Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for :

  • Author or Editor: D. G. Fox x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
D. G. Ross
and
D. G. Fox

Abstract

This paper describes results from a study to evaluate components of an operational air quality modeling system for complex terrain. In particular, the Cinder Cone Butte (CCB) “modeler's dataset” is used to evaluate the current technique for incorporating terrain influences and atmospheric stability into the system's 3D diagnostic wind-field model.

The wind-field model is used in conjunction with a Gaussian puff model to compare predicted and observed tracer concentrations for different configurations, chosen to highlight the influence of the model's technique for incorporating terrain and atmospheric stability in the final flow field. A quantitative statistical basis, including the use of a bootstrap resampling procedure to estimate confidence limits for the performance measures, is used for the evaluation. The results show that the model's technique for incorporating terrain and atmospheric stability yields a significant improvement in predictive performance. Even when only routinely available input data are used, the performance is shown to be as good as that of models based directly on the CCB dataset itself.

Full access
D. G. Ross
,
I. N. Smith
,
P. C. Manins
, and
D. G. Fox

Abstract

A three dimensional diagnostic wind field model is shown to be capable of generating potential flow solutions associated with simple terrain features. This is achieved by modifying an initially uniform background wind to make the flow divergence free. Atmospheric stability effects can be incorporated by considering the relative degree of adjustment that is allowed between the horizontal and vertical components of the wind.

A framework for developing a Froude-number-dependent expression for this ratio is proposed and evaluated by comparing modeled streamline deflections of flow past an ideal hill with results from wind tunnel and tow tank experiments.

Full access
D. N. Williams
,
R. Ananthakrishnan
,
D. E. Bernholdt
,
S. Bharathi
,
D. Brown
,
M. Chen
,
A. L. Chervenak
,
L. Cinquini
,
R. Drach
,
I. T. Foster
,
P. Fox
,
D. Fraser
,
J. Garcia
,
S. Hankin
,
P. Jones
,
D. E. Middleton
,
J. Schwidder
,
R. Schweitzer
,
R. Schuler
,
A. Shoshani
,
F. Siebenlist
,
A. Sim
,
W. G. Strand
,
M. Su
, and
N. Wilhelmi

By leveraging current technologies to manage distributed climate data in a unified virtual environment, the Earth System Grid (ESG) project is promoting data sharing between international research centers and diverse users. In transforming these data into a collaborative community resource, ESG is changing the way global climate research is conducted.

Since ESG's production beginnings in 2004, its most notable accomplishment was to efficiently store and distribute climate simulation data of some 20 global coupled ocean-atmosphere models to the scores of scientific contributors to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); the IPCC collective scientific achievement was recognized by the award of a 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. Other international climate stakeholders such as the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) and the developers of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) and of the Climate Science Computational End Station (CCES) also have endorsed ESG technologies for disseminating data to their respective user communities. In coming years, the recently created Earth System Grid Center for Enabling Technology (ESG-CET) will extend these methods to assist the international climate community in its efforts to better understand the global climate system.

Full access
Shuguang Liu
,
Ben Bond-Lamberty
,
Lena R. Boysen
,
James D. Ford
,
Andrew Fox
,
Kevin Gallo
,
Jerry Hatfield
,
Geoffrey M. Henebry
,
Thomas G. Huntington
,
Zhihua Liu
,
Thomas R. Loveland
,
Richard J. Norby
,
Terry Sohl
,
Allison L. Steiner
,
Wenping Yuan
,
Zhao Zhang
, and
Shuqing Zhao

Abstract

Half of Earth’s land surface has been altered by human activities, creating various consequences on the climate and weather systems at local to global scales, which in turn affect a myriad of land surface processes and the adaptation behaviors. This study reviews the status and major knowledge gaps in the interactions of land and atmospheric changes and present 11 grand challenge areas for the scientific research and adaptation community in the coming decade. These land-cover and land-use change (LCLUC)-related areas include 1) impacts on weather and climate, 2) carbon and other biogeochemical cycles, 3) biospheric emissions, 4) the water cycle, 5) agriculture, 6) urbanization, 7) acclimation of biogeochemical processes to climate change, 8) plant migration, 9) land-use projections, 10) model and data uncertainties, and, finally, 11) adaptation strategies. Numerous studies have demonstrated the effects of LCLUC on local to global climate and weather systems, but these putative effects vary greatly in magnitude and even sign across space, time, and scale and thus remain highly uncertain. At the same time, many challenges exist toward improved understanding of the consequences of atmospheric and climate change on land process dynamics and services. Future effort must improve the understanding of the scale-dependent, multifaceted perturbations and feedbacks between land and climate changes in both reality and models. To this end, one critical cross-disciplinary need is to systematically quantify and better understand measurement and model uncertainties. Finally, LCLUC mitigation and adaptation assessments must be strengthened to identify implementation barriers, evaluate and prioritize opportunities, and examine how decision-making processes work in specific contexts.

Full access
Bruce A. Wielicki
,
D. F. Young
,
M. G. Mlynczak
,
K. J. Thome
,
S. Leroy
,
J. Corliss
,
J. G. Anderson
,
C. O. Ao
,
R. Bantges
,
F. Best
,
K. Bowman
,
H. Brindley
,
J. J. Butler
,
W. Collins
,
J. A. Dykema
,
D. R. Doelling
,
D. R. Feldman
,
N. Fox
,
X. Huang
,
R. Holz
,
Y. Huang
,
Z. Jin
,
D. Jennings
,
D. G. Johnson
,
K. Jucks
,
S. Kato
,
D. B. Kirk-Davidoff
,
R. Knuteson
,
G. Kopp
,
D. P. Kratz
,
X. Liu
,
C. Lukashin
,
A. J. Mannucci
,
N. Phojanamongkolkij
,
P. Pilewskie
,
V. Ramaswamy
,
H. Revercomb
,
J. Rice
,
Y. Roberts
,
C. M. Roithmayr
,
F. Rose
,
S. Sandford
,
E. L. Shirley
,
Sr. W. L. Smith
,
B. Soden
,
P. W. Speth
,
W. Sun
,
P. C. Taylor
,
D. Tobin
, and
X. Xiong

The Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) mission will provide a calibration laboratory in orbit for the purpose of accurately measuring and attributing climate change. CLARREO measurements establish new climate change benchmarks with high absolute radiometric accuracy and high statistical confidence across a wide range of essential climate variables. CLARREO's inherently high absolute accuracy will be verified and traceable on orbit to Système Internationale (SI) units. The benchmarks established by CLARREO will be critical for assessing changes in the Earth system and climate model predictive capabilities for decades into the future as society works to meet the challenge of optimizing strategies for mitigating and adapting to climate change. The CLARREO benchmarks are derived from measurements of the Earth's thermal infrared spectrum (5–50 μm), the spectrum of solar radiation reflected by the Earth and its atmosphere (320–2300 nm), and radio occultation refractivity from which accurate temperature profiles are derived. The mission has the ability to provide new spectral fingerprints of climate change, as well as to provide the first orbiting radiometer with accuracy sufficient to serve as the reference transfer standard for other space sensors, in essence serving as a “NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] in orbit.” CLARREO will greatly improve the accuracy and relevance of a wide range of space-borne instruments for decadal climate change. Finally, CLARREO has developed new metrics and methods for determining the accuracy requirements of climate observations for a wide range of climate variables and uncertainty sources. These methods should be useful for improving our understanding of observing requirements for most climate change observations.

Full access
A. Boone
,
F. Habets
,
J. Noilhan
,
D. Clark
,
P. Dirmeyer
,
S. Fox
,
Y. Gusev
,
I. Haddeland
,
R. Koster
,
D. Lohmann
,
S. Mahanama
,
K. Mitchell
,
O. Nasonova
,
G.-Y. Niu
,
A. Pitman
,
J. Polcher
,
A. B. Shmakin
,
K. Tanaka
,
B. van den Hurk
,
S. Vérant
,
D. Verseghy
,
P. Viterbo
, and
Z.-L. Yang

Abstract

The Rhône-Aggregation (Rhône-AGG) Land Surface Scheme (LSS) intercomparison project is an initiative within the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX)/Global Land–Atmosphere System Study (GLASS) panel of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). It is a intermediate step leading up to the next phase of the Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP) (Phase 2), for which there will be a broader investigation of the aggregation between global scales (GSWP-1) and the river scale. This project makes use of the Rhône modeling system, which was developed in recent years by the French research community in order to study the continental water cycle on a regional scale.

The main goals of this study are to investigate how 15 LSSs simulate the water balance for several annual cycles compared to data from a dense observation network consisting of daily discharge from over 145 gauges and daily snow depth from 24 sites, and to examine the impact of changing the spatial scale on the simulations. The overall evapotranspiration, runoff, and monthly change in water storage are similarly simulated by the LSSs, however, the differing partitioning among the fluxes results in very different river discharges and soil moisture equilibrium states. Subgrid runoff is especially important for discharge at the daily timescale and for smaller-scale basins. Also, models using an explicit treatment of the snowpack compared better with the observations than simpler composite schemes.

Results from a series of scaling experiments are examined for which the spatial resolution of the computational grid is decreased to be consistent with large-scale atmospheric models. The impact of upscaling on the domain-averaged hydrological components is similar among most LSSs, with increased evaporation of water intercepted by the canopy and a decrease in surface runoff representing the most consistent inter-LSS responses. A significant finding is that the snow water equivalent is greatly reduced by upscaling in all LSSs but one that explicitly accounts for subgrid-scale orography effects on the atmospheric forcing.

Full access
R. H. Moss
,
S. Avery
,
K. Baja
,
M. Burkett
,
A. M. Chischilly
,
J. Dell
,
P. A. Fleming
,
K. Geil
,
K. Jacobs
,
A. Jones
,
K. Knowlton
,
J. Koh
,
M. C. Lemos
,
J. Melillo
,
R. Pandya
,
T. C. Richmond
,
L. Scarlett
,
J. Snyder
,
M. Stults
,
A. M. Waple
,
J. Whitehead
,
D. Zarrilli
,
B. M. Ayyub
,
J. Fox
,
A. Ganguly
,
L. Joppa
,
S. Julius
,
P. Kirshen
,
R. Kreutter
,
A. McGovern
,
R. Meyer
,
J. Neumann
,
W. Solecki
,
J. Smith
,
P. Tissot
,
G. Yohe
, and
R. Zimmerman

Abstract

As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal “climate assessment consortium” to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit–cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.

Open access