Physical Interpretation of Results from the HIPLEX-1 Experiment

William A. Cooper Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

Search for other papers by William A. Cooper in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
R. Paul Lawson Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

Search for other papers by R. Paul Lawson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

The general characteristics of the clouds that were included in the HIPLEX-1 experiment are reviewed, and the results for the response variables are interpreted in light of other measurements from the instrumented aircraft. In most seeded clouds, the HIPLEX-1 experimental hypothesis corresponded with the observed precipitation development for only the first ∼8 min after seeding. The failure to obtain a stronger statistical result is attributed to the inherent inefficiency of the small cumulus congestus selected as experimental units. This inefficiency was only partly due to low ice concentrations; a more significant cause of the low precipitation efficiency was the limited lifetime and low liquid water content of these clouds. Some calculations which indicate that these clouds could not support a rapid enough accretional growth process to lead to precipitation after seeding are discussed. Other reasons for the successes and failures of the experiment are discussed.

Abstract

The general characteristics of the clouds that were included in the HIPLEX-1 experiment are reviewed, and the results for the response variables are interpreted in light of other measurements from the instrumented aircraft. In most seeded clouds, the HIPLEX-1 experimental hypothesis corresponded with the observed precipitation development for only the first ∼8 min after seeding. The failure to obtain a stronger statistical result is attributed to the inherent inefficiency of the small cumulus congestus selected as experimental units. This inefficiency was only partly due to low ice concentrations; a more significant cause of the low precipitation efficiency was the limited lifetime and low liquid water content of these clouds. Some calculations which indicate that these clouds could not support a rapid enough accretional growth process to lead to precipitation after seeding are discussed. Other reasons for the successes and failures of the experiment are discussed.

Save