Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Risk assessment x
  • Catchment-scale Hydrological Modelling & Data Assimilation (CAHMDA) III x
  • All content x
Clear All
Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, Paul R. Houser, Niko E. C. Verhoest, and Valentijn R. N. Pauwels

. They illustrated how tuning the wrong error source to produce better innovation statistics led to a reduced accuracy of the filter results, when only assimilating surface soil moisture. Additionally, there was a risk to find the “globally” best innovation statistics through the optimization of the wrong error type, if different sources of error were taken into account. Reichle et al. (2008) used the same maximum-likelihood approach to identify model and observation error variances for soil

Full access