Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 27,107 items for :

  • Parameterization x
  • All content x
Clear All
John Thuburn, Hilary Weller, Geoffrey K. Vallis, Robert J. Beare, and Michael Whitall

1. Introduction In weather and climate models, various important processes occur on scales that are too fine to be resolved. These processes must therefore be represented by subgrid models or “parameterizations”; for an introduction and overview, see, for example, Mote and O’Neill (2000) , Randall (2000) , and Kalnay (2003) . A formal theoretical framework on which to build a subgrid model can be obtained by applying a spatial filter to the governing equations (e.g., Leonard 1975 ; Germano

Full access
Young Cheol Kwon and Song-You Hong

1. Introduction The representation of cumulus convection, generally called cumulus parameterization, has almost always been at the core of efforts to numerically model the atmospheric phenomena because cumulus convection plays a central role in most of the interactions between physical processes in the atmosphere ( Arakawa 2004 ). This is because a cumulus parameterization scheme (CPS) should represent the impacts of convection in terms of environmental conditions, whereas a microphysics scheme

Full access
Z. J. Lebo, C. R. Williams, G. Feingold, and V. E. Larson

distinction between cloud types; in nature, there is a continuum between these cloud types. Recent advances in the representation of subgrid-scale processes in climate models, for example, the Cloud Layers Unified by Binomials (CLUBB) parameterization ( Golaz et al. 2002 ; Larson and Golaz 2005 ; Larson et al. 2012 ; Larson and Griffin 2013 ; Griffin and Larson 2013 ) or the parameterizations of Cheng and Xu (2009) and Boutle et al. (2014) , use a unified framework that can represent clouds and

Full access
Winston C. Chao

. 2 Increasing horizontal resolution does not ameliorate this problem, as long as the existing cumulus parameterization schemes are employed and individual clouds are not resolved ( Dirmeyer et al. 2012 ). The poorly simulated PDC has adverse effects on the surface energy budget, the atmospheric branch of the hydrological cycle, and the cloud–radiation interactions. These defects have a negative impact on GCMs' performance in weather and climate forecasts and in data assimilation. Recently, the

Full access
Baylor Fox-Kemper and Raffaele Ferrari

scales, so the overturning effect of MLEs must be parameterized. Even “eddy resolving” GCMs with O (10 km) grids require parameterization of the still unresolved submesoscale. The buoyancy fluxes needed for the buoyancy budget in a GCM may be spectrally decomposed into three categories: fluxes by resolved large-scale and mesoscale phenomena ( ), 1 submesoscale fluxes ( ), and smaller-scale turbulent, solar, and diffusive fluxes ℱ. The double overline indicates horizontal averaging onto the grid

Full access
Hiromasa Yoshimura, Ryo Mizuta, and Hiroyuki Murakami

1. Introduction Cumulus parameterization schemes are used in atmospheric models at horizontal resolutions of about 5 km or coarser (e.g., Mizuta et al. 2006 ; Kanada et al. 2008 ) so that the effect of subgrid-scale cumulus clouds can be taken into consideration. Simulations by models at horizontal resolutions from 1 to 3 km have some success without cumulus schemes (e.g., Lilly 1990 ; Posselt et al. 2008 ; Satoh et al. 2008 ; Eito et al. 2010 ). However, horizontal resolution on the

Full access
Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Song-You Hong, Jin-Ho Yoon, and Jongil Han

1. Introduction One of the challenges to improve simulated precipitation lies in the elaboration of the cloud and precipitation processes, which are parameterized by a microphysics scheme (MPS) as well as a cumulus parameterization scheme (CPS) in a regional climate or mesoscale model. An MPS simulates the precipitation based on gridcell-mean (i.e., resolved) variables when the gridcell-mean relative humidity is greater than 100%. Meanwhile, a CPS simulates the precipitation depending on the

Full access
Christopher S. Bretherton and Sungsu Park

1. Introduction Parameterizations of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) turbulence in global weather and climate prediction models must skillfully handle many different turbulence regimes. Many ABL parameterizations have been developed using extensive measurements of boundary layers over land across the diurnal and seasonal cycle in diverse weather regimes. However, most of the earth’s surface is covered by ocean. Marine boundary layers play an important role not only for surface fluxes, but also

Full access
Corinna Ziemer and Ulrike Wacker

1. Introduction In numerical weather prediction and climate models, the calculation of precipitation processes is carried out by using bulk microphysics parameterizations for the sake of computational efficiency. In such models, the cloud microphysics are taken into account by describing their effects on a few bulk properties of the cloud, such as drop number density N and liquid water content L . These are moments of the hydrometeor size distribution function (“spectrum”), or are

Full access
Paul Spence, Oleg A. Saenko, Michael Eby, and Andrew J. Weaver

, a change in the dense-to-light water conversion in the Southern Ocean could translate into a change in the light-to-dense water conversion in the north, and vice versa. In models, the degree of this north–south connection may depend on the representation of the individual components of the MOC. In particular, coarse-resolution models that capture only the large-scale features of the circulation are obliged to parameterize the effects of unresolved mesoscale motions, that is, the motions that

Full access