| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 232 | 47 | 3 |
| PDF Downloads | 84 | 33 | 2 |
Displayed acceptance dates for articles published prior to 2023 are approximate to within a week. If needed, exact acceptance dates can be obtained by emailing amsjol@ametsoc.org.
Comparisons between measurements of a wind component by a Doppler lidar and by a conventional anemometer are presented. The two measurement techniques provided thirteen 15 min data sets which agreed within 0.04 m s−1 on the average. The maximum difference was 0.12 m s−1, which constitutes less than 3% discrepancy, referred to the period average. The results conclusively demonstrate the ability of Doppler lidar to measure winds with a high degree of velocity resolution and accuracy.
Comparisons between measurements of a wind component by a Doppler lidar and by a conventional anemometer are presented. The two measurement techniques provided thirteen 15 min data sets which agreed within 0.04 m s−1 on the average. The maximum difference was 0.12 m s−1, which constitutes less than 3% discrepancy, referred to the period average. The results conclusively demonstrate the ability of Doppler lidar to measure winds with a high degree of velocity resolution and accuracy.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 232 | 47 | 3 |
| PDF Downloads | 84 | 33 | 2 |
AMS Publications
Get Involved with AMS
Follow Us
Contact Us
Email: amsjol@ametsoc.org
Phone: 617-227-2425
Fax: 617-742-8718
Headquarters:
45 Beacon Street
Boston, MA 02108-3693
DC Office:
1200 New York Ave NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 200005-3928