Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Author or Editor: J. C. Ballard x
  • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
C. W. P. Palmer, P. Venters, R. J. Knight, J. Ballard, T. J. Nightingale, and P. E. Morris


In Part I the Improved Stratospheric and Mesospheric Sounder instrument and its calibration facility were described, and the results of the radiometric and spectral calibrations were presented. In Part II the remaining prelaunch calibrations are discussed.

The optical calibrations include the procedure used to coalign the different spectral channels and the mapping of the resulting instantaneous fields of view. These maps revealed detailed stray light processes within the instrument. The remaining optical calibration is of angular motion of the instrument scan mirror. The pressure modulator calibrations consist of the filling procedures and algorithm validation, which allow the gas conditions within the modulator to be determined from the instrument telemetry. Some overall conclusions to the calibration process are drawn.

Full access
J. Ballard, C. W. P. Palmer, P. E. Morris, T. J. Nightingale, J. Firth, R. J. Knight, P. Venters, R. J. Wells, and J. G. Whitney


The Improved Stratospheric and Mesospheric Sounder (ISAMS) is an infrared spectroradiometer that formed part of the science instrument payload of the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite. An essential part of the success of ISAMS in orbit was a program of prelaunch calibration and characterization of many aspects of the instrument's performance. A brief description of ISAMS is followed by a detailed discussion of the calibration and characterization methodology, the facilities used in this program, and the results from the spectral and radiometric measurements. The results are discussed in terms of factors affecting the in-flight performance of ISAMS, particularly the spectral response of the measurement channels, the radiometric linearity, stray radiations and their dependence on the line of sight view, signal-to-noise ratios, and the sensitivity of the in-flight radiometric calibration to anticipated changes to the thermal environment within ISAMS. Some of the “lessons learned” are discussed with reference to the ISAMS design and the design of future instruments and test facilities.

Full access