Search Results

You are looking at 41 - 50 of 2,461 items for :

  • Arctic Oscillation x
  • Journal of Climate x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Ran Zhang, Jiabei Fang, and Xiu-Qun Yang

-day lead ( Figs. 2a,f ), featuring a negative-phase Arctic Oscillation (AO) pattern ( Thompson and Wallace 1998 ). With time evolution (lead time from day −80 to day 0), the regional negative (positive) geopotential height anomaly centers over both North Pacific and southeast North America (northwest North America and around Hawaii) become clear, resembling a positive-phase Pacific–North American (PNA) pattern. Meanwhile, a negative-phase North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) anomaly pattern gradually

Open access
XiaoJing Jia, Hai Lin, and Xia Yao

regions nearby ( Rogers 1990 ; Hurrell 1995 , 1996 ). Although there exists some debate, many regard NAO as a regional display of the Arctic Oscillation (AO), which was defined first by Thompson and Wallace (1998) . It is well accepted that the AO/NAO is, to a significant degree, an internal mode of variability of the atmospheric circulation. The spatial structure and amplitude of the AO/NAO can be well simulated in atmospheric general circulation models (AGCM) forced with fixed external forcing

Full access
Marika M. Holland

appear to be interrelated and to be associated with variability and trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) or the closely related Arctic Oscillation (AO; Thompson and Wallace 1998 ). The North Atlantic Oscillation is the dominant mode of variability in the North Atlantic region and represents a redistribution of atmospheric mass between centers of action located near the Azores high and the Icelandic low. A high NAO phase indicates a strengthening of the Azores high and the Icelandic low

Full access
Maria Flatau and Young-Joon Kim

1. Introduction The Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is primarily a tropical phenomenon, with its influence extending to the extratropics through the teleconnection reaching the polar regions in both hemispheres. This interaction appears to be stronger in the Northern Hemisphere (NH), where the largest MJO amplitudes coincide with the winter circulation. There is some evidence that the MJO influences the southern as well as northern polar regions. An MJO influence on the Arctic Oscillation (AO

Full access
R. G. Graversen

ice volume has decreased by 40% relative to the situation prevalent from the 1940s through the 1970s ( Rothrock et al. 1999 ). Rigor et al. (2002) report that, in both the summer and winter season, changes of the wind stress might have given rise to larger areas with thin ice and leads in the eastern part of the Arctic Ocean that, in turn, possibly have contributed to the observed warming there. In the winter season, the changes of the wind stress are related to changes of the Arctic Oscillation

Full access
R. R. Dickson, T. J. Osborn, J. W. Hurrell, J. Meincke, J. Blindheim, B. Adlandsvik, T. Vinje, G. Alekseev, and W. Maslowski

(1998 , 2000 ; Thompson et al. 2000) suggested that the NAO may be the regional manifestation of an annular (zonally symmetric) hemispheric mode of variability characterized by a seesaw of atmospheric mass between the polar cap and the middle latitudes in both the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean basins. A very similar structure is also evident in the Southern Hemisphere. They named this mode the Arctic Oscillation (AO) and showed that, during winter, its vertical structure extends deep into the

Full access
Linhao Zhong, Lijuan Hua, and Dehai Luo

contributes the most significantly to the BKS sea ice melting and warming because there is almost no concurrent downward IR increase found ( Fig. 8c ), which again suggests that the high local moisture contribution is only a manifestation of the sea ice melting. Corresponding to high local moisture contribution, the circulation ( Fig. 8d ) has a negative-phase Arctic Oscillation (AO−)-like pattern with an eastward-displaced positive anomaly that partly covers the BKS and with two negative anomalies

Full access
Claude Frankignoul, Nathalie Sennéchael, and Pierre Cauchy

1. Introduction There is increasing evidence that the seasonal to decadal sea ice changes superimposed on the observed decline in Arctic sea ice cover affect the atmospheric circulation. Model studies have suggested that North Atlantic sea ice anomalies influence the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)/Arctic Oscillation (AO) and the North Atlantic storm track ( Magnusdottir et al. 2004 ; Alexander et al. 2004 ; Kvamstø et al. 2004 ), while North Pacific sea ice primarily influences the

Full access
Cecilia Peralta-Ferriz, James H. Morison, John M. Wallace, Jennifer A. Bonin, and Jinlun Zhang

concern given their possible linkages with global climate, for example by controlling stratification in the sub-Arctic seas and thereby modulating convection and the meridional overturning circulation ( Aagaard and Carmack 1989 ; Hu et al. 2010 ). These changes have been linked to the Arctic Ocean circulation and climate variability ( Morison et al. 2000 , 2006 ). During the late 1980s and early 1990s, the leading mode of hemispheric surface atmospheric pressure, the Arctic Oscillation (AO

Full access
R. Kwok

, between Svalbard and Fraz Josef Land (S–FJL) and between Franz Josef Land and Severnaya Zemlya (FJL–SZ), into the Barents Sea. Section 5 discusses the net sea ice outflow into the Greenland and Barents Seas and considers how the outflows are related to changes in the sea ice circulation pattern in the Arctic Ocean and indices of atmospheric oscillations. The last section concludes the paper. 2. Motion fields, flux estimates, and ancillary data To estimate the outflow of Arctic sea ice into the

Full access