A tropical disturbance made landfall near Morehead City, North Carolina, on 27 June 2006. Surface observations, Air Force reconnaissance, and Doppler velocity data suggest that the disturbance had a closed surface circulation at landfall, with maximum 1-min surface winds >18 m s−1, the threshold of tropical storm strength. A cyclostrophic wind calculation using Doppler velocity data and surface observations indicates that the circulation of the disturbance likely caused the tropical storm force winds observed, rather than an environmental pressure gradient or short-lived convective process. Doppler velocity cross sections of the disturbance further suggest that the disturbance was warm core, and an analysis of the disturbance’s environment reveals that latent heat of condensation was likely a large source of energy for the disturbance, though there was some baroclinic forcing. These observations and analyses make a compelling case for the upgrade of the disturbance to a tropical storm in the best-track database.
Structure and Evolution of a Possible U.S. Landfalling Tropical Storm in 2006
Authors:
Zachary GruskinAffiliationsNOAA/Hurricane Research Division, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, and the Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School for Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
Received: 11 March 2009
Final Form: 1 June 2009
Published Online: 1 January 2010
January 2010
Share this Article
Most Read MWR Articles
(posted in the last 12 months)
|
Taszarek et al.
Monthly Weather Review
June 2019, Vol. 147, No. 6
|
|
Rasp et al.
Monthly Weather Review
November 2018, Vol. 146, No. 11
|
|
Keller et al.
Monthly Weather Review
April 2019, Vol. 147, No. 4
|
|
Gross et al.
Monthly Weather Review
November 2018, Vol. 146, No. 11
|
|
Thomas et al.
Monthly Weather Review
February 2019, Vol. 147, No. 2
|
|
Tippett
Monthly Weather Review
November 2018, Vol. 146, No. 11
|
Most Cited MWR Articles
(past 3 years)
-
SMAGORINSKYMonthly Weather ReviewMarch 1963, Vol. 91, No. 3
-
Hong et al.Monthly Weather ReviewSeptember 2006, Vol. 134, No. 9
-
Chen et al.Monthly Weather ReviewApril 2001, Vol. 129, No. 4
-
PRIESTLEY et al.Monthly Weather ReviewFebruary 1972, Vol. 100, No. 2
-
Wheeler et al.Monthly Weather ReviewAugust 2004, Vol. 132, No. 8
-
BRIERMonthly Weather ReviewJanuary 1950, Vol. 78, No. 1
Featured Special Collections
Waves to Weather (W2W) - JAS, MWR, JHM, WAF
Process-Oriented Model Diagnostics - JCLI, JAS
IFloodS 2013: A Field Campaign to Support the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission - JHM
Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) - MWR, BAMS, WAF, JAMC
Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) - BAMS, MWR, JAMC, WAF, JTECH, JAS
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) - BAMS, MWR, JAS
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM): Science and Applications -BAMS, EI, MWR, JHM, JAMC, JTECH
Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) -JCLI, MWR, JHM, JAS


