Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author or Editor: Larisa D. Trichtchenko x
- Refine by Access: All Content x
Abstract
A highly elliptical orbit (HEO) with a 16-h period is proposed for continuous meteorological imaging of polar regions from a two-satellite constellation. This orbit is characterized by three apogees (TAP) separated by 120°. The two satellites are 8 h apart, with repeatable ground track in the course of 2 days. Advantages are highlighted in comparison to the Molniya 12-h orbit described in detail in a previous study (Trishchenko and Garand). Orbital parameters (period, eccentricity, and inclination) are obtained as a result of an optimization process. The principles of orbit optimization are based on the following four key requirements: spatial resolution (apogee height), the altitude of crossing the trapped proton region at the equator (minimization of radiation doze caused by trapped protons), imaging time over the polar regions, and the stability of the orbit, which is mostly defined by the rotation of perigee. The interplay between these requirements points to a 16-h period with an eccentricity of 0.55 as the optimum solution. The practical range of orbit inclinations that could be maintained during the spacecraft lifetime can vary from a critical value of 63.435° to 70° (subject to the amount of propellant available for orbital maneuvers). In comparison to Molniya, this type of orbit reduces the radiation exposure to high-energy protons by factor of 103–104. On the other hand, the main advantage of 16 h versus longer orbital periods up to 24 h is better spatial resolution as a result of a lower apogee height. A two-satellite TAP constellation with an orbital inclination of 66° provides 100% temporal coverage above 60°N, >95% above 55°N, >85% above 50°N, and >75% above 45°N.
Abstract
A highly elliptical orbit (HEO) with a 16-h period is proposed for continuous meteorological imaging of polar regions from a two-satellite constellation. This orbit is characterized by three apogees (TAP) separated by 120°. The two satellites are 8 h apart, with repeatable ground track in the course of 2 days. Advantages are highlighted in comparison to the Molniya 12-h orbit described in detail in a previous study (Trishchenko and Garand). Orbital parameters (period, eccentricity, and inclination) are obtained as a result of an optimization process. The principles of orbit optimization are based on the following four key requirements: spatial resolution (apogee height), the altitude of crossing the trapped proton region at the equator (minimization of radiation doze caused by trapped protons), imaging time over the polar regions, and the stability of the orbit, which is mostly defined by the rotation of perigee. The interplay between these requirements points to a 16-h period with an eccentricity of 0.55 as the optimum solution. The practical range of orbit inclinations that could be maintained during the spacecraft lifetime can vary from a critical value of 63.435° to 70° (subject to the amount of propellant available for orbital maneuvers). In comparison to Molniya, this type of orbit reduces the radiation exposure to high-energy protons by factor of 103–104. On the other hand, the main advantage of 16 h versus longer orbital periods up to 24 h is better spatial resolution as a result of a lower apogee height. A two-satellite TAP constellation with an orbital inclination of 66° provides 100% temporal coverage above 60°N, >95% above 55°N, >85% above 50°N, and >75% above 45°N.
Observing Polar Regions from Space: Comparison between Highly Elliptical Orbit and Medium Earth Orbit ConstellationsAbstract
Continuous observation of polar regions from space remains an important unsolved technical challenge of great interest for the international meteorological community. This capacity would allow achieving global continuous coverage once combined with the geostationary (GEO) satellite network. From a practical point of view, continuous coverage of polar regions with a small number of spacecraft can be obtained from a constellation of satellites either in highly elliptical orbits (HEO) or in medium Earth orbits (MEO). The study compares HEO and MEO satellite constellations for their capacity to provide continuous imaging of polar regions as function of the viewing zenith angle (VZA) and evaluates the corresponding latitude limits that ensure sufficient overlap with GEO imagery. Earlier studies assumed the latitude boundary of 60° and the VZA range 70°–85° depending on the space mission focus: meteorological purposes or communications. From the detailed analysis of meteorological retrieval requirements, this study suggests that the overlap of the GEO and polar observing systems (HEO or MEO) should occur down to the latitude band 45°–50° with a maximum VZA ranging between 60° and 64°. This coverage requirement can be met with two sets of three-satellite HEO constellations (one for each polar area) or a six-satellite MEO constellation. The 12-h Molniya and 14-, 15-, and 16-h HEO systems have been analyzed and determined to meet these revised requirements. The study demonstrates that the six-satellite 24-h MEO system can provide a suitable solution, which is also beneficial from the point of view of ionizing radiation and image acquisition geometry. Among the HEO systems, the 16-h HEO has some advantages relative to other HEO systems from the point of view of spatial coverage and space radiation.
Abstract
Continuous observation of polar regions from space remains an important unsolved technical challenge of great interest for the international meteorological community. This capacity would allow achieving global continuous coverage once combined with the geostationary (GEO) satellite network. From a practical point of view, continuous coverage of polar regions with a small number of spacecraft can be obtained from a constellation of satellites either in highly elliptical orbits (HEO) or in medium Earth orbits (MEO). The study compares HEO and MEO satellite constellations for their capacity to provide continuous imaging of polar regions as function of the viewing zenith angle (VZA) and evaluates the corresponding latitude limits that ensure sufficient overlap with GEO imagery. Earlier studies assumed the latitude boundary of 60° and the VZA range 70°–85° depending on the space mission focus: meteorological purposes or communications. From the detailed analysis of meteorological retrieval requirements, this study suggests that the overlap of the GEO and polar observing systems (HEO or MEO) should occur down to the latitude band 45°–50° with a maximum VZA ranging between 60° and 64°. This coverage requirement can be met with two sets of three-satellite HEO constellations (one for each polar area) or a six-satellite MEO constellation. The 12-h Molniya and 14-, 15-, and 16-h HEO systems have been analyzed and determined to meet these revised requirements. The study demonstrates that the six-satellite 24-h MEO system can provide a suitable solution, which is also beneficial from the point of view of ionizing radiation and image acquisition geometry. Among the HEO systems, the 16-h HEO has some advantages relative to other HEO systems from the point of view of spatial coverage and space radiation.
Abstract
A novel type of multiple-apogee highly elliptical orbits termed as MAP HEO with a period of rotation between 14 h and 15 h is introduced. These orbits are designed to achieve continuous geostationary (GEO)-like imaging of the polar regions in an optimum way. The combination of GEO and HEO satellites would then offer continuous monitoring of weather from space at any point of the globe. This capacity would represent a breakthrough for short- and long-term weather forecasting and narrowing uncertainties in the knowledge of the Earth’s climate through better sampling and more accurate characterization of the diurnal cycle. MAP HEO systems can be launched at critical inclination and are characterized by a local minimum of ionizing radiation. These features simplify the process of orbit maintenance, reduce radiation shielding requirements, and favor a longer lifetime of the mission. Unlike previously considered HEO systems implemented for communications, such as 12-h Molniya and 24-h Sirius radio systems, a MAP HEO constellation achieves a uniform geometrical sampling, which reduces view angle dependent biases. These observational conditions with complete coverage of the diurnal cycle, diverse range of solar illumination, and viewing observational conditions are beneficial for high-latitude meteorological and climate applications, such as the retrieval of Essential Climate Variables (ECV).
Abstract
A novel type of multiple-apogee highly elliptical orbits termed as MAP HEO with a period of rotation between 14 h and 15 h is introduced. These orbits are designed to achieve continuous geostationary (GEO)-like imaging of the polar regions in an optimum way. The combination of GEO and HEO satellites would then offer continuous monitoring of weather from space at any point of the globe. This capacity would represent a breakthrough for short- and long-term weather forecasting and narrowing uncertainties in the knowledge of the Earth’s climate through better sampling and more accurate characterization of the diurnal cycle. MAP HEO systems can be launched at critical inclination and are characterized by a local minimum of ionizing radiation. These features simplify the process of orbit maintenance, reduce radiation shielding requirements, and favor a longer lifetime of the mission. Unlike previously considered HEO systems implemented for communications, such as 12-h Molniya and 24-h Sirius radio systems, a MAP HEO constellation achieves a uniform geometrical sampling, which reduces view angle dependent biases. These observational conditions with complete coverage of the diurnal cycle, diverse range of solar illumination, and viewing observational conditions are beneficial for high-latitude meteorological and climate applications, such as the retrieval of Essential Climate Variables (ECV).
