An Examination of Some Simple Numerical Schemes for Calculating Scalar Advection

P. E. Long Jr. Savannah River Laboratory, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Aiken, SC 29808

Search for other papers by P. E. Long Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
D. W. Pepper Savannah River Laboratory, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Aiken, SC 29808

Search for other papers by D. W. Pepper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The computational damping and dispersion errors of some simple numerical schemes for calculating the advection of a scalar are analyzed. Computation times and accuracy are compared in calculating the two-dimensional transport of a symmetrical distribution in a uniform rotational flow field. Amplification factors, computational phase velocities and effective diffusion coefficients are used to examine the properties of the schemes. Simple tests show that the more accurate methods do not require significantly more computing times in both one and two-dimensional constant and variable flows.

Among the better schemes, none can be singled out as “best”. The cubic-spline and second-moment methods are particularly useful for regions of sharp concentration gradients or telescoping grids where the undamped, negative group velocities of the chapeau method prove troublesome. The “best” scheme depends heavily on the geometry and physics of the problem.

Abstract

The computational damping and dispersion errors of some simple numerical schemes for calculating the advection of a scalar are analyzed. Computation times and accuracy are compared in calculating the two-dimensional transport of a symmetrical distribution in a uniform rotational flow field. Amplification factors, computational phase velocities and effective diffusion coefficients are used to examine the properties of the schemes. Simple tests show that the more accurate methods do not require significantly more computing times in both one and two-dimensional constant and variable flows.

Among the better schemes, none can be singled out as “best”. The cubic-spline and second-moment methods are particularly useful for regions of sharp concentration gradients or telescoping grids where the undamped, negative group velocities of the chapeau method prove troublesome. The “best” scheme depends heavily on the geometry and physics of the problem.

Save