Search Results
Abstract
Obtaining quality air temperature measurements in complex mesoscale environments, such as thunderstorms or frontal zones, is problematic and is particularly challenging from a moving platform. For some time, mobile weather platforms known as mobile mesonets (MMs) have used custom aspirated temperature shields. The original design was known as the “J-tube,” which addresses some but not all of the unique problems associated with mobile temperature measurements. For VORTEX2 2009, a second, well-documented shield, the R.M. Young (RMY) 43408, was included but was also found to have certain shortcomings in some severe weather environments. Between the end of VORTEX2 2009 and the start of VORTEX2 2010, a third and new shield called the “U-tube” was designed, tested, and installed. Reported here are the results of efforts to better characterize the J-Tube, RMY 43408, and U-tube. Several tests designed to isolate key aspects of a radiation shield’s performance, such as performance in rain, high solar radiation, varying wind conditions, and general response time, were completed. A period of intercomparison among the three shields during the 2010 season of VORTEX2 is also used to highlight each shield being used in “real world” conditions. Results indicate that the U-tube has several significant advantages over the J-tube and 43408 in terms of aspiration rate, sampling efficiency, performance during rain, variable winds, and high solar radiation periods, as well as response time. Given these results, the U-tube should be utilized for mobile observations going forward.
Abstract
Obtaining quality air temperature measurements in complex mesoscale environments, such as thunderstorms or frontal zones, is problematic and is particularly challenging from a moving platform. For some time, mobile weather platforms known as mobile mesonets (MMs) have used custom aspirated temperature shields. The original design was known as the “J-tube,” which addresses some but not all of the unique problems associated with mobile temperature measurements. For VORTEX2 2009, a second, well-documented shield, the R.M. Young (RMY) 43408, was included but was also found to have certain shortcomings in some severe weather environments. Between the end of VORTEX2 2009 and the start of VORTEX2 2010, a third and new shield called the “U-tube” was designed, tested, and installed. Reported here are the results of efforts to better characterize the J-Tube, RMY 43408, and U-tube. Several tests designed to isolate key aspects of a radiation shield’s performance, such as performance in rain, high solar radiation, varying wind conditions, and general response time, were completed. A period of intercomparison among the three shields during the 2010 season of VORTEX2 is also used to highlight each shield being used in “real world” conditions. Results indicate that the U-tube has several significant advantages over the J-tube and 43408 in terms of aspiration rate, sampling efficiency, performance during rain, variable winds, and high solar radiation periods, as well as response time. Given these results, the U-tube should be utilized for mobile observations going forward.
Abstract
Radiosonde observations are used the world over to provide critical upper-air observations of the lower atmosphere. These observations are susceptible to errors that must be mitigated or avoided when identified. One source of error not previously addressed is radiosonde icing in winter storms, which can affect forecasts, warning operations, and model initialization. Under certain conditions, ice can form on the radiosonde, leading to decreased response times and incorrect readings. Evidence of radiosonde icing is presented for a winter storm event in Norman, Oklahoma, on 24 November 2013. A special sounding that included a particle imager probe and a GoPro camera was flown into the system producing ice pellets. While the iced-over temperature sensor showed no evidence of an elevated melting layer (ML), complementary Particle Size, Image, and Velocity (PASIV) probe and polarimetric radar observations provide clear evidence that an ML was indeed present. Radiosonde icing can occur while passing through a layer of supercooled drops, such as frequently found in a subfreezing layer that often lies below the ML in winter storms. Events that have warmer/deeper MLs would likely melt any ice present off the radiosonde, minimizing radiosonde icing and allowing the ML to be detected. This paper discusses the hypothesis that the absence of an ML in the radiosonde data presented here is more likely to occur in winter storms that produce ice pellets, which tend to have cooler/shallower MLs. Where sounding data do appear to be compromised by icing, polarimetric radar data might be used to identify MLs for nowcasting purposes and numerical model initialization.
Abstract
Radiosonde observations are used the world over to provide critical upper-air observations of the lower atmosphere. These observations are susceptible to errors that must be mitigated or avoided when identified. One source of error not previously addressed is radiosonde icing in winter storms, which can affect forecasts, warning operations, and model initialization. Under certain conditions, ice can form on the radiosonde, leading to decreased response times and incorrect readings. Evidence of radiosonde icing is presented for a winter storm event in Norman, Oklahoma, on 24 November 2013. A special sounding that included a particle imager probe and a GoPro camera was flown into the system producing ice pellets. While the iced-over temperature sensor showed no evidence of an elevated melting layer (ML), complementary Particle Size, Image, and Velocity (PASIV) probe and polarimetric radar observations provide clear evidence that an ML was indeed present. Radiosonde icing can occur while passing through a layer of supercooled drops, such as frequently found in a subfreezing layer that often lies below the ML in winter storms. Events that have warmer/deeper MLs would likely melt any ice present off the radiosonde, minimizing radiosonde icing and allowing the ML to be detected. This paper discusses the hypothesis that the absence of an ML in the radiosonde data presented here is more likely to occur in winter storms that produce ice pellets, which tend to have cooler/shallower MLs. Where sounding data do appear to be compromised by icing, polarimetric radar data might be used to identify MLs for nowcasting purposes and numerical model initialization.
Abstract
A balloonborne instrument known as the Particle Size, Image, and Velocity (PASIV) probe has been developed at the National Severe Storms Laboratory to provide in situ microphysical measurements in storms. These observations represent a critical need of microphysics observations for use in lightning studies, cloud microphysics simulations, and dual-polarization radar validation. The instrument weighs approximately 2.72 kg and consists of a high-definition (HD) video camera, a camera viewing chamber, and a modified Particle Size and Velocity (Parsivel) laser disdrometer mounted above the camera viewing chamber. Precipitation particles fall through the Parsivel sampling area and then into the camera viewing chamber, effectively allowing both devices to sample the same particles. The data are collected on board for analysis after retrieval. Taken together, these two instruments are capable of providing a vertical profile of the size, shape, velocity, orientation, and composition of particles along the balloon path within severe weather.
The PASIV probe has been deployed across several types of weather environments, including thunderstorms, supercells, and winter storms. Initial results from two cases in the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry Experiment are shown that demonstrate the ability of the instrument to obtain high-spatiotemporal- resolution observations of the particle size distributions within convection.
Abstract
A balloonborne instrument known as the Particle Size, Image, and Velocity (PASIV) probe has been developed at the National Severe Storms Laboratory to provide in situ microphysical measurements in storms. These observations represent a critical need of microphysics observations for use in lightning studies, cloud microphysics simulations, and dual-polarization radar validation. The instrument weighs approximately 2.72 kg and consists of a high-definition (HD) video camera, a camera viewing chamber, and a modified Particle Size and Velocity (Parsivel) laser disdrometer mounted above the camera viewing chamber. Precipitation particles fall through the Parsivel sampling area and then into the camera viewing chamber, effectively allowing both devices to sample the same particles. The data are collected on board for analysis after retrieval. Taken together, these two instruments are capable of providing a vertical profile of the size, shape, velocity, orientation, and composition of particles along the balloon path within severe weather.
The PASIV probe has been deployed across several types of weather environments, including thunderstorms, supercells, and winter storms. Initial results from two cases in the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry Experiment are shown that demonstrate the ability of the instrument to obtain high-spatiotemporal- resolution observations of the particle size distributions within convection.
Abstract
Results are presented from an intercomparison of temperature, humidity, and wind velocity sensors of the Tempest unmanned aircraft system (UAS) and the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) mobile mesonet (NSSL-MM). Contemporaneous evaluation of sensor performance was facilitated by mounting the Tempest wing with attached sensors to the NSSL-MM instrument rack such that the Tempest and NSSL-MM sensors could collect observations within a nearly identical airstream. This intercomparison was complemented by wind tunnel simulations designed to evaluate the impact of the mobile mesonet vehicle on the observed wind velocity.
The intercomparison revealed strong correspondence between the temperature and relative humidity (RH) data collected by the Tempest and the NSSL-MM with differences generally within sensor accuracies. Larger RH differences were noted in the presence of heavy precipitation; however, despite the exposure of the Tempest temperature and humidity sensor to the airstream, there was no evidence of wet bulbing within precipitation. Wind tunnel simulations revealed that the simulated winds at the location of the NSSL-MM wind monitor were ~4% larger than the expected winds due to the acceleration of the flow over the vehicle. Simulated vertical velocity exceeded 1 m s−1 for tunnel inlet speeds typical of a vehicle moving at highway speeds. However, the theoretical noncosine reduction in winds that should result from the impact of vertical velocity on the laterally mounted wind monitor was found to be negligible across the simulations. Comparison of the simulated and observed results indicates a close correspondence, provided the crosswind component of the flow is small.
Abstract
Results are presented from an intercomparison of temperature, humidity, and wind velocity sensors of the Tempest unmanned aircraft system (UAS) and the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) mobile mesonet (NSSL-MM). Contemporaneous evaluation of sensor performance was facilitated by mounting the Tempest wing with attached sensors to the NSSL-MM instrument rack such that the Tempest and NSSL-MM sensors could collect observations within a nearly identical airstream. This intercomparison was complemented by wind tunnel simulations designed to evaluate the impact of the mobile mesonet vehicle on the observed wind velocity.
The intercomparison revealed strong correspondence between the temperature and relative humidity (RH) data collected by the Tempest and the NSSL-MM with differences generally within sensor accuracies. Larger RH differences were noted in the presence of heavy precipitation; however, despite the exposure of the Tempest temperature and humidity sensor to the airstream, there was no evidence of wet bulbing within precipitation. Wind tunnel simulations revealed that the simulated winds at the location of the NSSL-MM wind monitor were ~4% larger than the expected winds due to the acceleration of the flow over the vehicle. Simulated vertical velocity exceeded 1 m s−1 for tunnel inlet speeds typical of a vehicle moving at highway speeds. However, the theoretical noncosine reduction in winds that should result from the impact of vertical velocity on the laterally mounted wind monitor was found to be negligible across the simulations. Comparison of the simulated and observed results indicates a close correspondence, provided the crosswind component of the flow is small.