Linkages between diminishing Arctic sea ice and changes in Arctic terrestrial ecosystems have not been previously demonstrated. Here, the authors use a newly available Arctic Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) dataset (a measure of vegetation photosynthetic capacity) to document coherent temporal relationships between near-coastal sea ice, summer tundra land surface temperatures, and vegetation productivity. The authors find that, during the period of satellite observations (1982–2008), sea ice within 50 km of the coast during the period of early summer ice breakup declined an average of 25% for the Arctic as a whole, with much larger changes in the East Siberian Sea to Chukchi Sea sectors (>44% decline). The changes in sea ice conditions are most directly relevant and have the strongest effect on the villages and ecosystems immediately adjacent to the coast, but the terrestrial effects of sea ice changes also extend far inland. Low-elevation (<300 m) tundra summer land temperatures, as indicated by the summer warmth index (SWI; sum of the monthly-mean temperatures above freezing, expressed as °C month−1), have increased an average of 5°C month−1 (24% increase) for the Arctic as a whole; the largest changes (+10° to 12°C month−1) have been over land along the Chukchi and Bering Seas. The land warming has been more pronounced in North America (+30%) than in Eurasia (16%). When expressed as percentage change, land areas in the High Arctic in the vicinity of the Greenland Sea, Baffin Bay, and Davis Strait have experienced the largest changes (>70%). The NDVI has increased across most of the Arctic, with some exceptions over land regions along the Bering and west Chukchi Seas. The greatest change in absolute maximum NDVI occurred over tundra in northern Alaska on the Beaufort Sea coast [+0.08 Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) NDVI units]. When expressed as percentage change, large NDVI changes (10%–15%) occurred over land in the North America High Arctic and along the Beaufort Sea. Ground observations along an 1800-km climate transect in North America support the strong correlations between satellite NDVI observations and summer land temperatures. Other new observations from near the Lewis Glacier, Baffin Island, Canada, document rapid vegetation changes along the margins of large retreating glaciers and may be partly responsible for the large NDVI changes observed in northern Canada and Greenland. The ongoing changes to plant productivity will affect many aspects of Arctic systems, including changes to active-layer depths, permafrost, biodiversity, wildlife, and human use of these regions. Ecosystems that are presently adjacent to year-round (perennial) sea ice are likely to experience the greatest changes.
Arctic land surface temperatures have increased (Kaufman et al. 2009) and are predicted to continue warming with major repercussions for terrestrial ecosystems (ACIA 2004; Serreze et al. 2007; Post et al. 2009). Observational studies have documented the well-known cooling effect that sea ice has on adjacent landmasses (Rouse 1991; Haugen and Brown 1980), whereas global climate model simulations show that coastal Arctic land surfaces warm when summer sea ice decreases (Bhatt et al. 2008; Lawrence et al. 2008). We might also expect a strong linkage between sea ice concentrations and tundra productivity, because approximately 80% of non-alpine tundra is located within 100 km of a coastline, making it essentially a maritime biome (Walker et al. 2005). However, the direct observational linkages between sea ice retreat, land warming, and increased terrestrial productivity have not heretofore been established. Here we examine the hypothesis that the decline in sea ice is linked to increases in land temperatures and tundra productivity. We use a newly available satellite-derived dataset of Arctic Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI; J. E. Pinzon et al. 2010, unpublished manuscript) to demonstrate a consistent temporal relationship between sea ice, NDVI, and land temperatures over Arctic tundra. These data permitted the first circumpolar analysis over tundra of NDVI changes in the High Arctic north of 72°N.
The spatial patterns of NDVI are most strongly related to land temperatures and the glacial history of the landscapes (Raynolds et al. 2010, manuscript submitted to Ecography). The circumpolar pattern of average annual maximum NDVI (MaxNDVI; Figure 1) corresponds also to nearby sea ice cover, with the lowest MaxNDVI values in the Canadian Archipelago, northern Greenland, and other Arctic islands adjacent to the perennial sea ice. The presence of the near-shore summer sea ice limits the ability of the land surface to warm during the summer. The photosynthetic capacity of Arctic vegetation, as measured from satellites using the NDVI, has increased over the last 25+ years (Jia et al. 2003; Goetz et al. 2005; Bunn et al. 2007; Verbyla 2008). This trend has been attributed to an increase in shrubs (Tape et al. 2006; Lantz 2008) and a longer growing season (Jia et al. 2003). There have also been notable declines of summer sea ice area (Comiso et al. 2008), extent (Stroeve et al. 2008), and thickness during the past several decades (Rothrock et al. 2008; Kwok and Rothrock 2009). Mean annual surface air temperatures based on pan-Arctic station data poleward of 60°N have increased 1.4°C over the last century with the most rapid warming documented at maritime stations adjacent to areas of declining sea ice (Bekryaev et al. 2010).
2. Data and methods
This study used estimates of sea ice concentration from Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data (Comiso and Nishio 2008) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) radiometric surface temperature from 1982 to 2008. The surface temperature data have been enhanced through more effective cloud masking techniques and calibration through the utilization of in situ surface temperature data (Comiso 2003). The summer warmth index (SWI) was calculated as the sum of average May–September monthly surface temperatures above freezing at each pixel.
The NDVI represents the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) that is absorbed by the plant canopy and depends on a variety of vegetation properties such as vertical and horizontal structure, species composition, phenological stage, and physiological condition. The NDVI has been used extensively to monitor vegetation changes in the Arctic (Stow et al. 2004). The reflectivity of green plants varies with wavelength, which is the basis for the NDVI index: NDVI = (NIR − RED)/(NIR + RED), where NIR is surface reflectance in the near infrared (0.725–1.1 μm) and RED is the reflectance in the visible radiation (0.55–0.70 μm).
Remotely sensed 8-km-resolution National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS; available online at http://gimms.gsfc.nasa.gov/) biweekly maximum NDVI data (J. E. Pinzon et al. 2010, unpublished manuscript) are derived from AVHRR sensors that were flown on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-7 (NOAA-7) through NOAA-18 satellites. This new dataset corrected discontinuities in the GIMMS NDVI north of 72°N and permitted the first comprehensive analysis of NDVI trends in the High Arctic. The new GIMMSg3 dataset uses the Sea-Viewing Wide-Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) for calibrating between sensors. The old GIMMS series used SPOT data, which only had coverage to 72°N and created an artificial boundary at that latitude. The AVHRR time series was compared with data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), which samples narrower wavelengths and produces an NDVI that is considered more accurate than the AVHRR NDVI. The AHVRR data for the period of overlapping coverage show the same trends and variability as the MODIS data, validating the accuracy and consistency of the AVHRR time series. This study used approximately 12-km-resolution NDVI data to more closely match the other observations. The MaxNDVI is the highest summer NDVI value, representing peak vegetation photosynthetic capacity, and serves as an indicator of tundra biomass (Shippert et al. 1995; Walker et al. 2003). The unitless time-integrated NDVI (TI-NDVI) is the sum of biweekly values above 0.05 from May to September. TI-NDVI incorporates the length of the growing season and phenological variations and better represents gross primary production than MaxNDVI (Tucker and Sellers 1986). The Arctic tundra zone was defined according to the circumpolar Arctic vegetation map (Walker et al. 2005), with a southern boundary defined by the Arctic tree line.
The Arctic Ocean was divided into subregions (Figure 2) modified from the map “The Arctic Ocean within accepted boundaries” in the Arctic Atlas (Treshnikov 1985), and the adjacent land divisions approximately follow the floristic provinces of the circumpolar Arctic vegetation map (Walker et al. 2005). For simplicity, both land and ocean areas will be identified by the name of the corresponding sea in the rest of the paper. The analysis constructs time series averaged over regions within 50 km of the Arctic coastline to focus on the domain of maximum maritime influence [approximately 60% of Arctic tundra with elevations less than 300 m is within 50 km of the coastline]. The analysis was repeated for a 100-km coastal zone and also for the full Arctic tundra region below elevations of 300 m. The results of the three analyses were similar; we report the results only for the 50-km domain, except in Table 1, where correlations over the full tundra are included. Time series of regional sea ice concentration, SWI, and NDVI were constructed for the 50-km-wide domains for the Pan-Arctic, North America, Eurasia, and Arctic subregions. The timing of the mean 50% ice concentration was most strongly correlated with SWI in the following summer and displayed high variability, so it was chosen as the base period for analyzing the sea ice data in the context of tundra vegetation. Sea ice time series were constructed using ice concentration data averaged over a 3-week period centered on the week when mean concentrations were 50%, the timing of which varied regionally (Table 1). The 60% sea ice concentration level was used for the Canadian Archipelago because a higher threshold was needed because a 50% sea ice concentration is not common in this domain. The results from the Lincoln Sea, American Arctic Basin, and Russian Arctic Basin areas were not presented because the corresponding land area was so small. Standard linear correlations and least squares fit trend lines were calculated to investigate the relationship between sea ice, NDVI, and SWI. All time series were linearly detrended before calculating correlations to separate variability and trend relationships. The statistical significance of correlations and trends was assessed using a two-tailed t test at the 5% and 10% levels.
During our study period (1982–2008), springtime sea ice decreased in most of the Arctic (Figures 3a and 4a). Northern Hemisphere sea ice within 50 km of the coast displayed an absolute decline of 15% (Figure 5a) and a relative decline of 25% from 1982 to 2008 (Figure 5c). The largest percentage (relative) changes of sea ice area were in the East Siberian (−47%), west Chukchi (−46%), east Chukchi (−44%), and east Kara (−40%) Seas (Figure 5c). Positive sea ice trends in a few areas such as southeast Novaya Zemlya (Figures 3a and 4a) were likely caused by an accumulation of fragmented sea ice. Sea ice in the Greenland Sea, which displayed the smallest percentage change (−10%; Figure 5c), is replenished from the Arctic through Fram Strait.
The largest absolute increases in summer land temperature were found in the Bering and Chukchi regions (>10°C month−1; Figures 3b and 5a). When expressed as percentage change the summer warmth index (SWI; the sum of monthly-mean temperatures > 0°C) increased an average of 24% for the Arctic as a whole (Figures 5c and 7a). Greater warming occurred in North America (30%) than in Eurasia (16%; Figures 5c and 7b,c). Warming trends in the vicinity of the Greenland Sea, Baffin Bay, and Davis Strait displayed the largest percentage changes (>70%; Figures 5c and 9e–g) but had relatively small magnitudes (Figure 5a). Large percentage changes in the SWI (Figure 5c) also occurred in the Beringia region (60% for west Chukchi Sea, 43% for west Bering Sea, 38% for East Siberian Sea, and 37% for east Chukchi Sea). Southern Novaya Zemlya and the northern tip of the Taimyr Peninsula, Russia, cooled, consistent with nearby coastal sea ice increases (Figures 3b and 4b). Northern Yamal, Gydan, and the southern tundra on the Taimyr also displayed cooling trends but did not have local ice decreases.
The magnitude and percentage changes in NDVI since 1982 present a generally consistent picture of increased vegetation photosynthesis in areas of land warming and sea ice decline (Figures 3c,d and 4c,d). MaxNDVI increased the most in northern Alaska, northern Canadian mainland, southwest Greenland, and Taimyr (Figure 3c). When expressed as percentage change, large increases also occurred in High Arctic Canada and Greenland (+10% for Canadian Archipelago, 5% for Baffin Bay, 10% for Davis Strait, and 8% for Greenland Sea; Figure 5d). There were declines in the Kara and Barents Seas, which displayed generally weak summer land-temperature increases. The TI-NDVI trends (Figures 5b,d) were of the same sign as MaxNDVI in all of the regions but Baffin Bay. In regions adjacent to the east Bering and west Chukchi, MaxNDVI declined (−4% and −5%, respectively) but SWI increased (27% and 60%, respectively; Figure 5d). The Bering Sea is one of few areas in the Arctic where the trends in sea ice area have been positive (Comiso and Nishio 2008), indicating a possible delay in spring greenup and a change in seasonality that is reflected in the NDVI trends.
Correlation analysis using linearly detrended time series showed that, when sea ice was below average, SWI and TI-NDVI were above normal (Figure 6), consistent with previous trends documenting strong circumpolar NDVI–surface temperature relationships (Raynolds et al. 2008). Correlations between TI-NDVI and SWI were generally high, with a 0.64 correlation for the Northern Hemisphere (Table 1). Sea ice had somewhat lower correlations with SWI (−0.49 for the Northern Hemisphere) and TI-NDVI (−0.56). Because the NDVI and SWI are collocated and integrated measures, it is expected that these correlations would be higher than those with sea ice. Springtime sea ice and summer land temperatures are significantly correlated in 9 of 14 Arctic sea regions, land temperatures and NDVI are significantly correlated in 12, and sea ice and NDVI are significantly correlated in 6 (Table 1). When TI-NDVI and SWI were calculated using the full tundra domain, the correlations with sea ice were generally slightly weaker but still strongly significant (Table 1).
Time series from 1982 to 2008 of sea ice concentration (blue), SWI (red), MaxNDVI (dark green), and TI-NDVI (light green), displayed for the hemispheric, Eurasian, and North American domains (Figures 7 –9), indicate that interannual variability is overall larger in the Eurasian seas. However, east Bering, east Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas (Figures 9a–c) display the largest standard deviations in individual seas for SWI and sea ice concentration ranging from 3.9° to 4.2°C month−1 and from 17.9% to 19.7%, respectively. The variability in the Canadian Arctic (Figures 9d–f) is generally low for all variables, contributing to the smaller variance in North America versus Eurasia. Variability of MaxNDVI (TI-NDVI) is notably larger in Eurasia (Figures 7 and 8), ranging from 0.016 to 0.032 (0.140 to 0.229) compared to North America (Figures 7 and 9), where it ranges from 0.012 to 0.022 (0.088 to 0.254). The strongest correlations (Table 1) between springtime sea ice concentration and SWI are found for the Canadian Archipelago (−0.77; Figure 9d) and the Laptev regions (−0.68; Figure 8d) and are confirmed visually by strong covariability seen in the corresponding time series. These time series reinforce the notion that sea ice concentration, SWI, and NDVI vary in unison throughout the Arctic.
A few ground-based studies were available to support the conclusions of this study. The strong linkages between SWI, NDVI, and above-ground plant biomass were documented in a study of zonal vegetation along the full Arctic climate gradient in North America (Figure 10a). SWI increased from 4° to 31°C month−1 along the north–south temperature gradient; the corresponding NDVI (determined with hand-held instruments) of zonal vegetation increased from 0.15 to 0.52 (Figure 10c), and biomass increased from 50 to 920 g m−2 (Figure 10d; Epstein et al. 2008). A recent 27-yr study from the Alexandra Fjord region of Ellesmere Island was the first plot-based study to document long-term tundra biomass increases in the Arctic (Hudson and Henry 2009). The study linked increases in bryophyte and evergreen shrub biomass to regional warming during the past 30–50 years. At another High Arctic site on northern Baffin Island, repeat photographs taken 46 years after the initial observations (Webber 1971) document the dramatic changes associated with vegetation succession in areas deglaciated within the past 500 years (Figure 11). The rapid revegetation of these recently exposed landscapes and the known relationship between NDVI and glacial surface age (Raynolds and Walker 2009) could help explain the very large percentage changes in MaxNDVI observed in areas adjacent to the Greenland Sea, Baffin Bay, and Davis Strait (Figure 5d), which are all areas with large retreating glaciers.
There is particularly strong potential for rapid change in the extreme High Arctic (bioclimate subzone A; Figure 10a,b), where summer-long sea ice at the coast maintains the currently very cold summer land temperatures (mean July temperatures are <3°C). These areas correspond to the “polar desert” described in Russian approaches to Arctic vegetation zonation (Alexandrova 1980) and have unique tundra with only about 50 Arctic vascular plant species in local floras, no woody plants, no sedges, and no Sphagnum mosses, and there is no peat in the wetlands. The vegetation is instead dominated by mosses; lichens; blue-green algae; and a few grasses, rushes, and forbs (Figure 10b). The vegetation is sparse here because summer temperatures are close to the biological limit for plant growth. Small increases in plant biomass, as reflected in the magnitude of the MaxNDVI, correspond to high percentage changes with large biological implications (Myers and Pitelka 1979; cf. High Arctic Canada in Figures 5b,d). Melting the summer coastal ice in subzone A will result in very large relative increases in summer land temperatures. A shift in the mean July temperature of only 2°C would likely transform the vegetation of bioclimate subzone A into something more closely resembling the vegetation of subzone B, with a potential doubling of the number of vascular plants (50–100 versus <50 species), the introduction of common tundra plant functional types that are missing in subzone A (i.e., sedges and woody plants), and a large increase in plant production from the current <30 to 50–200 g m−2. There would also be major repercussions to other components of the ecosystems, including more complex wetlands and increases in the diversity of insects and birds (Chernov and Matveyeva 1997). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report global climate models project future Arctic temperatures to warm from 2° to 9°C by 2100 (Chapman and Walsh 2007). The changes in subzone A could be closer to the extreme temperature increases expected because of the shift at the coast from cold high-albedo ice to relatively warm low-albedo water. Although increases in biological diversity and increased productivity may be viewed positively in most parts of the world, these changes would essentially eliminate the unique character of this coldest bioclimate subzone.
The consistent correlations between springtime sea ice concentrations, summertime land warming, and tundra productivity support the conclusion that sea ice decreases are linked to warmer land temperatures and vegetation productivity increases. The correlations when combined with other evidence suggest, though not conclusively, that sea ice decline may be the primary driver of the near-coastal land surface warming. First, the general maritime nature of the Arctic tundra biome (Figure 1) indicates that average MaxNDVI and sea ice cover are closely linked, where areas with high (low) sea ice concentrations are adjacent to land with low (high) plant productivity, because summer warmth is limited because of nearby ice cover. Bekryaev et al. (Bekryaev et al. 2010) calculated annual average surface air temperature trends as function of distance from the Arctic coast (see their Figure 5) and found the largest trends occurred at maritime stations adjacent to the declining sea ice. In addition, global climate model studies with specified sea ice area, where the atmospheric response is driven only by sea ice anomalies, indicate that either moderate (Bhatt et al. 2008) or large (Lawrence et al. 2008; Deser et al. 2010) reductions in near-coastal sea ice led to warmer air temperatures over the coastal Arctic. Deser et al. (Deser et al. 2010) compare a reduced fixed sea ice climate model experiment to a comparable fully coupled ice–ocean–atmosphere and found that sea ice loss accounts for most of the high-latitude warming in all seasons. Rennermalm et al. (Rennermalm et al. 2009) have argued that sea ice decline has led to ice sheet surface melt in Greenland in an observational study. Liu et al. (Liu et al. 2009) use remote sensing data from 1982 to 2004 in an attempt to separate surface temperature warming over the Arctic Ocean due to sea ice and that due to clouds (Liu et al. 2009). They found that the sea ice decline explained much of the fall warming in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, whereas clouds were the main driver of warming during spring. Although we suspect that sea ice decline significantly warms adjacent land areas, given the heterogeneity of the trends, seasonality of key processes, and complex nature of local circulations, further analysis is required to reach a firmer conclusion.
The previously documented changes of MaxNDVI in northern Alaska and the Beaufort Sea region are the largest in the Arctic (Figure 4) and are likely linked to the strong retreat of sea ice in this region (Nghiem et al. 2007) and changes in erect shrub production (Tape et al. 2006; Lantz 2008). The corrected NDVI data north of 72°N permitted us to also document ecologically important percentage changes of NDVI in the High Arctic, where there are few or no shrubs. In these sparsely vegetated ecosystems, the NDVI changes are most likely a result of greater plant density. The vegetation change occurring in the vicinity of the Lewis Glacier is representative of similar changes all along the margins of the retreating glaciers in northern Canada and Greenland. Our conclusion is that the vegetation in the High Arctic is being affected by summer land-temperature increases that are likely associated with rapid sea ice declines and that areas marginal to perennial sea ice (subzone A) and the margins of the large glaciers will see the most rapid percentage changes if the perennial ice vanishes.
This study was supported by Grants NSF ARC-0531180, NASA NNG6NE00A, NSF ANS-0732885, NSF ARC-0902175; NASA Land Cover Land Use Change on the Yamal Peninsula; and a graduate fellowship (MKR) from the UAF Center for Global Change and the Cooperative Institute for Arctic Research (CIFAR) through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under Cooperative Agreement NA17RJ1224 with the University of Alaska.
This work benefited from insightful comments from two anonymous reviewers, Terry Chapin, and David Verbyla. H. Maier is thanked for the assistance with preparing graphics.
* Corresponding author address: Uma S. Bhatt, Geophysical Institute, and Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 930 Koyukuk Drive, Fairbanks, AK, 99775. email@example.com