Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for :

  • Author or Editor: Kyle R. Clem x
  • Journal of Climate x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
Kyle R. Clem
and
James A. Renwick

Abstract

Significant austral spring trends have previously been observed in West Antarctica and Antarctic Peninsula temperatures and in atmospheric circulation across the southern Pacific and Atlantic. Here, physical mechanisms for the observed trends are investigated through analysis of monthly circulation and temperatures from the ERA-Interim dataset and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) data. The negative pressure trend over the South Pacific during spring is strongest in September, while the positive pressure trend over the South Atlantic is strongest in October. Pressure trends in November are generally nonsignificant. The authors demonstrate that a significant September trend toward increased convection (reduced OLR) in the poleward portion of the South Pacific convergence zone (SPCZ) is statistically related to Rossby wave–like circulation changes across the southern oceans. The wave response is strongest over the South Pacific in September and propagates eastward to the South Atlantic in October. OLR-related changes are linearly congruent with around half of the observed total changes in circulation during September and October and are consistent with observed trends in South Pacific sea ice concentration and surface temperature over western West Antarctica and the western Antarctic Peninsula. These results suggest SPCZ variability in early spring, especially on the poleward side of the SPCZ, is an important contributor to circulation and surface temperature trends across the South Pacific/Atlantic and West Antarctica.

Full access
Kyle R. Clem
,
James A. Renwick
, and
James McGregor

Abstract

Using empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis and atmospheric reanalyses, the principal patterns of seasonal West Antarctic surface air temperature (SAT) and their connection to sea ice and the Amundsen Sea low (ASL) are examined. During austral summer, the leading EOF (EOF1) explains 35% of West Antarctic SAT variability and consists of a widespread SAT anomaly over the continent linked to persistent sea ice concentration anomalies over the Ross and Amundsen Seas from the previous spring. Outside of summer, EOF1 (explaining ~40%–50% of the variability) consists of an east–west dipole over the continent with SAT anomalies over the Antarctic Peninsula opposite those over western West Antarctica. The dipole is tied to variability in the southern annular mode (SAM) and in-phase El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)/SAM combinations that influence the depth of the ASL over the central Amundsen Sea (near 105°W). The second EOF (EOF2) during autumn, winter, and spring (explaining ~15%–20% of the variability) consists of a dipole shifted approximately 30° west of EOF1 with a widespread SAT anomaly over the continent. During winter and spring, EOF2 is closely tied to variability in ENSO and a tropically forced wave train that influences the ASL in the western Amundsen/eastern Ross Seas (near 135°W) with an opposite-sign circulation anomaly over the Weddell Sea; the ENSO-related circulation brings anomalous thermal advection deep onto the continent. The authors conclude that the ENSO-only circulation pattern is associated with SAT variability across interior West Antarctica, especially during winter and spring, whereas the SAM circulation pattern is associated with an SAT dipole over the continent.

Full access
Andrew Orr
,
Pranab Deb
,
Kyle R. Clem
,
Ella Gilbert
,
David H. Bromwich
,
Fredrik Boberg
,
Steve Colwell
,
Nicolaj Hansen
,
Matthew A. Lazzara
,
Priscilla A. Mooney
,
Ruth Mottram
,
Masashi Niwano
,
Tony Phillips
,
Denys Pishniak
,
Carleen H. Reijmer
,
Willem Jan van de Berg
,
Stuart Webster
, and
Xun Zou

Abstract

We calculate a regional surface “melt potential” index (MPI) over Antarctic ice shelves that describes the frequency (MPI-freq; %) and intensity (MPI-int; K) of daily maximum summer temperatures exceeding a melt threshold of 273.15 K. This is used to determine which ice shelves are vulnerable to melt-induced hydrofracture and is calculated using near-surface temperature output for each summer from 1979/80 to 2018/19 from two high-resolution regional atmospheric model hindcasts (using the MetUM and HIRHAM5). MPI is highest for Antarctic Peninsula ice shelves (MPI-freq 23%–35%, MPI-int 1.2–2.1 K), lowest (2%–3%, <0 K) for the Ronne–Filchner and Ross ice shelves, and around 10%–24% and 0.6–1.7 K for the other West and East Antarctic ice shelves. Hotspots of MPI are apparent over many ice shelves, and they also show a decreasing trend in MPI-freq. The regional circulation patterns associated with high MPI values over West and East Antarctic ice shelves are remarkably consistent for their respective region but tied to different large-scale climate forcings. The West Antarctic circulation resembles the central Pacific El Niño pattern with a stationary Rossby wave and a strong anticyclone over the high-latitude South Pacific. By contrast, the East Antarctic circulation comprises a zonally symmetric negative Southern Annular Mode pattern with a strong regional anticyclone on the plateau and enhanced coastal easterlies/weakened Southern Ocean westerlies. Values of MPI are 3–4 times larger for a lower temperature/melt threshold of 271.15 K used in a sensitivity test, as melting can occur at temperatures lower than 273.15 K depending on snowpack properties.

Open access
Jonathan D. Wille
,
Simon P. Alexander
,
Charles Amory
,
Rebecca Baiman
,
Léonard Barthélemy
,
Dana M. Bergstrom
,
Alexis Berne
,
Hanin Binder
,
Juliette Blanchet
,
Deniz Bozkurt
,
Thomas J. Bracegirdle
,
Mathieu Casado
,
Taejin Choi
,
Kyle R. Clem
,
Francis Codron
,
Rajashree Datta
,
Stefano Di Battista
,
Vincent Favier
,
Diana Francis
,
Alexander D. Fraser
,
Elise Fourré
,
René D. Garreaud
,
Christophe Genthon
,
Irina V. Gorodetskaya
,
Sergi González-Herrero
,
Victoria J. Heinrich
,
Guillaume Hubert
,
Hanna Joos
,
Seong-Joong Kim
,
John C. King
,
Christoph Kittel
,
Amaelle Landais
,
Matthew Lazzara
,
Gregory H. Leonard
,
Jan L. Lieser
,
Michelle Maclennan
,
David Mikolajczyk
,
Peter Neff
,
Inès Ollivier
,
Ghislain Picard
,
Benjamin Pohl
,
Martin F. Ralph
,
Penny Rowe
,
Elisabeth Schlosser
,
Christine A. Shields
,
Inga J. Smith
,
Michael Sprenger
,
Luke Trusel
,
Danielle Udy
,
Tessa Vance
,
Étienne Vignon
,
Catherine Walker
,
Nander Wever
, and
Xun Zou

Abstract

Between March 15-19, 2022, East Antarctica experienced an exceptional heatwave with widespread 30-40° C temperature anomalies across the ice sheet. In Part I, we assessed the meteorological drivers that generated an intense atmospheric river (AR) which caused these record-shattering temperature anomalies. Here in Part II, we continue our large, collaborative study by analyzing the widespread and diverse impacts driven by the AR landfall.

These impacts included widespread rain and surface melt which was recorded along coastal areas, but this was outweighed by widespread, high snowfall accumulations resulting in a largely positive surface mass balance contribution to the East Antarctic region. An analysis of the surface energy budget indicated that widespread downward longwave radiation anomalies caused by large cloud-liquid water contents along with some scattered solar radiation produced intense surface warming. Isotope measurements of the moisture were highly elevated, likely imprinting a strong signal for past climate reconstructions. The AR event attenuated cosmic ray measurements at Concordia, something previously never observed. Finally, an extratropical cyclone west of the AR landfall likely triggered the final collapse of the critically unstable Conger Ice Shelf while further reducing an already record low sea-ice extent.

Restricted access
Jonathan D. Wille
,
Simon P. Alexander
,
Charles Amory
,
Rebecca Baiman
,
Léonard Barthélemy
,
Dana M. Bergstrom
,
Alexis Berne
,
Hanin Binder
,
Juliette Blanchet
,
Deniz Bozkurt
,
Thomas J. Bracegirdle
,
Mathieu Casado
,
Taejin Choi
,
Kyle R. Clem
,
Francis Codron
,
Rajashree Datta
,
Stefano Di Battista
,
Vincent Favier
,
Diana Francis
,
Alexander D. Fraser
,
Elise Fourré
,
René D. Garreaud
,
Christophe Genthon
,
Irina V. Gorodetskaya
,
Sergi González-Herrero
,
Victoria J. Heinrich
,
Guillaume Hubert
,
Hanna Joos
,
Seong-Joong Kim
,
John C. King
,
Christoph Kittel
,
Amaelle Landais
,
Matthew Lazzara
,
Gregory H. Leonard
,
Jan L. Lieser
,
Michelle Maclennan
,
David Mikolajczyk
,
Peter Neff
,
Inès Ollivier
,
Ghislain Picard
,
Benjamin Pohl
,
Martin F. Ralph
,
Penny Rowe
,
Elisabeth Schlosser
,
Christine A. Shields
,
Inga J. Smith
,
Michael Sprenger
,
Luke Trusel
,
Danielle Udy
,
Tessa Vance
,
Étienne Vignon
,
Catherine Walker
,
Nander Wever
, and
Xun Zou

Abstract

Between March 15-19, 2022, East Antarctica experienced an exceptional heatwave with widespread 30-40° C temperature anomalies across the ice sheet. This record-shattering event saw numerous monthly temperature records being broken including a new all-time temperature record of -9.4° C on March 18 at Concordia Station despite March typically being a transition month to the Antarctic coreless winter. The driver for these temperature extremes was an intense atmospheric river advecting subtropical/mid-latitude heat and moisture deep into the Antarctic interior. The scope of the temperature records spurred a large, diverse collaborative effort to study the heatwave’s meteorological drivers, impacts, and historical climate context.

Here we focus on describing those temperature records along with the intricate meteorological drivers that led to the most intense atmospheric river observed over East Antarctica. These efforts describe the Rossby wave activity forced from intense tropical convection over the Indian Ocean. This led to an atmospheric river and warm conveyor belt intensification near the coastline which reinforced atmospheric blocking deep into East Antarctica. The resulting moisture flux and upper-level warm air advection eroded the typical surface temperature inversions over the ice sheet. At the peak of the heatwave, an area of 3.3 million km2 in East Antarctica exceeded previous March monthly temperature records. Despite a temperature anomaly return time of about one hundred years, a closer recurrence of such an event is possible under future climate projections. In a subsequent manuscript, we describe the various impacts this extreme event had on the East Antarctic cryosphere.

Restricted access