Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Societal impacts x
  • All content x
Clear All
Alan J. Hewitt, Ben B. B. Booth, Chris D. Jones, Eddy S. Robertson, Andy J. Wiltshire, Philip G. Sansom, David B. Stephenson, and Stan Yip

understand the causes of this uncertainty in compatible emissions. The scenarios are designed to be different—they were selected from hundreds of possible scenarios and approximately span the 10th to 90th percentiles of future radiative forcing across published scenarios. They represent very different societal choices around climate targets and how to achieve them. Hence, it is desirable that the consequences of these choices can be distinguished in terms of their impacts on global and regional climate

Full access
Spencer Liddicoat, Chris Jones, and Eddy Robertson

outcomes of impacts and vulnerability studies carried out with the climate data generated by the ES-GCMs are realistic consequences of the range of societal, technological, and population change scenarios upon which the IAM emissions and concentration scenarios are based. b. Use of online LUC emissions in determining E FF Section 3d demonstrates that the LUC emissions determined by the offline method (128 GtC from 1860 to 2005) are much closer to the observation-based estimate of Houghton (2008

Full access