All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 167 17 1
PDF Downloads 33 13 0

Parameterization of Surface Evaporation Rate for Use in Numerical Modeling

Tsann-Wang YuTechniques Development Laboratory, National Weather Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, Md. 20910

Search for other papers by Tsann-Wang Yu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Numerical models require parameterization of surface evaporation rates when a surface energy budget equation is included in the calculation of the surface temperature. Techniques for parameterizing surface moisture and evaporation are reviewed. Two methods in particular are investigated with observational data taken from the Wangara, the O'Neill, the Kerang and the Davis experiments. Method I is based on parameterization of the surface moisture with the surface evaporation computed through the flux-profile similarity relationships. Method II is based on a modified form of the Penman equation which requires a knowledge of solar radiation and soil heat flux to calculate surface evaporation. Comparisons of the results of these methods are made with observations. Method I fails to account for condensation which is often observed during the night. Method II is shown to be superior to Method I in the calculation of surface evaporation for both day and night.

Abstract

Numerical models require parameterization of surface evaporation rates when a surface energy budget equation is included in the calculation of the surface temperature. Techniques for parameterizing surface moisture and evaporation are reviewed. Two methods in particular are investigated with observational data taken from the Wangara, the O'Neill, the Kerang and the Davis experiments. Method I is based on parameterization of the surface moisture with the surface evaporation computed through the flux-profile similarity relationships. Method II is based on a modified form of the Penman equation which requires a knowledge of solar radiation and soil heat flux to calculate surface evaporation. Comparisons of the results of these methods are made with observations. Method I fails to account for condensation which is often observed during the night. Method II is shown to be superior to Method I in the calculation of surface evaporation for both day and night.

Save