Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 13,013 items for :

  • Longwave radiation x
  • Refine by Access: All Content x
Clear All
Vincent E. Larson
,
Kurt E. Kotenberg
, and
Norman B. Wood

participants can easily implement the same radiative formula. Second, LESs usually last 6 h or less, a period too short to heat or cool clear air significantly, thereby vitiating the advantage of accurate multiband radiative calculations for gaseous absorption. Third, an analytic longwave formula is computationally inexpensive. This is advantageous because considerable expense is associated with both LES and numerical radiation calculations. LES is expensive because it requires a small grid size (often

Full access
S. M. S. Costa
and
K. P. Shine

article is intended to be a pedagogical discussion of one component of the KT97 figure [which was not updated in Trenberth et al. (2009) ], which is the amount of longwave radiation labeled “atmospheric window.” KT97 estimate this component to be 40 W m −2 compared to the total outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) of 235 W m −2 ; however, KT97 make clear that their estimate is “somewhat ad hoc” rather than the product of detailed calculations. The estimate was based on their calculation of the

Full access
Rosie Howard
and
Roland Stull

shown that snow surface temperature and snow liquid water content can affect ski–snow friction ( Colbeck 1988 , 1992 ) and hence the outcome of ski races ( Fauve et al. 2005 ). The snow-surface temperature of a ski run is affected by the four components of the radiation budget: upwelling and downwelling shortwave and longwave radiation. Colbeck (1994) observed that a 4°C temperature variation is possible between shady and sunny conditions, showing the importance of downwelling shortwave radiation

Full access
Hai-Tien Lee
,
Arnold Gruber
,
Robert G. Ellingson
, and
Istvan Laszlo

1. Introduction In the late 1980s Ellingson et al. (1989) successfully developed a multispectral regression technique using the radiance observations from the High Resolution Infrared Radiation Sounder (HIRS) to estimate the outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) at the top of the atmosphere. Acknowledging its better accuracy and other advantages over the long-standing National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) OLR, which is estimated

Full access
Patrick C. Taylor

important for understanding climate. Initial interest in the outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) diurnal cycle stemmed from attempts to determine the Earth energy budget from sun-synchronous satellite measurements ( Raschke and Bandeen 1970 ). Raschke and Bandeen (1970) present the first indications of OLR diurnal cycle characteristics using noon-minus-midnight differences, identifying large OLR diurnal cycles over land in desert and convective regions. Short and Wallace (1980) also used day

Full access
Vladimir M. Krasnopolsky
,
Michael S. Fox-Rabinovitz
, and
Alexei A. Belochitski

applications in different fields and, more specifically, to accurate and fast modeling of atmospheric radiative processes ( Krasnopolsky 1997 ; Chevallier et al. 1998 ) and for satellite retrieval procedures (e.g., Krasnopolsky 1997 ; Krasnopolsky and Schiller 2003 ). The NN techniques have been successfully applied to development of a new longwave radiation parameterization (“NeuroFlux”) for the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model ( Chevallier et al. 1998 , 2000

Full access
Jonah K. Shaw
and
Jennifer E. Kay

have extensively researched climate change emergence at the Arctic surface, the emergence of changes in the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) energy budget remains relatively unexplored. Change in TOA radiative energy captures both the drivers of and responses to anthropogenic emissions (e.g., Forster et al. 2021 ), making it a fundamental indicator of climate change. Observations from NASA’s Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) mission have measured broadband short- and longwave radiation

Open access
Pamela E. Mlynczak
,
G. Louis Smith
,
Anne C. Wilber
, and
Paul W. Stackhouse

1. Introduction Fluxes of radiation at the surface of the earth are intimately related to climate. The weather/climate system is a heat engine for which the source of heat is the sun’s radiation. Most of the radiation from the sun that is absorbed by the earth–atmosphere system is absorbed at the surface. When averaged over a month, the longwave radiation flux emitted by the surface and the longwave flux from the atmosphere down to the surface both exceed the radiation absorbed from the sun

Full access
Jing Feng
and
Yi Huang

1. Introduction The outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) is a critical variable as it balances the incoming solar (shortwave) radiation and shapes Earth’s climate. In essence, OLR is the irradiance flux F contributed by the outgoing radiances I emerging from the top of the atmosphere (TOA) at all possible angles. Their relationship can be expressed as Eq. (1) , assuming azimuthal homogeneity: (1) F ⁡ ( υ ) = ∫ 0 2 π ∫ 0 π / 2 I ⁡ ( υ , θ )   sin ⁡ ( θ )   cos ⁡ ( θ )   d θ   d ϕ = 2 π ∫ 0 π

Full access
Ming-Dah Chou
,
Jack Chung-Chieh Yu
,
Wei-Liang Lee
,
Chein-Jung Shiu
,
Kyu-Tae Lee
,
Il-Sung Zo
,
Joon-Bum Jee
, and
Bu-Yo Kim

in the respective sphere (troposphere or stratosphere) and over the three typical atmospheres. The difference is <0.1 K day −1 in the troposphere and <0.7 K day −1 in the stratosphere. Table 3 demonstrates the maximum difference in the outgoing longwave radiation at the top of the atmosphere, OLR, and the downward flux at the surface (SFC) due to the absorption by each of the five gases. The maximum is taken over the three typical atmospheres. The difference is <0.50 W m −2 in all cases

Free access