Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author or Editor: P. R. Rowntree x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All Modify Search
D. Gregory
and
P. R. Rowntree

Abstract

The convection scheme used at the UK Meteorological Office in large-scale numerical models is described. The scheme uses a “bulk” cloud model to represent an ensemble of convective clouds and aims to represent shallow, deep and midlevel convection. A simple closure is employed, the initial convective mass flux being related to the stability of the initial convecting layer. The ability of the scheme to represent convective processes in a variety of situations is evaluated using GATE, BOMEX, and ATEX data. In each case realistic heating rates are simulated and although the closure of the scheme does not demand a balance between convective and large-scale forcings as in many other types of convection scheme (for example the Arakawa–Schubert scheme), a quasi-equilibrium is established while retaining realistic atmospheric structure.

The performance of the scheme in an 11-layer atmospheric general circulation model used in climate research at the UK Meteorological Office is also evaluated by comparing aspects of the simulated tropical flow from a recent 4-year integration with observed data. The scheme simulates the main areas of latent heat release and their variation throughout the year, although the Indian Monsoon is poorly simulated. The upper level divergent circulation is also well simulated, although too weak in northern summer. The zonally averaged tropospheric temperature structure is reasonable indicating that the interaction of convective and radiative processes is reasonably modeled. The variation of outgoing longwave radiation (a proxy for convective rainfall in the tropics) with sea surface temperature agrees with recent observational studies.

Full access
J. Lean
and
P. R. Rowntree

Abstract

No abstract available.

Full access
J. Lean
and
P. R. Rowntree

Abstract

The experiment reported on here presents a realistic portrayal of Amazonian deforestation that uses measurements of vegetation characteristics, taken as part of the Anglo–Brazilian Amazonian Climate Observation Study field campaigns, to define the forest and replacement pasture vegetation in the Hadley Centre GCM. The duration of the main experiment (10 yr) leads to greater confidence in assessing regional changes than in previous shorter experiments.

Complete removal of the Amazonian forest produced area-mean changes that resemble earlier experiments with decreases in evaporation of 0.76 mm day−1 (18%) and rainfall of 0.27 mm day−1 (4%) and a rise in surface temperature of 2.3°C. However, the relative changes in magnitude indicate that increased moisture convergence partly compensates for the reduced evaporation, in contrast to many previous deforestation experiments. Results also showed large regional variations in the change in annual mean rainfall over South America, with widespread decreases over most of the deforested area and increases near the Andes.

A better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the final deforested climate has been gained by carrying out additional experiments that examine the response to separate changes in roughness and albedo. Increased albedo resulted in widespread significant decreases in rainfall due to less moisture convergence and ascent. The response to reduced roughness is more complex but of comparable importance; in this experiment it was dominated by an increase in low-level wind speeds resulting in decreased moisture convergence and rainfall near the upwind edge of the area and the opposite near the downwind boundary where the increased flow meets the Andes.

In the standard deforestation scenario all vegetation parameters were modified together with one soil parameter—the maximum infiltration rate, which is reduced to represent the observed compaction of soil following deforestation. Results from a further experiment, in which the maximum infiltration rate was left unchanged, showed much smaller reductions in evaporation of 0.3 mm day−1 (7%) and indicated that the predicted regional changes in rainfall and evaporation were very sensitive to this parameter.

Full access