Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 12 items for :

  • Journal of Climate x
  • Corrigendum x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Achim Stössel

The results in Stössel (2008) are based on simulations with a global sea ice–ocean general circulation model (GCM) in which the Southern Ocean sea ice component has a higher resolution than the ocean model. Recently, I discovered that the acceleration due to the Coriolis force in the sea ice momentum balance of the high-resolution Southern Ocean sea ice component has erroneously not been engaged. Interestingly, the only noticeable difference to the results presented in Stössel (2008

Full access
Alexey Yu Karpechko, Nathan P. Gillett, Gareth J. Marshall, and James A. Screen

referred to as SGE06 ), and sea ice concentration ( Lefebvre et al. 2004 ; Liu et al. 2004 ). Screen et al. (2009b) also showed that model resolution does not strongly impact the short-term SST response to the SAM in an ocean model run at various horizontal resolutions. Screen et al. (2009a) showed that the observed negative SST response over the Pacific is associated with negative anomalies in the observed atmosphere-to-ocean heat fluxes, and the observed positive SST response east of Drake

Full access
Clio Michel, Annick Terpstra, and Thomas Spengler

In Michel et al. (2018) , there was a mistake in the Arctic sea ice extent (ASIE) calculation, leading to a few deviations in section 5b, though without changing the overall results. Equation (8) , Table 2 , Fig. 13 , and the affected parts of the text in section 5b should be as follows. Table 2. North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Scandinavian blocking (SB), and Arctic sea ice extent (ASIE) indices averaged over the genesis dates for PMCs along with their standard deviations for all polar

Full access
Axel J. Schweiger, Ron W. Lindsay, Steve Vavrus, and Jennifer A. Francis

Incorrect versions of Figs. 5 and 8 in Schweiger et al. (2008) were published in which there were errors in the axis labels. The correct versions of Figs. 5 and 8 are presented below. REFERENCE Schweiger , A. J. , R. W. Lindsay , S. Vavrus , and J. A. Francis , 2008 : Relationships between Arctic Sea ice and clouds during autumn. J. Climate , 21 , 4799 – 4810 . Fig . 5. Composites of temperature profiles for locations with above-normal (+0.5 σ ) and below-normal (−0.5 σ

Full access
Marius Årthun, Tor Eldevik, and Lars H. Smedsrud

trends. Dots indicate where the ensemble trend correlation is significant at the 95% confidence level. REFERENCE Årthun , M. , T. Eldevik , and L. H. Smedsrud , 2019 : The role of Atlantic heat transport in future Arctic winter sea ice loss . J. Climate , 32 , 3327 – 3341 , https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0750.1 . 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0750.1

Restricted access

regrets any inconvenience this error may have caused. Fig . 4. (left) Zonally averaged annual meridional overturning streamfunction (Sv) for the Atlantic Ocean from (a) the ocean- and sea ice–alone run years 75–84 (just before the coupling), and from the coupled PCM control run for model years (b) 80–84 and (c) 1070–1099. (right) SST (color, °C) and top 100-m-averaged ocean currents (arrows) in the North Atlantic Ocean simulated by the PCM from (d) the ocean- and sea ice–alone run years 75–84, and

Full access
Jake Aylmer, David Ferreira, and Daniel Feltham

should be 1.21 m, which remains a reasonable value. Using the unweighted average in Eq. (13) of A20 amounts to a 1% difference in the estimate of s o / s a compared to using the correct average. Testing of Eq. (13) of A20 with different values of B OLR and B dn (appendix B of A20 ) still yields estimates of s o / s a accurate to within 5% of the (corrected) experimentally derived values. Fig . 2. (b) Area-weighted mean sea ice thickness in the EBM (black, solid), compared to observations

Open access
Doug M. Smith, Nick J. Dunstone, Adam A. Scaife, Emma K. Fiedler, Dan Copsey, and Steven C. Hardiman

the response to reduced sea ice in (b),(f) AMIP (c),(g) CPLD, and (d),(h) AMIP_CPLD. Color shading shows (top) the vertical EP flux (10 6 kg s −2 ) and (bottom) the EP flux divergence (m s −1 day −1 ). Arrows show the EP flux vector (scaled by dividing by density to aid visualization). Black contours show climatological winds (contour interval 5 m s −1 ; negative contours are dashed). REFERENCE Smith , D. M. , N. J. Dunstone , A. A. Scaife , E. K. Fiedler , D. Copsey , and S. C

Full access
C. M. Bitz, P. R. Gent, R. A. Woodgate, M. M. Holland, and R. Lindsay

: The influence of sea ice on ocean heat uptake in response to increasing CO 2 . J. Climate , 19 , 2437 – 2450 .

Full access
Steven B. Feldstein and Sukyoung Lee

, S. B. , and S. Lee , 2014 : Intraseasonal and interdecadal jet shifts in the Northern Hemisphere: The role of warm pool tropical convection and sea ice . J. Climate , 27 , 6497 – 6518 , doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00057.1 .

Full access