Calibrations of Johnson-Williams Liquid Water Content Meters in a High-Speed Icing Tunnel

J. Walter Strapp Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada, M3H 5T4

Search for other papers by J. Walter Strapp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Robert S. Schemenauer Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada, M3H 5T4

Search for other papers by Robert S. Schemenauer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Wind tunnel tests have provided calibrations and intercomparisons of 14 Johnson-Williams (J–W) cloud liquid water content (LWC) measuring devices with 23 sensor heads from 10 research organizations. The absolute tunnel LWC was deduced using a rotating icing cylinder technique accurate to ∼5%.

A significant fraction of the systems arrived at the tunnel with nonfunctional shell or strut heaters, which can degrade measurements below 0°C. Several sensor heads exhibited airspeed dependencies. Switching heads sometimes produced calibration changes. At −15°C an instrument problem was discovered associated with icing of the compensating wire posts, which resulted in mild to severe measurement errors in 75% of the sensor heads at 103 m s−1.

Calibrations at −5°C revealed that J-W measurements usually varied linearly with tunnel LWC, but sometimes with a slope differing from unity, implying that the system dummy head did not always define the correct conversion from J-W output voltage to grams per cubic meter. No more than six of the 13 systems tested at −5°C agreed to within 20% of the tunnel LWC with each of their sensor heads, but at least 10 of 13 did so with one sensor head. At −15°C similar results were obtained, but most systems suffered from the aforementioned icing problem, resulting in unreliable small-scale measurements.

Abstract

Wind tunnel tests have provided calibrations and intercomparisons of 14 Johnson-Williams (J–W) cloud liquid water content (LWC) measuring devices with 23 sensor heads from 10 research organizations. The absolute tunnel LWC was deduced using a rotating icing cylinder technique accurate to ∼5%.

A significant fraction of the systems arrived at the tunnel with nonfunctional shell or strut heaters, which can degrade measurements below 0°C. Several sensor heads exhibited airspeed dependencies. Switching heads sometimes produced calibration changes. At −15°C an instrument problem was discovered associated with icing of the compensating wire posts, which resulted in mild to severe measurement errors in 75% of the sensor heads at 103 m s−1.

Calibrations at −5°C revealed that J-W measurements usually varied linearly with tunnel LWC, but sometimes with a slope differing from unity, implying that the system dummy head did not always define the correct conversion from J-W output voltage to grams per cubic meter. No more than six of the 13 systems tested at −5°C agreed to within 20% of the tunnel LWC with each of their sensor heads, but at least 10 of 13 did so with one sensor head. At −15°C similar results were obtained, but most systems suffered from the aforementioned icing problem, resulting in unreliable small-scale measurements.

Save