The fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) will produce a state-of-the- art multimodel dataset designed to advance our knowledge of climate variability and climate change. Researchers worldwide are analyzing the model output and will produce results likely to underlie the forthcoming Fifth Assessment Report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Unprecedented in scale and attracting interest from all major climate modeling groups, CMIP5 includes “long term” simulations of twentieth-century climate and projections for the twenty-first century and beyond. Conventional atmosphere–ocean global climate models and Earth system models of intermediate complexity are for the first time being joined by more recently developed Earth system models under an experiment design that allows both types of models to be compared to observations on an equal footing. Besides the longterm experiments, CMIP5 calls for an entirely new suite of “near term” simulations focusing on recent decades and the future to year 2035. These “decadal predictions” are initialized based on observations and will be used to explore the predictability of climate and to assess the forecast system's predictive skill. The CMIP5 experiment design also allows for participation of stand-alone atmospheric models and includes a variety of idealized experiments that will improve understanding of the range of model responses found in the more complex and realistic simulations. An exceptionally comprehensive set of model output is being collected and made freely available to researchers through an integrated but distributed data archive. For researchers unfamiliar with climate models, the limitations of the models and experiment design are described.
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Authors:
See all authors & affiliations
Final Form: 28 September 2011
Published Online: 1 April 2012
April 2012
Share this Article
Most Read BAMS Articles
(posted in the last 12 months)
|
Knutson et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
EOR
|
|
Beck et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
March 2019, Vol. 100, No. 3
|
|
Ralph et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
February 2019, Vol. 100, No. 2
|
|
Junkermann et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
December 2018, Vol. 99, No. 12
|
|
Hawkins et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
May 2019, Vol. 100, No. 5
|
|
Landsea et al.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
November 2018, Vol. 99, No. 11
|
Most Cited BAMS Articles
(past 3 years)
-
Taylor et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyApril 2012, Vol. 93, No. 4
-
Kalnay et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyMarch 1996, Vol. 77, No. 3
-
Torrence et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyJanuary 1998, Vol. 79, No. 1
-
Saha et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAugust 2010, Vol. 91, No. 8
-
Stein et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyDecember 2015, Vol. 96, No. 12
-
Kanamitsu et al.Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyNovember 2002, Vol. 83, No. 11
Featured Special Collections
Waves to Weather (W2W) - JAS, MWR, JHM, WAF
Process-Oriented Model Diagnostics - JCLI, JAS
IFloodS 2013: A Field Campaign to Support the NASA-JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission - JHM
Ontario Winter Lake-effect Systems (OWLeS) - MWR, BAMS, WAF, JAMC
Plains Elevated Convection At Night (PECAN) - BAMS, MWR, JAMC, WAF, JTECH, JAS
Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) - BAMS, MWR, JAS
Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM): Science and Applications -BAMS, EI, MWR, JHM, JAMC, JTECH
Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) -JCLI, MWR, JHM, JAS


