A coupled atmosphere–ocean radiative transfer model has been applied to analyze a full year of broadband solar irradiances (up and down) measured over an ocean site 25 km east of the coast of Virginia in the Atlantic. The coupled model treats absorption and scattering by layers for both the atmosphere and the ocean explicitly and consistently. Key input parameters for the model (aerosol optical depth, wind speed, and total precipitable water) are also from in situ measurements. Having more observations to specify properties of the atmosphere than of the ocean, better model–observation agreement is obtained for the downwelling irradiance, which depends primarily on the atmospheric optical properties, than for the upwelling irradiance, which depends heavily on the ocean optical properties. The mean model–observation differences for the ocean surface albedo are generally less than 0.01. However, the modeled upwelling irradiances and albedo over the ocean surface are mostly less than the observations for all seasons, implying that more scattering in the ocean needs to be included in the model calculations. Sensitivity tests indicate that the uncertainties in aerosol optical properties, chlorophyll concentration, wind speed, or foams are not the primary factors for the model–observation differences in the ocean surface albedo, whereas the scattering by air bubbles and/or by suspended materials have the potential to significantly reduce or eliminate the model–observation differences in the ocean surface reflection.
Analysis of Broadband Solar Radiation and Albedo over the Ocean Surface at COVE
Authors:
Zhonghai JinAffiliationsAnalytical Services & Materials, Inc., Hampton, Virginia
Thomas P. CharlockAffiliationsAtmospheric Sciences Division, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia
Ken RutledgeAffiliationsAnalytical Services & Materials, Inc., Hampton, Virginia
See all authors & affiliations
Received: 9 October 2001
Final Form: 29 March 2002
Published Online: 1 October 2002
October 2002
Share this Article
Most Read JTECH Articles
(posted in the last 12 months)
|
Veillette et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
December 2018, Vol. 35, No. 12
|
|
Cauchy et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
December 2018, Vol. 35, No. 12
|
|
Lim et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
October 2018, Vol. 35, No. 10
|
|
Raghukumar et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
June 2019, Vol. 36, No. 6
|
|
Burley et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
February 2019, Vol. 36, No. 2
|
|
Siegelman et al.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
May 2019, Vol. 36, No. 5
|
Most Cited JTECH Articles
(past 3 years)
-
Egbert et al.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyFebruary 2002, Vol. 19, No. 2
-
Winker et al.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyNovember 2009, Vol. 26, No. 11
-
Menne et al.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyJuly 2012, Vol. 29, No. 7
-
Kummerow et al.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyJune 1998, Vol. 15, No. 3
-
Chen et al.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyJanuary 2003, Vol. 20, No. 1
-
Vickers et al.Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic TechnologyJune 1997, Vol. 14, No. 3
Featured Special Collections
Waves to Weather (W2W) - JAS, MWR, JHM, WAF
Process-Oriented Model Diagnostics - JCLI, JAS
IFloodS 2013: A Field Campaign to Support the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission - JHM
Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) - MWR, BAMS, WAF, JAMC
Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) - BAMS, MWR, JAMC, WAF, JTECH, JAS
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) - BAMS, MWR, JAS
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM): Science and Applications -BAMS, EI, MWR, JHM, JAMC, JTECH
Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) -JCLI, MWR, JHM, JAS


