Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for :

  • GFDL'S Coupled Model-3 (CM3): Dynamics, Physical Parameterizations, and Simulations x
  • All content x
Clear All
Stephen M. Griffies, Michael Winton, Leo J. Donner, Larry W. Horowitz, Stephanie M. Downes, Riccardo Farneti, Anand Gnanadesikan, William J. Hurlin, Hyun-Chul Lee, Zhi Liang, Jaime B. Palter, Bonita L. Samuels, Andrew T. Wittenberg, Bruce L. Wyman, Jianjun Yin, and Niki Zadeh

portion of this paper employ historical radiative forcing from the years 1860–2000. Model comparisons use the ensemble mean and time mean from a five-member ensemble of historical experiments in CM2.1 and CM3 over the years 1981–2000. Each ensemble member was initialized from a different point during the 1860 radiatively forced spinups for the two respective models, with CM2.1 ensemble members initialized 40 years apart and CM3 ensemble members initialized 50 years apart. For our purposes, the

Full access
Jean-Christophe Golaz, Marc Salzmann, Leo J. Donner, Larry W. Horowitz, Yi Ming, and Ming Zhao

used to calculate the maximum number of nucleated drops. The equation represents the formulation of the activation source term in the cloud drop prognostic equation. Model configuration is similar to the fixed sea surface temperature (SST) simulation presented in Donner et al. (2011 ), except that interannual variability in boundary conditions and forcings are removed to enable shorter simulations. Interannual monthly SSTs are replaced with monthly climatologies for the period 1980

Full access
John Austin, Larry W. Horowitz, M. Daniel Schwarzkopf, R. John Wilson, and Hiram Levy II

, therefore causing the two fields not to be coupled in the way that they are in the atmosphere. Detailed atmospheric behavior in the vicinity of the tropopause is also poorly simulated as the ozone climatology used for model forcing tends to be described as a function of pressure, rather than relative to the tropopause. As a result, cooling rates in the vicinity of the tropopause are poorly simulated in comparison with measurements ( Forster et al. 2007 ). Second, about half of the CMIP3 models

Full access
Leo J. Donner, Bruce L. Wyman, Richard S. Hemler, Larry W. Horowitz, Yi Ming, Ming Zhao, Jean-Christophe Golaz, Paul Ginoux, S.-J. Lin, M. Daniel Schwarzkopf, John Austin, Ghassan Alaka, William F. Cooke, Thomas L. Delworth, Stuart M. Freidenreich, C. T. Gordon, Stephen M. Griffies, Isaac M. Held, William J. Hurlin, Stephen A. Klein, Thomas R. Knutson, Amy R. Langenhorst, Hyun-Chul Lee, Yanluan Lin, Brian I. Magi, Sergey L. Malyshev, P. C. D. Milly, Vaishali Naik, Mary J. Nath, Robert Pincus, Jeffrey J. Ploshay, V. Ramaswamy, Charles J. Seman, Elena Shevliakova, Joseph J. Sirutis, William F. Stern, Ronald J. Stouffer, R. John Wilson, Michael Winton, Andrew T. Wittenberg, and Fanrong Zeng

convective systems, and lateral entrainment for shallow cumulus relative to Donner (1993) and Bretherton et al. (2004) account for implementation issues in AM3 and simulation deficiencies using the referenced values. The Donner entrainment coefficients for deep cumulus updrafts were selected to yield cumulus vertical velocities in agreement with observations on a finer vertical grid for the cumulus updrafts than is used in AM3. Among other simulation characteristics, shortwave cloud forcing is

Full access