A Measurement of the Velocity Field of a Cumulus Cloud

J. Levine Experimental Meteorology Laboratory, NOAA, Coral Gables, Fla.

Search for other papers by J. Levine in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Garstang Dept. of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville

Search for other papers by M. Garstang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
N. E. LaSeur Dept. of Meteorology, Florida State University, Tallahassee

Search for other papers by N. E. LaSeur in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

A 3-hr flight of a constant-volume balloon which is entrained into a cumulus congestus cloud and lifted to an altitude of nearly 3 km provides an opportunity to determine the trajectory and vertical velocity of the balloon and, in turn, relate these to the circulation of the cloud. Simultaneous supplementary observations by radar, cameras, satellite, and other ground based instruments provide the meteorological context for the event. Computations show that the vertical velocities of the cloud may approach 10 m sec−1, and sustained upward velocities of 3–5 m sec−1 are maintained for considerable periods of time and height. Comparison with a “jet” model shows remarkable agreement, while the “bubble” model would require unreasonably large values of the radius to generate the observed vertical velocities.

Abstract

A 3-hr flight of a constant-volume balloon which is entrained into a cumulus congestus cloud and lifted to an altitude of nearly 3 km provides an opportunity to determine the trajectory and vertical velocity of the balloon and, in turn, relate these to the circulation of the cloud. Simultaneous supplementary observations by radar, cameras, satellite, and other ground based instruments provide the meteorological context for the event. Computations show that the vertical velocities of the cloud may approach 10 m sec−1, and sustained upward velocities of 3–5 m sec−1 are maintained for considerable periods of time and height. Comparison with a “jet” model shows remarkable agreement, while the “bubble” model would require unreasonably large values of the radius to generate the observed vertical velocities.

Save