Recent developments in the area of thunderstorm electrification processes are reviewed. These processes have two main divisions; (a) convective, in which particles charged by ion capture are moved by convection currents to strengthen the electric field in the cloud, and (b) processes involving charge transfer during particle interactions, following which oppositely charged particles move apart in the updraft to form the observed charge centers. Type-b processes are further subdivided into inductive (relying on the preexistence of an electric field) and noninductive charge-transfer mechanisms. Field and laboratory evidence points to the importance of interactions between particles of the ice phase, in the presence of liquid water droplets, in separating electric charge in thunderstorms. Recent experimental studies have investigated the dependence of charge transfer on the size and relative velocity of the interacting particles and have determined the dependence of the sign of the charge transfer on temperature and cloud liquid water content. Field data upon which the laboratory simulations are based are obtained by increasingly sophisticated airborne and ground-based means. Calculations of electric field growth using experimental charge-transfer data in numerical models of the dynamical and microphysical development of thunderstorms show agreement with observations, although further refinement is required. Some directions for future research are outlined.
A Review of Thunderstorm Electrification Processes
Authors:
C. P. R. SaundersAffiliationsPhysics Department, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, United Kingdom
Received: 5 January 1992
Final Form: 12 June 1992
Published Online: 1 April 1993
April 1993
Share this Article
Most Read
(posted in the last 12 months)
|
Kim et al.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
June 2019, Vol. 58, No. 6
|
|
Leduc et al.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
April 2019, Vol. 58, No. 4
|
|
Golroudbary et al.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
April 2019, Vol. 58, No. 4
|
|
Di Napoli et al.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
June 2019, Vol. 58, No. 6
|
|
Kumjian et al.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
February 2019, Vol. 58, No. 2
|
|
Hassim et al.
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
February 2019, Vol. 58, No. 2
|
Most Cited
(past 3 years)
-
KainJournal of Applied MeteorologyJanuary 2004, Vol. 43, No. 1
-
Wigley et al.Journal of Climate and Applied MeteorologyFebruary 1984, Vol. 23, No. 2
-
Lin et al.Journal of Climate and Applied MeteorologyJune 1983, Vol. 22, No. 6
-
DuchonJournal of Applied MeteorologyAugust 1979, Vol. 18, No. 8
-
Daly et al.Journal of Applied MeteorologyFebruary 1994, Vol. 33, No. 2
-
PleimJournal of Applied Meteorology and ClimatologySeptember 2007, Vol. 46, No. 9
Featured Special Collections
Waves to Weather (W2W) - JAS, MWR, JHM, WAF
Process-Oriented Model Diagnostics - JCLI, JAS
IFloodS 2013: A Field Campaign to Support the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission - JHM
Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) - MWR, BAMS, WAF, JAMC
Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) - BAMS, MWR, JAMC, WAF, JTECH, JAS
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) - BAMS, MWR, JAS
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM): Science and Applications -BAMS, EI, MWR, JHM, JAMC, JTECH
Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) -JCLI, MWR, JHM, JAS


