Estimating the Probability of Rain in an SSM/I FOV Using Logistic Regression

David S. Crosby NOAA/NESDIS/Office of Research and Applications, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by David S. Crosby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ralph R. Ferraro NOAA/NESDIS/Office of Research and Applications, Camp Springs, Maryland

Search for other papers by Ralph R. Ferraro in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Helen Wu American University, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by Helen Wu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

The SSM/I has been used successfully to estimate precipitation and to determine the fields of view (FOV) that contain precipitating clouds. The use of multivariate logistic regression with the SSM/I brightness temperatures to estimate the probability that it is raining in an FOV is examined. The predictors used in this study are those that have been evaluated by other investigators to estimate rain events using other procedures. The logistic regression technique is applied to a matched set of SSM/I and radar data for a limited area from June to August 1989. For this limited dataset the results are quite good. In one example, if the predicted probability is less than 0.1, the radar data shows only 2 of 340 FOVs have precipitation. If the predicted probability is greater than 0.9, the radar data shows precipitation in 748 of 774 FOVS. These probabilities can be used for both instantaneous and climate timescale retrievals.

Abstract

The SSM/I has been used successfully to estimate precipitation and to determine the fields of view (FOV) that contain precipitating clouds. The use of multivariate logistic regression with the SSM/I brightness temperatures to estimate the probability that it is raining in an FOV is examined. The predictors used in this study are those that have been evaluated by other investigators to estimate rain events using other procedures. The logistic regression technique is applied to a matched set of SSM/I and radar data for a limited area from June to August 1989. For this limited dataset the results are quite good. In one example, if the predicted probability is less than 0.1, the radar data shows only 2 of 340 FOVs have precipitation. If the predicted probability is greater than 0.9, the radar data shows precipitation in 748 of 774 FOVS. These probabilities can be used for both instantaneous and climate timescale retrievals.

Save