As new observation systems are developed and deployed, new and presumably more precise information is becoming available for weather forecasting and climate monitoring. To take advantage of these new observations, it is desirable to have schemes to accurately retrieve the information before statistical analyses are performed so that statistical computation can be more effectively used where it is needed most. The authors propose a sequential variational approach that possesses advantages of both a standard statistical analysis [such as with a three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) or Kalman filter] and a traditional objective analysis (such as the Barnes analysis). The sequential variational analysis is multiscale, inhomogeneous, anisotropic, and temporally consistent, as shown by an idealized test case and observational datasets in this study. The real data cases include applications in two-dimensional and three-dimensional space and time for storm outflow boundary detection (surface application) and hurricane data assimilation (three-dimensional space application). Implemented using a multigrid technique, this sequential variational approach is a very efficient data assimilation method.
A Space–Time Multiscale Analysis System: A Sequential Variational Analysis Approach
Authors:
Y. Xie, S. Koch, and J. McGinleyAffiliationsNOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado
S. AlbersAffiliationsNOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, and Cooperative Institutes for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
P. E. BieringerAffiliationsNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
M. Wolfson and M. ChanAffiliationsLincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
See all authors & affiliations
Received: 6 January 2010
Final Form: 23 November 2010
Published Online: 1 April 2011
April 2011
Share this Article
Most Read MWR Articles
(posted in the last 12 months)
|
Taszarek et al.
Monthly Weather Review
June 2019, Vol. 147, No. 6
|
|
Rasp et al.
Monthly Weather Review
November 2018, Vol. 146, No. 11
|
|
Keller et al.
Monthly Weather Review
April 2019, Vol. 147, No. 4
|
|
Gross et al.
Monthly Weather Review
November 2018, Vol. 146, No. 11
|
|
Thomas et al.
Monthly Weather Review
February 2019, Vol. 147, No. 2
|
|
Tippett
Monthly Weather Review
November 2018, Vol. 146, No. 11
|
Most Cited MWR Articles
(past 3 years)
-
SMAGORINSKYMonthly Weather ReviewMarch 1963, Vol. 91, No. 3
-
Hong et al.Monthly Weather ReviewSeptember 2006, Vol. 134, No. 9
-
Chen et al.Monthly Weather ReviewApril 2001, Vol. 129, No. 4
-
PRIESTLEY et al.Monthly Weather ReviewFebruary 1972, Vol. 100, No. 2
-
Wheeler et al.Monthly Weather ReviewAugust 2004, Vol. 132, No. 8
-
BRIERMonthly Weather ReviewJanuary 1950, Vol. 78, No. 1
Featured Special Collections
Waves to Weather (W2W) - JAS, MWR, JHM, WAF
Process-Oriented Model Diagnostics - JCLI, JAS
IFloodS 2013: A Field Campaign to Support the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission - JHM
Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) - MWR, BAMS, WAF, JAMC
Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) - BAMS, MWR, JAMC, WAF, JTECH, JAS
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) - BAMS, MWR, JAS
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM): Science and Applications -BAMS, EI, MWR, JHM, JAMC, JTECH
Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) -JCLI, MWR, JHM, JAS


