Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author or Editor: Brian Blanton x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
Robert Erhardt
,
Jesse Bell
,
Brian Blanton
,
Frank Nutter
,
Megan Robinson
, and
Richard Smith
Full access
Russell S. Vose
,
Scott Applequist
,
Mark A. Bourassa
,
Sara C. Pryor
,
Rebecca J. Barthelmie
,
Brian Blanton
,
Peter D. Bromirski
,
Harold E. Brooks
,
Arthur T. DeGaetano
,
Randall M. Dole
,
David R. Easterling
,
Robert E. Jensen
,
Thomas R. Karl
,
Richard W. Katz
,
Katherine Klink
,
Michael C. Kruk
,
Kenneth E. Kunkel
,
Michael C. MacCracken
,
Thomas C. Peterson
,
Karsten Shein
,
Bridget R. Thomas
,
John E. Walsh
,
Xiaolan L. Wang
,
Michael F. Wehner
,
Donald J. Wuebbles
, and
Robert S. Young

This scientific assessment examines changes in three climate extremes—extratropical storms, winds, and waves—with an emphasis on U.S. coastal regions during the cold season. There is moderate evidence of an increase in both extratropical storm frequency and intensity during the cold season in the Northern Hemisphere since 1950, with suggestive evidence of geographic shifts resulting in slight upward trends in offshore/coastal regions. There is also suggestive evidence of an increase in extreme winds (at least annually) over parts of the ocean since the early to mid-1980s, but the evidence over the U.S. land surface is inconclusive. Finally, there is moderate evidence of an increase in extreme waves in winter along the Pacific coast since the 1950s, but along other U.S. shorelines any tendencies are of modest magnitude compared with historical variability. The data for extratropical cyclones are considered to be of relatively high quality for trend detection, whereas the data for extreme winds and waves are judged to be of intermediate quality. In terms of physical causes leading to multidecadal changes, the level of understanding for both extratropical storms and extreme winds is considered to be relatively low, while that for extreme waves is judged to be intermediate. Since the ability to measure these changes with some confidence is relatively recent, understanding is expected to improve in the future for a variety of reasons, including increased periods of record and the development of “climate reanalysis” projects.

Full access
Suzanne Van Cooten
,
Kevin E. Kelleher
,
Kenneth Howard
,
Jian Zhang
,
Jonathan J. Gourley
,
John S. Kain
,
Kodi Nemunaitis-Monroe
,
Zac Flamig
,
Heather Moser
,
Ami Arthur
,
Carrie Langston
,
Randall Kolar
,
Yang Hong
,
Kendra Dresback
,
Evan Tromble
,
Humberto Vergara
,
Richard A Luettich Jr.
,
Brian Blanton
,
Howard Lander
,
Ken Galluppi
,
Jessica Proud Losego
,
Cheryl Ann Blain
,
Jack Thigpen
,
Katie Mosher
,
Darin Figurskey
,
Michael Moneypenny
,
Jonathan Blaes
,
Jeff Orrock
,
Rich Bandy
,
Carin Goodall
,
John G. W. Kelley
,
Jason Greenlaw
,
Micah Wengren
,
Dave Eslinger
,
Jeff Payne
,
Geno Olmi
,
John Feldt
,
John Schmidt
,
Todd Hamill
,
Robert Bacon
,
Robert Stickney
, and
Lundie Spence

The objective of the Coastal and Inland Flooding Observation and Warning (CI-FLOW) project is to prototype new hydrometeorologic techniques to address a critical NOAA service gap: routine total water level predictions for tidally influenced watersheds. Since February 2000, the project has focused on developing a coupled modeling system to accurately account for water at all locations in a coastal watershed by exchanging data between atmospheric, hydrologic, and hydrodynamic models. These simulations account for the quantity of water associated with waves, tides, storm surge, rivers, and rainfall, including interactions at the tidal/surge interface.

Within this project, CI-FLOW addresses the following goals: i) apply advanced weather and oceanographic monitoring and prediction techniques to the coastal environment; ii) prototype an automated hydrometeorologic data collection and prediction system; iii) facilitate interdisciplinary and multiorganizational collaborations; and iv) enhance techniques and technologies that improve actionable hydrologic/hydrodynamic information to reduce the impacts of coastal flooding. Results are presented for Hurricane Isabel (2003), Hurricane Earl (2010), and Tropical Storm Nicole (2010) for the Tar–Pamlico and Neuse River basins of North Carolina. This area was chosen, in part, because of the tremendous damage inflicted by Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd (1999). The vision is to transition CI-FLOW research findings and technologies to other U.S. coastal watersheds.

Full access