm area and location-specific lead time, departure time, and false alarm time. Using the 27 April 2011 tornado event, we applied the TIM and PHI warning techniques to demonstrate the benefits of rapidly updating warning areas, showcase the application of the geospatial verification method within this novel warning framework, and highlight the impact of varying probabilistic warning thresholds on warning performance. Additionally, the geospatial verification method was tested on a storm-based warning dataset (2008–22) to derive annual, monthly, and hourly statistics.
Abstract
Legacy National Weather Service verification techniques, when applied to current static severe convective warnings, exhibit limitations, particularly in accounting for the precise spatial and temporal aspects of warnings and severe convective events. Consequently, they are not particularly well suited for application to some proposed future National Weather Service warning delivery methods considered under the Forecasting a Continuum of Environmental Threats (FACETs) initiative. These methods include threats-in-motion (TIM), wherein warning polygons move nearly continuously with convective hazards, and probabilistic hazard information (PHI), a concept that involves augmenting warnings with rapidly updating probabilistic plumes. A new geospatial verification method was developed and evaluated, by which warnings and observations are placed on equivalent grids within a common reference frame, with each grid cell being represented as a hit, miss, false alarm, or correct null for each minute. New measures are computed, including false alarm area and location-specific lead time, departure time, and false alarm time. Using the 27 April 2011 tornado event, we applied the TIM and PHI warning techniques to demonstrate the benefits of rapidly updating warning areas, showcase the application of the geospatial verification method within this novel warning framework, and highlight the impact of varying probabilistic warning thresholds on warning performance. Additionally, the geospatial verification method was tested on a storm-based warning dataset (2008–22) to derive annual, monthly, and hourly statistics.
Abstract
To reduce hurricane intensity bias, the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) planetary boundary layer (PBL) and convection schemes have been updated with a new parameterization for environmental wind shear and enhanced entrainment and detrainment rates with increasing PBL or subcloud mean turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in their updraft and downdraft mass-flux schemes. Tests with the GFS show that the updated schemes significantly reduce the hurricane intensity bias by reducing the momentum transport in the mass-flux schemes. Along with the reduced intensity bias, the hurricane intensity and track errors have also been reduced. On the other hand, to reduce the PBL overgrowth over areas with a higher vegetation fraction or larger surface roughness, the entrainment rate in the PBL mass-flux scheme has also been increased with increasing vegetation fraction or increasing surface roughness. This entrainment rate increase has increased near-surface moisture, and as a result, helped to increase the underestimated convective available potential energy (CAPE) forecasts over the continental United States.
Abstract
To reduce hurricane intensity bias, the NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) planetary boundary layer (PBL) and convection schemes have been updated with a new parameterization for environmental wind shear and enhanced entrainment and detrainment rates with increasing PBL or subcloud mean turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) in their updraft and downdraft mass-flux schemes. Tests with the GFS show that the updated schemes significantly reduce the hurricane intensity bias by reducing the momentum transport in the mass-flux schemes. Along with the reduced intensity bias, the hurricane intensity and track errors have also been reduced. On the other hand, to reduce the PBL overgrowth over areas with a higher vegetation fraction or larger surface roughness, the entrainment rate in the PBL mass-flux scheme has also been increased with increasing vegetation fraction or increasing surface roughness. This entrainment rate increase has increased near-surface moisture, and as a result, helped to increase the underestimated convective available potential energy (CAPE) forecasts over the continental United States.
Abstract
Understanding how model physics impact tropical cyclone (TC) structure, motion, and evolution is critical for the development of TC forecast models. This study examines the impacts of microphysics and planetary boundary layer (PBL) physics on forecasts using the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), which is newly operational in 2023. The “HAFS-B” version is specifically evaluated, and three sensitivity tests (for over 400 cases in 15 Atlantic TCs) are compared with retrospective HAFS-B runs. Sensitivity tests are generated by 1) changing the microphysics in HAFS-B from Thompson to GFDL, 2) turning off the TC-specific PBL modifications that have been implemented in operational HAFS-B, and 3) combining the PBL and microphysics modifications. The forecasts are compared through standard verification metrics, and also examination of composite structure. Verification results show that Thompson microphysics slightly degrades the days 3–4 forecast track in HAFS-B, but improves forecasts of long-term intensity. The TC-specific PBL changes lead to a reduction in a negative intensity bias and improvement in RI skill, but cause some degradation in prediction of 34-kt (1 kt ≈ 0.51 m s−1) wind radii. Composites illustrate slightly deeper vortices in runs with the Thompson microphysics, and stronger PBL inflow with the TC-specific PBL modifications. These combined results demonstrate the critical role of model physics in regulating TC structure and intensity, and point to the need to continue to develop improvements to HAFS physics. The study also shows that the combination of both PBL and microphysics modifications (which are both included in one of the two versions of HAFS in the first operational implementation) leads to the best overall results.
Significance Statement
A new hurricane model, the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), is being introduced for operational prediction during the 2023 hurricane season. One of the most important parts of any forecast model are the “physics parameterizations,” or approximations of physical processes that govern things like turbulence, cloud formation, etc. In this study, we tested these approximations in one configuration of HAFS, HAFS-B. Specifically, we looked at two different versions of the microphysics (modeling the growth of water and ice in clouds) and boundary layer physics (the approximations for turbulence in the lowest level of the atmosphere). We found that both of these sets of model physics had important effects on the forecasts from HAFS. The microphysics had notable impacts on the track forecasts, and also changed the vertical depth of the model hurricanes. The boundary layer physics, including some of our changes based on observed hurricanes and turbulence-resolving models, helped the model better predict rapid intensification (periods where the wind speed increases quickly). Work is ongoing to improve the model physics for better forecasts of rapid intensification and overall storm structure, including storm size. The study also shows the combination of both PBL and microphysics modifications overall leads to the best results and thus was used as one of the two first operational implementations of HAFS.
Abstract
Understanding how model physics impact tropical cyclone (TC) structure, motion, and evolution is critical for the development of TC forecast models. This study examines the impacts of microphysics and planetary boundary layer (PBL) physics on forecasts using the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), which is newly operational in 2023. The “HAFS-B” version is specifically evaluated, and three sensitivity tests (for over 400 cases in 15 Atlantic TCs) are compared with retrospective HAFS-B runs. Sensitivity tests are generated by 1) changing the microphysics in HAFS-B from Thompson to GFDL, 2) turning off the TC-specific PBL modifications that have been implemented in operational HAFS-B, and 3) combining the PBL and microphysics modifications. The forecasts are compared through standard verification metrics, and also examination of composite structure. Verification results show that Thompson microphysics slightly degrades the days 3–4 forecast track in HAFS-B, but improves forecasts of long-term intensity. The TC-specific PBL changes lead to a reduction in a negative intensity bias and improvement in RI skill, but cause some degradation in prediction of 34-kt (1 kt ≈ 0.51 m s−1) wind radii. Composites illustrate slightly deeper vortices in runs with the Thompson microphysics, and stronger PBL inflow with the TC-specific PBL modifications. These combined results demonstrate the critical role of model physics in regulating TC structure and intensity, and point to the need to continue to develop improvements to HAFS physics. The study also shows that the combination of both PBL and microphysics modifications (which are both included in one of the two versions of HAFS in the first operational implementation) leads to the best overall results.
Significance Statement
A new hurricane model, the Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS), is being introduced for operational prediction during the 2023 hurricane season. One of the most important parts of any forecast model are the “physics parameterizations,” or approximations of physical processes that govern things like turbulence, cloud formation, etc. In this study, we tested these approximations in one configuration of HAFS, HAFS-B. Specifically, we looked at two different versions of the microphysics (modeling the growth of water and ice in clouds) and boundary layer physics (the approximations for turbulence in the lowest level of the atmosphere). We found that both of these sets of model physics had important effects on the forecasts from HAFS. The microphysics had notable impacts on the track forecasts, and also changed the vertical depth of the model hurricanes. The boundary layer physics, including some of our changes based on observed hurricanes and turbulence-resolving models, helped the model better predict rapid intensification (periods where the wind speed increases quickly). Work is ongoing to improve the model physics for better forecasts of rapid intensification and overall storm structure, including storm size. The study also shows the combination of both PBL and microphysics modifications overall leads to the best results and thus was used as one of the two first operational implementations of HAFS.
Abstract
This study documents the features of tornadoes, their parent storms, and the environments of the only two documented tornado outbreak events in China. The two events were associated with Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yagi on 12 August 2018 with 11 tornadoes and with an extratropical cyclone (EC) on 11 July 2021 (EC 711) with 13 tornadoes. Most tornadoes in TC Yagi were spawned from discrete minisupercells, while a majority of tornadoes in EC 711 were produced from supercells imbedded in QLCSs or cloud clusters. In both events, the high-tornado-density area was better collocated with the K index rather than MLCAPE, and with entraining rather than non-entraining parameters possibly due to their sensitivity to midlevel moisture. EC 711 had a larger displacement between maximum entraining CAPE and vertical wind shear than TC Yagi, with the maximum entraining CAPE better collocated with the high-tornado-density area than vertical wind shear. Relative to TC Yagi, EC 711 had stronger entraining CAPE, 0–1-km storm relative helicity, 0–6-km vertical wind shear, and composite parameters such as an entraining significant tornado parameter, which caused its generally stronger tornado vortex signatures (TVSs) and mesocyclones with a larger diameter and longer life span. No significant differences were found in the composite parameter of these two events from U.S. statistics. Although obvious dry air intrusions were observed in both events, no apparent impact was observed on the potential of tornado outbreak in EC 711. In TC Yagi, however, the dry air intrusion may have helped tornado outbreak due to cloudiness erosion and thus the increase in surface temperature and low-level lapse rate.
Abstract
This study documents the features of tornadoes, their parent storms, and the environments of the only two documented tornado outbreak events in China. The two events were associated with Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yagi on 12 August 2018 with 11 tornadoes and with an extratropical cyclone (EC) on 11 July 2021 (EC 711) with 13 tornadoes. Most tornadoes in TC Yagi were spawned from discrete minisupercells, while a majority of tornadoes in EC 711 were produced from supercells imbedded in QLCSs or cloud clusters. In both events, the high-tornado-density area was better collocated with the K index rather than MLCAPE, and with entraining rather than non-entraining parameters possibly due to their sensitivity to midlevel moisture. EC 711 had a larger displacement between maximum entraining CAPE and vertical wind shear than TC Yagi, with the maximum entraining CAPE better collocated with the high-tornado-density area than vertical wind shear. Relative to TC Yagi, EC 711 had stronger entraining CAPE, 0–1-km storm relative helicity, 0–6-km vertical wind shear, and composite parameters such as an entraining significant tornado parameter, which caused its generally stronger tornado vortex signatures (TVSs) and mesocyclones with a larger diameter and longer life span. No significant differences were found in the composite parameter of these two events from U.S. statistics. Although obvious dry air intrusions were observed in both events, no apparent impact was observed on the potential of tornado outbreak in EC 711. In TC Yagi, however, the dry air intrusion may have helped tornado outbreak due to cloudiness erosion and thus the increase in surface temperature and low-level lapse rate.
