Air Flow and Particle Trajectories around Aircraft Fuselages. II: Measurements

W. D. King Cloud Physics Laboratory, Division of Atmospheric Research, CSIRO, Sydney, Australid

Search for other papers by W. D. King in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. E. Turvey Cloud Physics Laboratory, Division of Atmospheric Research, CSIRO, Sydney, Australid

Search for other papers by D. E. Turvey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Williams Cloud Physics Laboratory, Division of Atmospheric Research, CSIRO, Sydney, Australid

Search for other papers by D. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
D. J. Llewellyn Cloud Physics Laboratory, Division of Atmospheric Research, CSIRO, Sydney, Australid

Search for other papers by D. J. Llewellyn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Measurements have been made of airflow velocities and cloud liquid water contents from selected positions around the fuselage of an F-27 aircraft. The airflow measurements away from the propeller inflow region are in reasonable agreement with those calculated in Part I. The liquid water measurements were made using two CSIRO hot-wire probes, one of which could be positioned at distances of 15–60 cm from the fuselage. Results of these comparisons showed that the enhancement factors calculated in Part I appear quite reasonable and that corrections can consequently be made to allow for sampling errors caused by fuselage-related flow distortions. The comparisons also show that there are additional sampling errors as large as 10% which depend on position of the probe relative to the wings and propeller. For the F-27 these additional effects decrease substantially with increasing aircraft speed.

Abstract

Measurements have been made of airflow velocities and cloud liquid water contents from selected positions around the fuselage of an F-27 aircraft. The airflow measurements away from the propeller inflow region are in reasonable agreement with those calculated in Part I. The liquid water measurements were made using two CSIRO hot-wire probes, one of which could be positioned at distances of 15–60 cm from the fuselage. Results of these comparisons showed that the enhancement factors calculated in Part I appear quite reasonable and that corrections can consequently be made to allow for sampling errors caused by fuselage-related flow distortions. The comparisons also show that there are additional sampling errors as large as 10% which depend on position of the probe relative to the wings and propeller. For the F-27 these additional effects decrease substantially with increasing aircraft speed.

Save