• Straka, J. M., M. S. Gilmore, K. M. Kanak, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2005: A comparison of the conservation of number concentration for the continuous collection and vapor diffusion growth equations using one- and two-moment schemes. J. Appl. Meteor., 44 , 18441849.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 22 19 2
PDF Downloads 2 2 0

CORRIGENDUM

View More View Less
  • 1 School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
  • | 2 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
  • | 3 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
© Get Permissions
Full access

Corresponding author address: Jerry M. Straka, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072. Email: jstraka@ou.edu

Corresponding author address: Jerry M. Straka, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 120 David L. Boren Blvd., Norman, OK 73072. Email: jstraka@ou.edu

Three equations contain errors in Straka et al. (2005), although they were programmed correctly for the work presented. Equation (10) should have read
i1558-8432-46-7-1138-e10
that is, there was an incorrect factor of Nt in the numerator. Equation (11) should have read
i1558-8432-46-7-1138-e11
that is, the gamma terms were omitted. Equation (13) should have read
i1558-8432-46-7-1138-e13
that is, there was an incorrect factor of Nx in the numerator. In addition, Tables 2 and 3 have been updated after eliminating a computer coding error in which some of the input values correctly presented in the paper were incorrectly coded in the simple model. With the correction to the code, scheme E is the second best for collection growth instead of scheme A (but not for diffusion growth).

REFERENCES

Straka, J. M., M. S. Gilmore, K. M. Kanak, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2005: A comparison of the conservation of number concentration for the continuous collection and vapor diffusion growth equations using one- and two-moment schemes. J. Appl. Meteor., 44 , 18441849.

  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation

Table 2.

Results from vapor diffusion growth of an ice sphere from 0 to 300 s. In columns A–F, the top values are the 300-s valuesand the bottom values are the errors relative to scheme F. Relative differences (RD; percent) are based on 100 × |(true−predicted) × true−1|, where true values are from scheme F and predicted values are from the other schemes.

Table 2.
Table 3.

As in Table 2, but for continuous collection growth.

Table 3.
Save