Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Author or Editor: Markus Furger x
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
Lionel P. Poggio
,
Markus Furger
,
AndréS. H. Prévôt
,
Werner K. Graber
, and
Edgar L. Andreas

Abstract

Several large-aperture scintillometers were built at the Paul Scherrer Institute with the aim to measure wind over complex terrain. A prototype instrument was tested over flat ground, and the performance of six analyzing techniques was evaluated by comparing them with conventional anemometers. Next, a set of five improved scintillometers was used in an experiment over complex terrain. This experiment represents a unique opportunity for evaluating scintillometer performance by comparing their results to sodar, aircraft, and ground station measurements. The results complement and partly contradict the observations previously published; the so-called peak technique is the most reliable and frequency techniques fail to provide faithful results in many cases. The measurements demonstrate that scintillometry is useful and reliable for wind and turbulence measurements over complex terrain.

Full access
Markus Furger
,
Philippe Drobinski
,
AndréS. H. Prévôt
,
Rudolf O. Weber
,
Werner K. Graber
, and
Bruno Neininger

Abstract

Measurements of the horizontal and vertical wind component by a crosswind scintillometer during foehn, the chinooklike downslope windstorm in the Alps, are presented. Because of the sparsity of vertical velocity measurements in the immediate vicinity, the scintillometer calibration is checked mainly with horizontal wind measurements. Then it is assumed that the calibration is the same for both components. The concept was tested during the Mesoscale Alpine Programme field campaign in the autumn of 1999, during which two scintillometers were deployed. Strong, long-lasting, quasi-stationary downward motions on the order of 5 m s−1 and horizontal wind speeds of over 30 m s−1 were detected during strong foehn phases within the valley. Aircraft measurements of various transects near the light paths are compared with two crosswind evaluation techniques. One of them, the slope method, tends to overestimate the actual wind speed by about 20%, whereas the peak technique gives values that are about 10% too low for high wind speeds. The peak method also fails to measure meaningful vertical crosswind speeds. The scintillometer data of one particular foehn storm are compared with nearby Doppler lidar data. The agreement of the horizontal measurements is reasonable. Discrepancies are attributed to topographic and dynamic effects that cause significant spatial inhomogeneities in the wind field. The applicability of continuous scintillometer vertical crosswind measurements in mountainous terrain is demonstrated.

Full access