It is argued that a major fundamental limitation on the predictability of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation phenomenon is provided by the stochastic forcing of the tropical coupled ocean–atmosphere system by atmospheric transients. A new theoretical framework is used to analyze in detail the sensitivity of a skillful coupled forecast model to this stochastic forcing. The central concept in this analysis is the so-called stochastic optimal, which represents the spatial pattern of noise most efficient at causing variance growth within a dynamical system. A number of interesting conclusions are reached. (a) Sensitivity to forcing is greatest during the northern spring season and prior to warm events. (b) There is little sensitivity to meridional windstress noise. (c) A western Pacific dipole pattern in heat flux noise is most efficient in forcing eastern Pacific SST variance. An estimate of the actual wind stress stochastic forcing is obtained from recent ECMWF analyses and it is found that “unavoidable” error growth within the model due to this stochastic forcing saturates at approximately 0.5°C in the NINO3 region with very rapid error growth during the first 6 months. The noise projects predominantly onto the first stochastic optimal and, in addition, around 95% of the error growth can be attributed to stochastic forcing with a strong synoptic character.
A Theory for the Limitation of ENSO Predictability Due to Stochastic Atmospheric Transients
Authors:
Richard KleemanAffiliationsBureau of Meteorology Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Andrew M. MooreAffiliationsNova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, Dania, Florida
Received: 28 December 1995
Published Online: 15 March 1997
March 1997
Share this Article
Featured Special Collections
IFloodS 2013: A Field Campaign to Support the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission - JHM
Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) - MWR, BAMS
Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) - BAMS, MWR, JAMC, WAF, JTECH, JAS
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) - BAMS, MWR, JAS
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM): Science and Applications -BAMS, EI, MWR, JHM, JAMC, JTECH
Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) -JCLI, MWR, JHM, JAS
Peter J. Lamb Special Collection: Climate Variability and Its Impacts -JHM, JCLI, BAMS, WCAS, MWR
Most Read JAS Articles
(posted in the last 12 months)
|
Heavens
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
April 2017, Vol. 74, No. 4
|
|
Moncrieff et al.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
May 2017, Vol. 74, No. 5
|
|
Hayashi et al.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
November 2017, Vol. 74, No. 11
|
|
Chougule et al.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
April 2017, Vol. 74, No. 4
|
|
Zhang et al.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
October 2017, Vol. 74, No. 10
|
|
Adames et al.
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
June 2017, Vol. 74, No. 6
|
Most Cited JAS Articles
(past 3 years)
-
LorenzJournal of the Atmospheric SciencesMarch 1963, Vol. 20, No. 2
-
DudhiaJournal of the Atmospheric SciencesOctober 1989, Vol. 46, No. 20
-
Remer et al.Journal of the Atmospheric SciencesApril 2005, Vol. 62, No. 4
-
Madden et al.Journal of the Atmospheric SciencesJuly 1971, Vol. 28, No. 5
-
Madden et al.Journal of the Atmospheric SciencesSeptember 1972, Vol. 29, No. 6
-
Hoskins et al.Journal of the Atmospheric SciencesJune 1981, Vol. 38, No. 6



