Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 12 items for :

  • Microwave observations x
  • 12th International Precipitation Conference (IPC12) x
  • All content x
Clear All
Lisa Milani, Mark S. Kulie, Daniele Casella, Pierre E. Kirstetter, Giulia Panegrossi, Veljko Petkovic, Sarah E. Ringerud, Jean-François Rysman, Paolo Sanò, Nai-Yu Wang, Yalei You, and Gail Skofronick-Jackson

detection statistics ( Skofronick-Jackson et al. 2019 ). In particular, the Goddard Profiling Algorithm (GPROF; Kummerow et al. 1996 ; Kummerow et al. 2015 ), which retrieves precipitation rates using passive microwave (PMW) observations, generally underestimates both snowfall detection and quantification when compared to active remote sensing sensor snowfall products. Previous studies based on theoretical analyses ( Skofronick-Jackson and Johnson 2011 ) and radiometer observations ( Panegrossi et al

Restricted access
Nobuyuki Utsumi, F. Joseph Turk, Ziad S. Haddad, Pierre-Emmanuel Kirstetter, and Hyungjun Kim

1. Introduction Global precipitation products capitalize upon the long period of record of satellite-based passive microwave (MW) radiometer observations ( Aonashi and Ferraro 2020 ). The passive MW brightness temperature (TB) represents the net top-of-atmosphere upwelling radiation, after taking into consideration the emission and scattering properties of hydrometeors within the top-to-bottom profile, including the contribution from the surface emissivity. The surface precipitation represents

Open access
Veljko Petković, Marko Orescanin, Pierre Kirstetter, Christian Kummerow, and Ralph Ferraro

especially pronounced in satellite observations. Since the first spaceborne passive microwave instruments were launched in early 1970s, satellite precipitation retrievals have exploited the link between upwelling radiation and state of atmospheric column. Leveraging decades of ever-improving algorithms, coverage, and data latency, the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission ( Skofronick-Jackson et al. 2018 ; Hou et al. 2014 ) represents the most advance satellite precipitation project to date

Full access
Shruti A. Upadhyaya, Pierre-Emmanuel Kirstetter, Jonathan J. Gourley, and Robert J. Kuligowski

surprisingly better detection rate (21%) than its calibrator MWCOMB (10%). Similar observations are made with the Snow type, with overall better detection with SCaMPR (23%) than MWCOMB (9%). A possible explanation is that surface emissivity affects microwave observations in the range [10–37] GHz more significantly than infrared observations. Surface emissivity variability associated with surface snow is particularly challenging for microwave observations (e.g., Takbiri et al. 2019 ; Gebregiorgis et al

Restricted access
Clément Guilloteau and Efi Foufoula-Georgiou

of orbiting imagers providing frequent observations of clouds and precipitation all over the globe ( Skofronick-Jackson et al. 2018 ). The passive microwave retrieval of precipitation relies on the measurement of radiances at the top of the atmosphere, which are the product of the surface emission, emission and absorption by liquid rain drops and water vapor and scattering by ice particles. Vertically and horizontally polarized radiances are measured at various frequencies between 5 and 200 GHz

Open access
Sarah Ringerud, Christa Peters-Lidard, Joe Munchak, and Yalei You

1. Introduction Accurate, physically based precipitation retrieval over global land surfaces is an important goal of the joint NASA/JAXA Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM) ( Hou et al. 2014 ; Skofronick-Jackson et al. 2017 ). This is a challenging problem for the passive microwave constellation component of GPM, as the hydrometeor signal over radiometrically warm land surfaces in the microwave frequencies means that the measurements used in retrievals are more indirect than over

Restricted access
Zhe Li, Daniel B. Wright, Sara Q. Zhang, Dalia B. Kirschbaum, and Samantha H. Hartke

such as the GPM “constellation” ( Skofronick-Jackson et al. 2017 ). These multisensor observations must therefore be converted into precipitation rates and interpolated onto a consistent spatial and temporal grid. The “workhorse” satellite instruments for precipitation estimates are passive microwave (PMW) radiometers, which observe along a satellite’s “swath,” the relatively narrow band over Earth sampled by the onboard sensor as a satellite moves along its orbit. Infrared (IR) observations from

Restricted access
Efi Foufoula-Georgiou, Clement Guilloteau, Phu Nguyen, Amir Aghakouchak, Kuo-Lin Hsu, Antonio Busalacchi, F. Joseph Turk, Christa Peters-Lidard, Taikan Oki, Qingyun Duan, Witold Krajewski, Remko Uijlenhoet, Ana Barros, Pierre Kirstetter, William Logan, Terri Hogue, Hoshin Gupta, and Vincenzo Levizzani

from satellites through soil moisture gravimetry (e.g., the GRACE satellite) ( Behrangi et al. 2018 ) and microwave scatterometers ( Brocca et al. 2014 ) are promising areas of research and development. In the context of the unprecedented wealth of observations with diverse information content, the use of data analytics and ML concepts to learn complex relationships from large precipitation datasets was discussed ( Sadeghi et al. 2019 ), along with the need for physically based dimensionality

Full access
Phu Nguyen, Mohammed Ombadi, Vesta Afzali Gorooh, Eric J. Shearer, Mojtaba Sadeghi, Soroosh Sorooshian, Kuolin Hsu, David Bolvin, and Martin F. Ralph

small-scale convective storm rainfall variability . J. Hydrol. , 173 , 283 – 308 , https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02703-R . 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02703-R Grecu , M. , W. S. Olson , and E. N. Anagnostou , 2004 : Retrieval of precipitation profiles from multiresolution, multifrequency active and passive microwave observations . J. Appl. Meteor. , 43 , 562 – 575 , https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0562:ROPPFM>2.0.CO;2 . 10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0562:ROPPFM>2.0.CO;2

Open access
Samantha H. Hartke, Daniel B. Wright, Dalia B. Kirschbaum, Thomas A. Stanley, and Zhe Li

of ARI and in the conditional CSGDs of ARI ( Fig. 3d ) are unsurprisingly much lower than that for daily precipitation. It has been previously shown that IMERG error depends on the amount and source of passive microwave and infrared data used ( Tan et al. 2016 ). Since this data availability varies over relatively short time scales (generally subhourly), it is not feasible to consider it when modeling multiday ARI. Since both Stage IV and IMERG observations of ARI are available over the entire

Restricted access