Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for
- Author or Editor: Hsin-I Chang x
- Refine by Access: All Content x
Abstract
The Southern Great Plains experience fluctuating precipitation extremes that significantly impact agriculture and water management. Despite ongoing efforts to enhance forecast accuracy, the underlying causes of these climatic phenomena remain inadequately understood. This study elucidates the relative influence of the tropical Pacific and Atlantic basins on April-May-June precipitation variability in this region. Our partial ocean assimilation experiments using the Community Earth System Model unveil the prominent role of inter-basin interaction, with the Pacific and Atlantic contributing approximately 70% and 30%, respectively, to these inter-basin contrasts. Our statistical analyses suggest that these tropical inter-basin contrasts could serve as a more reliable indicator for late-spring precipitation anomalies than the El Niño Southern Oscillation. The conclusions are reinforced by analyses of seven climate forecasting systems within the North American Multi-Model Ensemble, offering an optimistic outlook for enhancing real-time forecasting of late-spring precipitation in the Southern Plains. However, the current predictive skills of the inter-basin contrasts across the prediction systems are hindered by the lower predictability of the tropical Atlantic Ocean, pointing to the need for future research to refine climate prediction models further.
Abstract
The Southern Great Plains experience fluctuating precipitation extremes that significantly impact agriculture and water management. Despite ongoing efforts to enhance forecast accuracy, the underlying causes of these climatic phenomena remain inadequately understood. This study elucidates the relative influence of the tropical Pacific and Atlantic basins on April-May-June precipitation variability in this region. Our partial ocean assimilation experiments using the Community Earth System Model unveil the prominent role of inter-basin interaction, with the Pacific and Atlantic contributing approximately 70% and 30%, respectively, to these inter-basin contrasts. Our statistical analyses suggest that these tropical inter-basin contrasts could serve as a more reliable indicator for late-spring precipitation anomalies than the El Niño Southern Oscillation. The conclusions are reinforced by analyses of seven climate forecasting systems within the North American Multi-Model Ensemble, offering an optimistic outlook for enhancing real-time forecasting of late-spring precipitation in the Southern Plains. However, the current predictive skills of the inter-basin contrasts across the prediction systems are hindered by the lower predictability of the tropical Atlantic Ocean, pointing to the need for future research to refine climate prediction models further.
Abstract
Surface meteorological analyses serve a wide range of research and applications, including forcing inputs for hydrological and ecological models, climate analysis, and resource and emergency management. Quantifying uncertainty in such analyses would extend their utility for probabilistic hydrologic prediction and climate risk applications. With this motivation, we enhance and evaluate an approach for generating ensemble analyses of precipitation and temperature through the fusion of station observations, terrain information, and numerical weather prediction simulations of surface climate fields. In particular, we expand a spatial regression in which static terrain attributes serve as predictors for spatially distributed 1/16° daily surface precipitation and temperature by including forecast outputs from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) numerical weather prediction model as additional predictors. We demonstrate the approach for a case study domain of California, focusing on the meteorological conditions leading to the 2017 flood and spillway failure event at Lake Oroville. The approach extends the spatial regression capability of the Gridded Meteorological Ensemble Tool (GMET) and also adds cross validation to the uncertainty estimation component, enabling the use of predictive rather than calibration uncertainty. In evaluation against out-of-sample station observations, the HRRR-based predictors alone are found to be skillful for the study setting, leading to overall improvements in the enhanced GMET meteorological analyses. The methodology and associated tool represent a promising method for generating meteorological surface analyses for both research-oriented and operational applications, as well as a general strategy for merging in situ and gridded observations.
Abstract
Surface meteorological analyses serve a wide range of research and applications, including forcing inputs for hydrological and ecological models, climate analysis, and resource and emergency management. Quantifying uncertainty in such analyses would extend their utility for probabilistic hydrologic prediction and climate risk applications. With this motivation, we enhance and evaluate an approach for generating ensemble analyses of precipitation and temperature through the fusion of station observations, terrain information, and numerical weather prediction simulations of surface climate fields. In particular, we expand a spatial regression in which static terrain attributes serve as predictors for spatially distributed 1/16° daily surface precipitation and temperature by including forecast outputs from the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) numerical weather prediction model as additional predictors. We demonstrate the approach for a case study domain of California, focusing on the meteorological conditions leading to the 2017 flood and spillway failure event at Lake Oroville. The approach extends the spatial regression capability of the Gridded Meteorological Ensemble Tool (GMET) and also adds cross validation to the uncertainty estimation component, enabling the use of predictive rather than calibration uncertainty. In evaluation against out-of-sample station observations, the HRRR-based predictors alone are found to be skillful for the study setting, leading to overall improvements in the enhanced GMET meteorological analyses. The methodology and associated tool represent a promising method for generating meteorological surface analyses for both research-oriented and operational applications, as well as a general strategy for merging in situ and gridded observations.
Abstract
A 16-member convective-scale ensemble prediction system (CEPS) developed at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) of Taiwan is evaluated for probability forecasts of convective precipitation. To address the issues of limited predictability of convective systems, the CEPS provides short-range forecasts using initial conditions from a rapid-updated ensemble data assimilation system. This study aims to identify the behavior of the CEPS forecasts, especially the impact of different ensemble configurations and forecast lead times. Warm-season afternoon thunderstorms (ATs) from 30 June to 4 July 2017 are selected. Since ATs usually occur between 1300 and 2000 LST, this study compares deterministic and probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) launched at 0500, 0800, and 1100 LST. This study demonstrates that initial and boundary perturbations (IBP) are crucial to ensure good spread–skill consistency over the 18-h forecasts. On top of IBP, additional model perturbations have insignificant impacts on upper-air and precipitation forecasts. The deterministic QPFs launched at 1100 LST outperform those launched at 0500 and 0800 LST, likely because the most-recent data assimilation analyses enhance the practical predictability. However, it cannot improve the probabilistic QPFs launched at 1100 LST due to inadequate ensemble spreads resulting from limited error growth time. This study points out the importance of sufficient initial condition uncertainty on short-range probabilistic forecasts to exploit the benefits of rapid-update data assimilation analyses.
Significance Statement
This study aims to understand the behavior of convective-scale short-range probabilistic forecasts in Taiwan and the surrounding area. Taiwan is influenced by diverse weather systems, including typhoons, mei-yu fronts, and local thunderstorms. During the past decade, there has been promising improvement in predicting mesoscale weather systems (e.g., typhoons and mei-yu fronts). However, it is still challenging to provide timely and accurate forecasts for rapid-evolving high-impact convection. This study provides a reference for the designation of convective-scale ensemble prediction systems; in particular, those with a goal to provide short-range probabilistic forecasts. While the findings cannot be extrapolated to all ensemble prediction systems, this study demonstrates that initial and boundary perturbations are the most important factors, while the model perturbation has an insignificant effect. This study suggests that in-depth studies are required to improve the convective-scale initial condition accuracy and uncertainty to provide reliable probabilistic forecasts within short lead times.
Abstract
A 16-member convective-scale ensemble prediction system (CEPS) developed at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) of Taiwan is evaluated for probability forecasts of convective precipitation. To address the issues of limited predictability of convective systems, the CEPS provides short-range forecasts using initial conditions from a rapid-updated ensemble data assimilation system. This study aims to identify the behavior of the CEPS forecasts, especially the impact of different ensemble configurations and forecast lead times. Warm-season afternoon thunderstorms (ATs) from 30 June to 4 July 2017 are selected. Since ATs usually occur between 1300 and 2000 LST, this study compares deterministic and probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) launched at 0500, 0800, and 1100 LST. This study demonstrates that initial and boundary perturbations (IBP) are crucial to ensure good spread–skill consistency over the 18-h forecasts. On top of IBP, additional model perturbations have insignificant impacts on upper-air and precipitation forecasts. The deterministic QPFs launched at 1100 LST outperform those launched at 0500 and 0800 LST, likely because the most-recent data assimilation analyses enhance the practical predictability. However, it cannot improve the probabilistic QPFs launched at 1100 LST due to inadequate ensemble spreads resulting from limited error growth time. This study points out the importance of sufficient initial condition uncertainty on short-range probabilistic forecasts to exploit the benefits of rapid-update data assimilation analyses.
Significance Statement
This study aims to understand the behavior of convective-scale short-range probabilistic forecasts in Taiwan and the surrounding area. Taiwan is influenced by diverse weather systems, including typhoons, mei-yu fronts, and local thunderstorms. During the past decade, there has been promising improvement in predicting mesoscale weather systems (e.g., typhoons and mei-yu fronts). However, it is still challenging to provide timely and accurate forecasts for rapid-evolving high-impact convection. This study provides a reference for the designation of convective-scale ensemble prediction systems; in particular, those with a goal to provide short-range probabilistic forecasts. While the findings cannot be extrapolated to all ensemble prediction systems, this study demonstrates that initial and boundary perturbations are the most important factors, while the model perturbation has an insignificant effect. This study suggests that in-depth studies are required to improve the convective-scale initial condition accuracy and uncertainty to provide reliable probabilistic forecasts within short lead times.
Abstract
Global climate models are challenged to represent the North American monsoon, in terms of its climatology and interannual variability. To investigate whether a regional atmospheric model can improve warm season forecasts in North America, a retrospective Climate Forecast System (CFS) model reforecast (1982–2000) and the corresponding NCEP–NCAR reanalysis are dynamically downscaled with the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF), with similar parameterization options as used for high-resolution numerical weather prediction and a new spectral nudging capability. The regional model improves the climatological representation of monsoon precipitation because of its more realistic representation of the diurnal cycle of convection. However, it is challenged to capture organized, propagating convection at a distance from terrain, regardless of the boundary forcing data used. Dynamical downscaling of CFS generally yields modest improvement in surface temperature and precipitation anomaly correlations in those regions where it is already positive in the global model. For the North American monsoon region, WRF adds value to the seasonally forecast temperature only in early summer and does not add value to the seasonally forecast precipitation. CFS has a greater ability to represent the large-scale atmospheric circulation in early summer because of the influence of Pacific SST forcing. The temperature and precipitation anomaly correlations in both the global and regional model are thus relatively higher in early summer than late summer. As the dominant modes of early warm season precipitation are better represented in the regional model, given reasonable large-scale atmospheric forcing, dynamical downscaling will add value to warm season seasonal forecasts. CFS performance appears to be inconsistent in this regard.
Abstract
Global climate models are challenged to represent the North American monsoon, in terms of its climatology and interannual variability. To investigate whether a regional atmospheric model can improve warm season forecasts in North America, a retrospective Climate Forecast System (CFS) model reforecast (1982–2000) and the corresponding NCEP–NCAR reanalysis are dynamically downscaled with the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF), with similar parameterization options as used for high-resolution numerical weather prediction and a new spectral nudging capability. The regional model improves the climatological representation of monsoon precipitation because of its more realistic representation of the diurnal cycle of convection. However, it is challenged to capture organized, propagating convection at a distance from terrain, regardless of the boundary forcing data used. Dynamical downscaling of CFS generally yields modest improvement in surface temperature and precipitation anomaly correlations in those regions where it is already positive in the global model. For the North American monsoon region, WRF adds value to the seasonally forecast temperature only in early summer and does not add value to the seasonally forecast precipitation. CFS has a greater ability to represent the large-scale atmospheric circulation in early summer because of the influence of Pacific SST forcing. The temperature and precipitation anomaly correlations in both the global and regional model are thus relatively higher in early summer than late summer. As the dominant modes of early warm season precipitation are better represented in the regional model, given reasonable large-scale atmospheric forcing, dynamical downscaling will add value to warm season seasonal forecasts. CFS performance appears to be inconsistent in this regard.
Abstract
Long-term changes in North American monsoon (NAM) precipitation intensity in the southwestern United States are evaluated through the use of convective-permitting model simulations of objectively identified severe weather events during “historical past” (1950–70) and “present day” (1991–2010) periods. Severe weather events are the days on which the highest atmospheric instability and moisture occur within a long-term regional climate simulation. Simulations of severe weather event days are performed with convective-permitting (2.5 km) grid spacing, and these simulations are compared with available observed precipitation data to evaluate the model performance and to verify any statistically significant model-simulated trends in precipitation. Statistical evaluation of precipitation extremes is performed using a peaks-over-threshold approach with a generalized Pareto distribution. A statistically significant long-term increase in atmospheric moisture and instability is associated with an increase in extreme monsoon precipitation in observations and simulations of severe weather events, corresponding to similar behavior in station-based precipitation observations in the Southwest. Precipitation is becoming more intense within the context of the diurnal cycle of convection. The largest modeled increases in extreme-event precipitation occur in central and southwestern Arizona, where mesoscale convective systems account for a majority of monsoon precipitation and where relatively large modeled increases in precipitable water occur. Therefore, it is concluded that a more favorable thermodynamic environment in the southwestern United States is facilitating stronger organized monsoon convection during at least the last 20 years.
Abstract
Long-term changes in North American monsoon (NAM) precipitation intensity in the southwestern United States are evaluated through the use of convective-permitting model simulations of objectively identified severe weather events during “historical past” (1950–70) and “present day” (1991–2010) periods. Severe weather events are the days on which the highest atmospheric instability and moisture occur within a long-term regional climate simulation. Simulations of severe weather event days are performed with convective-permitting (2.5 km) grid spacing, and these simulations are compared with available observed precipitation data to evaluate the model performance and to verify any statistically significant model-simulated trends in precipitation. Statistical evaluation of precipitation extremes is performed using a peaks-over-threshold approach with a generalized Pareto distribution. A statistically significant long-term increase in atmospheric moisture and instability is associated with an increase in extreme monsoon precipitation in observations and simulations of severe weather events, corresponding to similar behavior in station-based precipitation observations in the Southwest. Precipitation is becoming more intense within the context of the diurnal cycle of convection. The largest modeled increases in extreme-event precipitation occur in central and southwestern Arizona, where mesoscale convective systems account for a majority of monsoon precipitation and where relatively large modeled increases in precipitable water occur. Therefore, it is concluded that a more favorable thermodynamic environment in the southwestern United States is facilitating stronger organized monsoon convection during at least the last 20 years.
Abstract
Almost one-half of the annual precipitation in the southwestern United States occurs during the North American monsoon (NAM). Given favorable synoptic-scale conditions, organized monsoon thunderstorms may affect relatively large geographic areas. Through an objective analysis of atmospheric reanalysis and observational data, the dominant synoptic patterns associated with NAM extreme events are determined for the period from 1993 to 2010. Thermodynamically favorable extreme-weather-event days are selected on the basis of atmospheric instability and precipitable water vapor from Tucson, Arizona, rawinsonde data. The atmospheric circulation patterns at 500 hPa associated with the extreme events are objectively characterized using principal component analysis. The first two dominant modes of 500-hPa geopotential-height anomalies of the severe-weather-event days correspond to type-I and type-II severe-weather-event patterns previously subjectively identified by Maddox et al. These patterns reflect a positioning of the monsoon ridge to the north and east or north and west, respectively, from its position in the “Four Corners” region during the period of the climatological maximum of monsoon precipitation from mid-July to mid-August. An hourly radar–gauge precipitation product shows evidence of organized, westward-propagating convection in Arizona during the type-I and type-II severe weather events. This new methodological approach for objectively identifying severe weather events may be easily adapted to inform operational forecasting or analysis of gridded climate data.
Abstract
Almost one-half of the annual precipitation in the southwestern United States occurs during the North American monsoon (NAM). Given favorable synoptic-scale conditions, organized monsoon thunderstorms may affect relatively large geographic areas. Through an objective analysis of atmospheric reanalysis and observational data, the dominant synoptic patterns associated with NAM extreme events are determined for the period from 1993 to 2010. Thermodynamically favorable extreme-weather-event days are selected on the basis of atmospheric instability and precipitable water vapor from Tucson, Arizona, rawinsonde data. The atmospheric circulation patterns at 500 hPa associated with the extreme events are objectively characterized using principal component analysis. The first two dominant modes of 500-hPa geopotential-height anomalies of the severe-weather-event days correspond to type-I and type-II severe-weather-event patterns previously subjectively identified by Maddox et al. These patterns reflect a positioning of the monsoon ridge to the north and east or north and west, respectively, from its position in the “Four Corners” region during the period of the climatological maximum of monsoon precipitation from mid-July to mid-August. An hourly radar–gauge precipitation product shows evidence of organized, westward-propagating convection in Arizona during the type-I and type-II severe weather events. This new methodological approach for objectively identifying severe weather events may be easily adapted to inform operational forecasting or analysis of gridded climate data.
