Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for :

  • Author or Editor: C. Donlon x
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology x
  • All content x
Clear All Modify Search
J. D. Stark, C. Donlon, A. O’Carroll, and G. Corlett

Abstract

Sea surface temperature (SST) analyses are produced on a daily basis at the Met Office using the Operational SST and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) system. OSTIA uses satellite SST data, provided by international agencies via the Global Ocean Data Assimilation Experiment (GODAE) High-Resolution SST Pilot Project (GHRSST-PP) regional/global task sharing (R/GTS) framework, which includes an estimate of bias error (available online at http://www.ghrsst-pp.org). The OSTIA system produces a foundation SST estimate (SSTfnd), which is the SST that is free of diurnal variability, at a resolution of 1/20° (∼6 km). Global coverage outputs are provided each day in GHRSST-PP L4 netCDF format. The verification and intercomparison of the OSTIA analysis, with observations and analyses, has revealed a cold bias of approximately 0.1 K in the OSTIA outputs. Because OSTIA uses the operational 1-km Envisat Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) ATS_NR_2P data [via the GHRSST-PP/European Space Agency (ESA) Medspiration Project, available online at http://www.medspiration.org] as a reference dataset for bias adjustment of other satellite data, the AATSR data were identified as the likely cause of the observed bias. To test this, a series of experiments were carried out in June 2006 using the Medspiration AATSR observations in which the Single Sensor Error Statistics (SSES) bias estimate was assigned fixed magnitudes of 0.0, 0.05, 0.15, and 0.2 K. The authors find that the AATSR data have approximately zero bias relative to in situ buoys. Because AATSR measures the SST skin temperature (SSTskin) and was given a mean global SSTskin deviation of −0.17 K (based on in situ radiometer data), this result suggests that ATS_NR_2P SSTskin data have a warm bias of 0.17 K. Using a matchup database of near-contemporaneous 10 arc min AATSR and in situ data, the authors find that the AATSR SSTskin dual- and triple-window retrievals have a warm bias of 0.14 and 0.17 K, respectively, between August 2002 and July 2006. The results of the experiments confirm that the current Medspiration SSES bias correction provided with the Medspiration AATSR L2P observations is poorly specified. The database was not configured to test the relationship between the cloud proximity confidence value and the AATSR bias error. Based on the matchup database and reanalysis results, the authors suggest that Medspiration be modified to use an SSES bias estimate of 0.17 K for all category 2–6 proximity confidence values for the current AATSR dual-view SST ATS_NR_2P products to provide a correct SSTskin estimate. In response to the results presented in this study, operational changes have been made to the Medspiration processing, which improve the bias estimates provided in the AATSR data. The authors suggest that a concerted effort be invested to develop the most appropriate SSES for the AATSR class of sensors that have specific characteristics that must be included in the SSES estimation scheme. The main elements of such a scheme are presented in this paper.

Full access
C. J. Donlon, T. Nightingale, L. Fiedler, G. Fisher, D. Baldwin, and I. S. Robinson

Abstract

There are many infrared radiometer systems available for the measurement of in situ sea surface skin temperature (SSST). Unfortunately, the marine environment is extremely hostile to optical components, and to ensure the accuracy of SSST measurements, an absolute calibration of instrumentation using an independent calibration reference is required both before and after any sea deployment. During extended deployments it is prudent to have additional regular calibration data to monitor instrument performance characteristics. This paper presents a design for an ambient temperature (278–325 K), wide aperture (100 mm), reference blackbody unit that may be used to calibrate a variety of sea-going infrared radiometer systems both in the laboratory and in the field. The blackbody consists of a spun copper cavity coated with well-characterized high emissivity paint (Mankiewicz Nextel Velvet Coating 811-21) immersed in a water bath that is continuously mixed using a strong water pump. The radiant temperature of the blackbody cavity is determined from the measured water bath temperature. Results derived from validation and intercomparison experiments show this blackbody design to be an accurate and reliable reference blackbody source. However, in order to ensure that the best possible calibration data are obtained, extreme care must be taken to ensure the accurate measurement of the water bath temperature, proper positioning of a radiometer in front of the cavity itself, and prevention of condensation on the cavity surface. Four blackbody units have been specifically built for the European Union combined action for the study of the ocean thermal skin (CASOTS) program. Using these units as reference radiance sources, the authors describe the strategy adopted and present results obtained from the CASOTS radiometer intercalibration experiment. These results highlight the need to obtain independent calibration data both before and after sea-going radiometer deployments and the need to standardize field radiometer calibration protocols.

Full access
C. Donlon, I. S. Robinson, W. Wimmer, G. Fisher, M. Reynolds, R. Edwards, and T. J. Nightingale

Abstract

The infrared SST autonomous radiometer (ISAR) is a self-calibrating instrument capable of measuring in situ sea surface skin temperature (SSTskin) to an accuracy of 0.1 K. Extensive field deployments alongside two independent research radiometers measuring SSTskin using different spectral and geometric configurations show that, relatively, ISAR SSTskin has a zero bias ±0.14 K rms. The ISAR instrument has been developed for satellite SST validation and other scientific programs. The ISAR can be deployed continuously on voluntary observing ships (VOS) without any service requirement or operator intervention for periods of up to 3 months. Five ISAR instruments have been built and are in sustained use in the United States, China, and Europe. This paper describes the ISAR instrument including the special design features that enabled a single channel radiometer with a spectral bandpass of 9.6–11.5 μm to be adapted for autonomous use. The entire instrument infrared optical path is calibrated by viewing two blackbody reference cavities at different temperatures to maintain high accuracy while tolerating moderate contamination of optical components by salt deposition. During bad weather, an innovative storm shutter, triggered by a sensitive optical rain gauge, automatically seals the instrument from the external environment. Data are presented that verify the instrument calibration and functionality in such situations. A watchdog timer and auto-reboot function support automatic data logging recovery in case of power outages typically encountered on ships. An RS485 external port allows supporting instruments that are not part of the core ISAR package (e.g., a solarimeter) to be logged using the ISAR system. All data are processed by the ISAR instrument and are relayed to a host computer via the RS232 serial link as (National Electronics Manufacturers Association) NEMA-style strings allowing easy integration into many commercial onboard scientific data logging systems. In case of a communications failure, data are stored on board using a CompactFlash card that can be retrieved when the instrument is serviced. The success of the design is demonstrated using results obtained over 21 months in the English Channel and Bay of Biscay as part of a campaign to validate SSTskin observations derived from the Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR).

Full access
C. J. Donlon, S. J. Keogh, D. J. Baldwin, I. S. Robinson, I. Ridley, T. Sheasby, I. J. Barton, E. F. Bradley, T. J. Nightingale, and W. Emery

Abstract

Satellite sea surface skin temperature (SSST) maps are readily available from precisely calibrated radiometer systems such as the ERS along-track scanning radiometer and, in the near future, from the moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer. However, the use of subsurface bulk sea surface temperature (BSST) measurements as the primary source of in situ data required for the development of new sea surface temperature algorithms and the accurate validation of these global datasets is questionable. This is because BSST measurements are not a measure of the sea surface skin temperature, which is actually observed by a satellite infrared radiometer. Consequently, the use of BSST data for validation and derivation of satellite derived “pseudo-BSST” and SSST datasets will limit their accuracy to at least the rms deviation of the BSST–SSST difference, typically about ±0.5 K. Unfortunately, the prohibitive cost and difficulty of deploying infrared radiometers at sea has prevented the regular collection of a comprehensive global satellite SSST validation dataset. In response to this situation, an assessment of the TASCO THI-500L infrared radiometer system as a potential candidate for the widespread validation of satellite SSST observations is presented. This is a low-cost, broadband radiometer that has been commonly deployed in the field to measure SSST by several research groups. A comparison between SSST derived from TASCO THI-500L measurements and contemporaneous scanning infrared sea surface temperature radiometer measurements, which are accurate to better than 0.1 K, demonstrates low bias (0.1 K) and rms (0.08 K) differences between the two instruments. However, to achieve this accuracy, the TASCO THI-500L radiometer must be deployed with care to ensure that the radiometer fore-optics are kept free of salt water contamination and shaded from direct sunlight. When this is done, this type of low-cost radiometer system could form the core of a global SSST validation program.

Full access
I. J. Barton, P. J. Minnett, K. A. Maillet, C. J. Donlon, S. J. Hook, A. T. Jessup, and T. J. Nightingale

Abstract

The second calibration and intercomparison of infrared radiometers (Miami2001) was held at the University of Miami's Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS) during a workshop held from May to June 2001. The radiometers targeted in these two campaigns (laboratory-based and at-sea measurements) are those used to validate the skin sea surface temperatures and land surface temperatures derived from the measurements of imaging radiometers on earth observation satellites. These satellite instruments include those on currently operational satellites and others that will be launched within two years following the workshop. The experimental campaigns were completed in one week and included laboratory measurements using blackbody calibration targets characterized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and an intercomparison of the radiometers on a short cruise on board the R/V F. G. Walton Smith in Gulf Stream waters off the eastern coast of Florida. This paper reports on the results obtained from the shipborne measurements.

Seven radiometers were mounted alongside each other on the R/V Walton Smith for an intercomparison under seagoing conditions. The ship results confirm that all radiometers are suitable for the validation of land surface temperature, and the majority are able to provide high quality data for the more difficult validation of satellite-derived sea surface temperature, contributing less than 0.1 K to the error budget of the validation. The measurements provided by two prototype instruments developed for ship-of-opportunity use confirmed their potential to provide regular reliable data for satellite-derived SST validation. Four high quality radiometers showed agreements within 0.05 K confirming that these instruments are suitable for detailed studies of the dynamics of air–sea interaction at the ocean surface as well as providing high quality validation data. The data analysis confirms the importance of including an accurate correction for reflected sky radiance when using infrared radiometers to measure SST. The results presented here also show the value of regular intercomparisons of ground-based instruments that are to be used for the validation of satellite-derived data products—products that will be an essential component of future assessments of climate change and variability.

Full access
J. P. Rice, J. J. Butler, B. C. Johnson, P. J. Minnett, K. A. Maillet, T. J. Nightingale, S. J. Hook, A. Abtahi, C. J. Donlon, and I. J. Barton

Abstract

The second calibration and intercomparison of infrared radiometers (Miami2001) was held at the University of Miami's Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS) during May–June 2001. The participants were from several groups involved with the validation of skin sea surface temperatures and land surface temperatures derived from the measurements of imaging radiometers on earth observation satellites. These satellite instruments include those currently on operational satellites and others that will be launched within two years following the workshop. There were two experimental campaigns carried out during the 1-week workshop: a set of measurements made by a variety of ship-based radiometers on board the Research Vessel F. G. Walton Smith in Gulf Stream waters off the eastern coast of Florida, and a set of laboratory measurements of typical external blackbodies used to calibrate these ship-based radiometers. This paper reports on the results obtained from the laboratory characterization on blackbody sources. A companion paper reports on the at-sea measurements. Five blackbody sources were intercompared by measurements of their brightness temperature using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Thermal-infrared Transfer Radiometer (TXR). Four of these sources are used for calibration of sea surface temperature radiometers. The fifth was a NIST water bath blackbody used for calibration of the TXR. All blackbodies agreed to better than ±0.1°C at blackbody temperatures near the ambient room temperature. Some of the blackbodies had reduced effective emissivity relative to the NIST water bath blackbody, and hence they began to disagree at blackbody temperatures far enough away (>15°C) from the ambient room temperature. For these, relative effective emissivity values were determined so that corrections can be applied if they are used in conditions of nonlaboratory ambient temperatures.

Full access
E. Theocharous, N. P. Fox, I. Barker-Snook, R. Niclòs, V. Garcia Santos, P. J. Minnett, F. M. Göttsche, L. Poutier, N. Morgan, T. Nightingale, W. Wimmer, J. Høyer, K. Zhang, M. Yang, L. Guan, M. Arbelo, and C. J. Donlon

Abstract

To ensure confidence, measurements carried out by imaging radiometers mounted on satellites require robust validation using “fiducial quality” measurements of the same in situ parameter. For surface temperature measurements this is optimally carried out by radiometers measuring radiation emitted in the infrared region of the spectrum, collocated to that of a satellite overpass. For ocean surface temperatures the radiometers are usually on board ships to sample large areas but for land and ice they are typically deployed at defined geographical sites. It is of course critical that the validation measurements and associated instrumentation are internationally consistent and traceable to international standards. The Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) facilitates this process and over the last two decades has organized a series of comparisons, initially to develop and share best practice, but now to assess metrological uncertainties and degree of consistency of all the participants. The fourth CEOS comparison of validation instrumentation: blackbodies and infrared radiometers, was held at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) during June and July 2016, sponsored by the European Space Agency (ESA). The 2016 campaign was completed over a period of three weeks and included not only laboratory-based measurements but also representative measurements carried out in field conditions, over land and water. This paper is one of a series and reports the results obtained when radiometers participating in this comparison were used to measure the radiance temperature of the NPL ammonia heat-pipe blackbody during the 2016 comparison activities (i.e., an assessment of radiometer performance compared to international standards). This comparison showed that the differences between the participating radiometer readings and the corresponding temperature of the reference blackbody were within the uncertainty of the measurements, but there were a few exceptions, particularly for a reference blackbody temperature of −30°C. Reasons that give rise to the discrepancies observed at the low blackbody temperatures were identified.

Full access