Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 10 of 26 items for :
- Author or Editor: Andrew Hoell x
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society x
- Refine by Access: All Content x
Abstract
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2020 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Abstract
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2020 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Abstract
The sources of predictability for the February 2021 cold air outbreak (CAO) over the central United States, which led to power grid failures and water delivery shortages in Texas, are diagnosed using a machine learning–based prediction model called a linear inverse model (LIM). The flexibility and low computational cost of the LIM allows its forecasts to be used for identifying and assessing the predictability of key physical processes. The LIM may also be run as a climate model for sensitivity and risk analysis for the same reasons. The February 2021 CAO was a subseasonal forecast of opportunity, as the LIM confidently predicted the CAO’s onset and duration four weeks in advance, up to two weeks earlier than other initialized numerical forecast models. The LIM shows that the February 2021 CAO was principally caused by unpredictable internal atmospheric variability and predictable La Niña teleconnections, with nominally predictable contributions from the previous month’s sudden stratospheric warming and the Madden–Julian oscillation. When run as a climate model, the LIM estimates that the February 2021 CAO was in the top 1% of CAO severity and suggests that similarly extreme CAOs could be expected to occur approximately every 20–30 years.
Abstract
The sources of predictability for the February 2021 cold air outbreak (CAO) over the central United States, which led to power grid failures and water delivery shortages in Texas, are diagnosed using a machine learning–based prediction model called a linear inverse model (LIM). The flexibility and low computational cost of the LIM allows its forecasts to be used for identifying and assessing the predictability of key physical processes. The LIM may also be run as a climate model for sensitivity and risk analysis for the same reasons. The February 2021 CAO was a subseasonal forecast of opportunity, as the LIM confidently predicted the CAO’s onset and duration four weeks in advance, up to two weeks earlier than other initialized numerical forecast models. The LIM shows that the February 2021 CAO was principally caused by unpredictable internal atmospheric variability and predictable La Niña teleconnections, with nominally predictable contributions from the previous month’s sudden stratospheric warming and the Madden–Julian oscillation. When run as a climate model, the LIM estimates that the February 2021 CAO was in the top 1% of CAO severity and suggests that similarly extreme CAOs could be expected to occur approximately every 20–30 years.
Abstract
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2018 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Abstract
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2018 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Abstract
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2019 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Abstract
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2019 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Editors note: For easy download the posted pdf of the Explaining Extreme Events of 2016 is a very low-resolution file. A high-resolution copy of the report is available by clicking here. Please be patient as it may take a few minutes for the high-resolution file to download.
Abstract
Flash droughts, characterized by their unusually rapid intensification, have garnered increasing attention within the weather, climate, agriculture, and ecological communities in recent years due to their large environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Because flash droughts intensify quickly, they require different early warning capabilities and management approaches than are typically used for slower-developing “conventional” droughts. In this essay, we describe an integrated research-and-applications agenda that emphasizes the need to reconceptualize our understanding of flash drought within existing drought early warning systems by focusing on opportunities to improve monitoring and prediction. We illustrate the need for engagement among physical scientists, social scientists, operational monitoring and forecast centers, practitioners, and policy-makers to inform how they view, monitor, predict, plan for, and respond to flash drought. We discuss five related topics that together constitute the pillars of a robust flash drought early warning system, including the development of 1) a physically based identification framework, 2) comprehensive drought monitoring capabilities, and 3) improved prediction over various time scales that together 4) aid impact assessments and 5) guide decision-making and policy. We provide specific recommendations to illustrate how this fivefold approach could be used to enhance decision-making capabilities of practitioners, develop new areas of research, and provide guidance to policy-makers attempting to account for flash drought in drought preparedness and response plans.
Abstract
Flash droughts, characterized by their unusually rapid intensification, have garnered increasing attention within the weather, climate, agriculture, and ecological communities in recent years due to their large environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Because flash droughts intensify quickly, they require different early warning capabilities and management approaches than are typically used for slower-developing “conventional” droughts. In this essay, we describe an integrated research-and-applications agenda that emphasizes the need to reconceptualize our understanding of flash drought within existing drought early warning systems by focusing on opportunities to improve monitoring and prediction. We illustrate the need for engagement among physical scientists, social scientists, operational monitoring and forecast centers, practitioners, and policy-makers to inform how they view, monitor, predict, plan for, and respond to flash drought. We discuss five related topics that together constitute the pillars of a robust flash drought early warning system, including the development of 1) a physically based identification framework, 2) comprehensive drought monitoring capabilities, and 3) improved prediction over various time scales that together 4) aid impact assessments and 5) guide decision-making and policy. We provide specific recommendations to illustrate how this fivefold approach could be used to enhance decision-making capabilities of practitioners, develop new areas of research, and provide guidance to policy-makers attempting to account for flash drought in drought preparedness and response plans.
