Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Lidar observations x
  • Journal of Climate x
  • GFDL'S Coupled Model-3 (CM3): Dynamics, Physical Parameterizations, and Simulations x
  • Refine by Access: Content accessible to me x
Clear All
Leo J. Donner, Bruce L. Wyman, Richard S. Hemler, Larry W. Horowitz, Yi Ming, Ming Zhao, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Paul Ginoux, S.-J. Lin, M. Daniel Schwarzkopf, John Austin, Ghassan Alaka, William F. Cooke, Thomas L. Delworth, Stuart M. Freidenreich, C. T. Gordon, Stephen M. Griffies, Isaac M. Held, William J. Hurlin, Stephen A. Klein, Thomas R. Knutson, Amy R. Langenhorst, Hyun-Chul Lee, Yanluan Lin, Brian I. Magi, Sergey L. Malyshev, P. C. D. Milly, Vaishali Naik, Mary J. Nath, Robert Pincus, Jeffrey J. Ploshay, V. Ramaswamy, Charles J. Seman, Elena Shevliakova, Joseph J. Sirutis, William F. Stern, Ronald J. Stouffer, R. John Wilson, Michael Winton, Andrew T. Wittenberg, and Fanrong Zeng

observations are comparable for longwave cloud forcing, but AM3 has more spatial variability than observed, while AM2 has less. Fig . 11. Taylor diagrams for top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiation balance. The rms errors, correlations, and standard deviations are based on global, annual means. AM3 and CM3 include the Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project’s Observation Simulator Package (COSP; http://cfmip.metoffice.com/ ). Among its components, the package includes simulators for the Cloud–Aerosol Lidar

Full access