All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 274 55 9
PDF Downloads 99 33 0

Mesoscale Ocean Surface Current Structure Detected by High-Frequency Radar

Lynn K. ShayDivision of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Lynn K. Shay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hans C. GraberDivision of Applied Marine Physics, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Hans C. Graber in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Duncan B. RossDivision of Applied Marine Physics, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Duncan B. Ross in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rickey D. ChapmanSpace Oceanography Group, Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland

Search for other papers by Rickey D. Chapman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

The quality and vertical correlation scales of high-frequency (HF) radar-derived ocean surface current measurements from an ocean surface current radar (OSCR) are assessed by comparing surface to subsurface current observations from 11 June to 8 July 1993 at directional discus buoys DW and DE, each instrumented with a three-axis ultrasonic current meter at the 13.8- and 9.5-m depths, respectively. A dual-station OSCR mapped the current fields at 20-min intervals at a horizontal resolution of 1.2 km over a 30 km × 44 km domain inshore of the Gulf Stream using the HF (25.4 MHz) mode. Over a 27-day experimental period, surface current observations were acquired 97% of the time extending to the maximum theoretical range of 44 km. Linear regression analyses indicated a bias of 2–4 cm s−1 and slopes of O(1). While there were periods when the daily averaged complex correlation coefficients were highly correlated (>0.8), periods of low correlation (<0.3) are explained in terms of vertical phase differences and a decoupling between surface and subsurface records.

Surface and subsurface current time series at the two mooring sites were decomposed into the tidal, mean (>48 h), near-inertial (20.7 h), and high-frequency (4.5 h) bands. Tidal analyses, based on the semidiurnal (K2, M2, L2, S2) and diurnal (K1, O1, P1, Q1) constituents, indicated maximum amplitudes of 5 cm s−1 at DW, whereas these amplitudes increased offshore to a maximum of 13 cm s−1 at DE. Net differences between the surface and subsurface tidal currents ranged between 2 and 5 cm s−1 with the largest difference of 7.7 cm s−1 for the K1, constituent at DE. The tidal currents were removed from the surface and subsurface current time series and low-pass filtered at 48 h, bandpass filtered between 18 and 23 h, and high-pass filtered at 8 h. The mean current components were highly correlated (>0.9) over most of the record with small phase differences. Intrusions of the mean flow at 3–5-day intervals were correlated with bursts of near-inertial motions having amplitudes of 20 cm s−1 at DE and 15 cm s−1 at DW. The frequency of these motions was shifted 5%–10% above and below fduring these episodes of mean flow intrusions. The higher-frequency surface motions with amplitudes of 5–8 cm s−1 oscillated at periods of 4.3–4.7 h but were directly out of phase with the subsurface currents, which caused the correlations to decrease below 0.3. Thus, temporal decorrelations appeared to be a result of high-frequency motions in the internal wave band between the inertial and Nyquist (1.5 cph) frequencies.

Abstract

The quality and vertical correlation scales of high-frequency (HF) radar-derived ocean surface current measurements from an ocean surface current radar (OSCR) are assessed by comparing surface to subsurface current observations from 11 June to 8 July 1993 at directional discus buoys DW and DE, each instrumented with a three-axis ultrasonic current meter at the 13.8- and 9.5-m depths, respectively. A dual-station OSCR mapped the current fields at 20-min intervals at a horizontal resolution of 1.2 km over a 30 km × 44 km domain inshore of the Gulf Stream using the HF (25.4 MHz) mode. Over a 27-day experimental period, surface current observations were acquired 97% of the time extending to the maximum theoretical range of 44 km. Linear regression analyses indicated a bias of 2–4 cm s−1 and slopes of O(1). While there were periods when the daily averaged complex correlation coefficients were highly correlated (>0.8), periods of low correlation (<0.3) are explained in terms of vertical phase differences and a decoupling between surface and subsurface records.

Surface and subsurface current time series at the two mooring sites were decomposed into the tidal, mean (>48 h), near-inertial (20.7 h), and high-frequency (4.5 h) bands. Tidal analyses, based on the semidiurnal (K2, M2, L2, S2) and diurnal (K1, O1, P1, Q1) constituents, indicated maximum amplitudes of 5 cm s−1 at DW, whereas these amplitudes increased offshore to a maximum of 13 cm s−1 at DE. Net differences between the surface and subsurface tidal currents ranged between 2 and 5 cm s−1 with the largest difference of 7.7 cm s−1 for the K1, constituent at DE. The tidal currents were removed from the surface and subsurface current time series and low-pass filtered at 48 h, bandpass filtered between 18 and 23 h, and high-pass filtered at 8 h. The mean current components were highly correlated (>0.9) over most of the record with small phase differences. Intrusions of the mean flow at 3–5-day intervals were correlated with bursts of near-inertial motions having amplitudes of 20 cm s−1 at DE and 15 cm s−1 at DW. The frequency of these motions was shifted 5%–10% above and below fduring these episodes of mean flow intrusions. The higher-frequency surface motions with amplitudes of 5–8 cm s−1 oscillated at periods of 4.3–4.7 h but were directly out of phase with the subsurface currents, which caused the correlations to decrease below 0.3. Thus, temporal decorrelations appeared to be a result of high-frequency motions in the internal wave band between the inertial and Nyquist (1.5 cph) frequencies.

Save