Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Author or Editor: Aaron Levine x
  • Monthly Weather Review x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
Chidong Zhang
,
Aaron F. Levine
,
Muyin Wang
,
Chelle Gentemann
,
Calvin W. Mordy
,
Edward D. Cokelet
,
Philip A. Browne
,
Qiong Yang
,
Noah Lawrence-Slavas
,
Christian Meinig
,
Gregory Smith
,
Andy Chiodi
,
Dongxiao Zhang
,
Phyllis Stabeno
,
Wanqiu Wang
,
Hong-Li Ren
,
K. Andrew Peterson
,
Silvio N. Figueroa
,
Michael Steele
,
Neil P. Barton
,
Andrew Huang
, and
Hyun-Cheol Shin

Abstract

Observations from uncrewed surface vehicles (saildrones) in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas during June–September 2019 were used to evaluate initial conditions and forecasts with lead times up to 10 days produced by eight operational numerical weather prediction centers. Prediction error behaviors in pressure and wind are found to be different from those in temperature and humidity. For example, errors in surface pressure were small in short-range (<6 days) forecasts, but they grew rapidly with increasing lead time beyond 6 days. Non-weighted multimodel means outperformed all individual models approaching a 10-day forecast lead time. In contrast, errors in surface air temperature and relative humidity could be large in initial conditions and remained large through 10-day forecasts without much growth, and non-weighted multimodel means did not outperform all individual models. These results following the tracks of the mobile platforms are consistent with those at a fixed location. Large errors in initial condition of sea surface temperature (SST) resulted in part from the unusual Arctic surface warming in 2019 not captured by data assimilation systems used for model initialization. These errors in SST led to large initial and prediction errors in surface air temperature. Our results suggest that improving predictions of surface conditions over the Arctic Ocean requires enhanced in situ observations and better data assimilation capability for more accurate initial conditions as well as better model physics. Numerical predictions of Arctic atmospheric conditions may continue to suffer from large errors if they do not fully capture the large SST anomalies related to Arctic warming.

Restricted access