We are grateful to Kirsty Lewis for discussions and a review of the final draft. Authors Kirstine I. Dale, Edward C. D. Pope, Aaron R. Hopkinson, Theo McCaie, and Jason A. Lowe were supported by the Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by BEIS and Defra.
Barricelli, B. R., E. Casiraghi, and D. Fogli, 2019: A survey on digital twin: Definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access, 7, 167 653–167 671, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499.
Bauer, P., B. Stevens, and W. Hazeleger, 2021: A digital twin of Earth for the green transition. Nat. Climate Change, 11, 80–83, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-00986-y.
Blair, G. S., 2021: Digital twins of the natural environment. Patterns, 2, 100359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100359.
Blair, G. S., P. Henrys, A. Leeson, J. Watkins, E. Eastoe, S. Jarvis, and P. J. Young, 2019: Data science of the natural environment: A research roadmap. Front. Environ. Sci., 7, 121, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00121.
Colombo, A. W., S. Karnouskos, O. Kaynak, Y. Shi, and S. Yin, 2017: Industrial cyberphysical systems: A backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag., 11, 6–16, https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2017.2648857.
Czech, P., K. Turoń, and J. Barcik, 2018: Autonomous vehicles: Basic issues. Zesz. Nauk. Transp. Politech. Śląska, 100, 15–22, https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2018.100.2.
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2022: Enabling a national cyber-physical infrastructure to catalyse innovation: Understanding the opportunities for connected digital twins and other advanced cyber-physical systems. U.K. Government, 58 pp., https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1071905/enabling-national-cyber-physical-infrastructure.pdf.
European Commission, 2021: Destination Earth. Accessed 8 May 2023, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/destination-earth.
Findlater, K., S. Webber, M. Kandlikar, and S. Donner, 2021: Climate services promise better decisions but mainly focus on better data. Nat. Climate Change, 11, 731–737, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01125-3.
Fuller, A., Z. Fan, C. Day, and C. Barlow, 2020: Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8, 108 952–108 971, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358.
Grieves, M., 2015: Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. Digital Twin White Paper, 8 pp., https://www.3ds.com/fileadmin/PRODUCTS-SERVICES/DELMIA/PDF/Whitepaper/DELMIA-APRISO-Digital-Twin-Whitepaper.pdf.
Huang, T., and Coauthors, 2022: An Earth system digital twin for flood prediction and analysis. IGARSS 2022–2022 IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 4735–4738, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022.9884830.
IPCC, 2023a: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, 3056 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.
IPCC, 2023b: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 2030 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.
Jiang, Y., S. Yin, K. Li, H. Luo, and O. Kaynak, 2021: Industrial applications of digital twins. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A379, 20200360, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0360.
Jones, D., C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J. Yon, and B. Hicks, 2020: Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 29, 36–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002.
Juarez, M. G., V. J. Botti, and A. S. Giret, 2021: Digital twins: Review and challenges. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 21, 030802, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050244.
Mõttus, M., and Coauthors, 2021: A methodology for implementing a digital twin of the Earth’s forests to match the requirements of different user groups. GI Forum, 9, 130–136, https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2021_01_s130.
Nalau, J., E. Torabi, N. Edwards, M. Howes, and E. Morgan, 2021: A critical exploration of adaptation heuristics. Climate Risk Manage., 32, 100292, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100292.
Nativi, S., P. Mazzetti, and M. Craglia, 2021: Digital ecosystems for developing digital twins of the Earth: The Destination Earth case. Remote Sens., 13, 2119, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112119.
Rasheed, A., O. San, and T. Kvamsdal, 2020: Digital twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21 980–22 012, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143.
Semeraro, C., M. Lezoche, H. Panetto, and M. Dassisti, 2021: Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind., 130, 103469, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469.
Topping, D., T. Bannan, H. Coe, J. Evans, C. E. Jay, E. Murabito, and N. Robinson, 2021: Digital twins of urban air quality: Opportunities and challenges. Front. Sustainable Cities, 3, 786563, https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.786563.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, 1974: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Tzachor, A., C. E. Richards, and S. Jeen, 2022: Transforming agrifood production systems and supply chains with digital twins. npj Sci. Food, 6, 47, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-022-00162-2.
Vallance, P., and S. Belcher, 2021: The need for action on climate change is urgent. U.K. Government, accessed 20 September 2022, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-need-for-action-on-climate-change-is-urgent.
Voosen, P., 2020: Europe is building a ‘digital twin’ of Earth to revolutionize climate forecasts. Science, 1 October, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf0687.
Wright, L., and S. Davidson, 2020: How to tell the difference between a model and a digital twin. Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci., 7, 13, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-020-00147-4.