1. Introduction
Aerosols over the oceans are especially difficult to characterize because there are gaps in the fundamental knowledge about their climatology due in part to the absence of detailed, widespread observations (Haywood et al. 1999). Aerosols have a cooling effect on global climate, which can stabilize or perhaps even overcompensate the warming effect of greenhouse gases and thus lead to long-term cooling of the global climate (Schwartz 1996). Aerosol optical thickness (AOT) ranges from 0.02 over the open ocean to as high as 0.4 in industrialized and urban regions, and according to Wagener et al. (1997), an increase in the global average of 0.04 is sufficient to offset any longwave forcing from greenhouse gases.
Uncertainties in the contribution of aerosol loading is one of the largest sources of variability (error) in global climate models. Aerosols spanning in size from 10−4 to 102 μm play an important role in air pollution and atmospheric solar radiation. Terrestrial aerosols (pollens, spores, and dust) and anthropogenic aerosols (biomass burning, sulfate transformation) spread over the world’s oceans, where they may undergo wet or dry deposition, become dispersed, or be chemically transformed. Additional sources of aerosols are those naturally produced over the ocean, principally bursting bubbles and dimethylsulfide released by organisms. The concentration and size distribution of aerosols over the ocean is intimately linked to the synoptic-scale meteorological conditions that dictate air parcel trajectories. It is not uncommon to find large gradients in marine aerosol structure over relatively short distance scales (a few kilometers) or to find large areas with relatively uniform structure (1000 km2).
An understanding of the aerosol optical thickness is essential in satellite remote sensing over the oceans because it relates directly to the amount of radiance received at the spacecraft. Satellite observations of ocean color yield the distribution of phytoplankton pigment concentration and production and thus provide global coverage of biogeochemical (carbon and nutrient) activity. A great deal of the uncertainty in satellite retrievals of pigment concentration comes from our inability to correct for aerosol scattering and attenuation of water-leaving radiance, and this is a subject of intensive research at this time. Typically, 90% of the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) irradiance is composed of photons that have not interacted with the water body (Viollier et al. 1980; Schwindling et al. 1998).
This paper describes a fast-rotating shadowband radiometer (FRSR), a multispectral sun photometer that can be used to measure aerosol radiative characteristics from ships over the world’s oceans. These measurements can be used to develop climatologies of the aerosol optical thickness and a direct link between the aerosol distribution and the climatic impact of the aerosols as well as to validate the atmospheric correction algorithms used in ocean color satellites. At present, aerosol optical thickness measurements can be made at sea using hand-held sun photometers or motion-stabilized sun photometers. Hand-held sun photometers are relatively accurate if several units are used together to make measurements but require operators and typically are not used to make continuous measurements. Motion-stabilized sun photometers are expensive and sophisticated and are not available for autonomous deployment. A shipboard shadowband radiometer, with gimbals and stabilization motors, was tested by Guzzi et al. (1985) but never developed into an operational instrument. The FRSR, described in this paper (Fig. 1), does not require an operator or motion stabilization and is a candidate for widespread deployment to produce climatologies of aerosol optical thickness. In addition, it measures the diffuse and global irradiance, which can be used for cloud and radiation studies as described by Long (1996), Long et al. (1996), and Long and Ackerman (1999, manuscript submitted to J. Geophys. Res.).
After a brief review of the theory of aerosol thickness in section 2, a complete description of the FRSR hardware is given in section 3. The sweep-by-sweep data analysis procedure is described in section 4. Field measurements and a calibration at Mauna Loa Observatory (MLO) are reviewed in section 5. Finally, in section 6, we discuss the implications of these measurements, recent new datasets, and plans for further improvements.
2. Background
a. Basic concepts
The other absorbers here include stratospheric and tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2), uniformly mixed gases, and water vapor. These absorbers can be considered to be secondary to the aerosols, ozone, and Rayleigh terms. The NO2 absorption is most pronounced in the ultraviolet end of the spectrum (Davidson et al. 1988), and water vapor is strongest at the infrared end and beyond. Therefore, because this paper is focused on the technique of measurement and not on the details of the absorption chemistry, we will combine all other extinction terms with the aerosol scattering term (kA).
The ozone optical thickness can be computed from measurements of the ozone distribution or inferred from known ozone climatology. The ozone corrections used in this paper are quite small and were provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (M. Wang 1999, personal communication).
b. Calibration considerations
In all discussions after this point, the λ subscript will be dropped unless it is necessary for clarity. All development refers to monochromatic light, and wavelength dependency is implicit. The instrument bandpass and its effect on a spectrum of light are also hereafter implied. The discussion below is applied to all channels in the same fashion, and so unless it is necessary for clarity, the i subscript will be omitted.
Once I0 is established for an instrument, (13) is used to estimate aerosol optical thickness for each instantaneous measurement of IN. From the time and geographic location of the measurement, IT can be computed from the calibration constant, IT = I0/r2, and m can be computed accurately from (9) or estimated by secθT. After the contributions by Rayleigh scattering and ozone absorption are accounted for, τA remains.
c. Theory of shadowband radiometers
An estimate of τ can be made for every measurement of the solar beam irradiance IN when there are no clouds in front of the solar disk. Two sun photometer designs are commonly used: a narrowbeam detector mechanically pointed in the direction of the sun or a wide-field-of-view radiometer with a solar occulting apparatus. The first type of sun photometer (see Holben et al. 1998) requires careful angular positioning but can provide additional information on forward scattering phase functions and thus help characterize the aerosol constituents. The latter type of radiometer, a shadowband radiometer, measures the diffuse and global (upper hemispheric) irradiance and computes IN as the difference between the two. The device gets its name from the hemispherical metal strip that rotates around the detector and blocks the direct solar beam to yield a signal that is from the sky only (after the effect of the arm is included).
One of the first rotating shadowband devices was a broadband device introduced by Wesely (1982). A more advanced broadband instrument using a thermopile-type broadband pyranometer has been developed by Long et al. (1996). The multifrequency rotating shadowband radiometer (MFRSR), developed by Harrison et al. (1994), uses independent interference-filter-photodiode detectors and an automated rotating shadowband technique to make spatially resolved measurements at seven wavelength passbands. The MFRSR achieves an accuracy in direct-normal spectral irradiance comparable with that of narrowbeam tracking devices. A significant advantage of the shadowband technique is that the global and diffuse irradiance measurements can be used to study overall radiative budgets (Long 1996). Our FRSR makes use of the MFRSR detector head.
3. Instrument details
a. Hardware description
The complete radiation package, shown in Fig. 1, is an integration of five primary components (Fig. 3): 1) a broadband pyranometer, model PSP from The Eppley Laboratory, Inc.; 2) the FRSR, which is the subject of this paper; 3) an attitude sensor that measures platform pitch, roll, and azimuth; 4) a small, low-power data-control unit that performs the sweep-by-sweep processing algorithms; and 5) an uninterruptable power supply and backup battery module that eliminates power surges, minimizes power supply noise, and supports wind or solar power operation for remote operation. This paper concentrates on the operation of the FRSR and the specialized data processing that is required to derive accurate spectral decomposition of solar insolation.
The FRSR shadowband rotates continuously and moves across the upper hemisphere in 3.4 s. The hemispherical shape of the shadowband ensures that the sensor will see a shadow, regardless of its azimuth heading and at all but minimal solar elevations. Typically, the shadow moves across the face of the sun in a few tenths of a second, and the head is in full shadow for about one-tenth of a second.
The multispectral FRSR head is manufactured by Yankee Environmental Systems, Inc. It is a modified version of the comercially available MFRSR spectral radiometer head and has seven detectors (channels): a broadband channel and six 10-nm-wide bandpass-filtered channels at 415, 500, 660, 860, 870, and 940 nm. The head construction, adeptly described by Harrison et al. (1994), is environmentally sound, robust, and suitable for use in a marine environment. Figure 2 shows the Colina et al. (1996) reference solar spectrum at the top of the atmosphere and a typical spectrum for the earth’s surface. Superimposed on the graph are the FRSR pass bands, the silicone cell photodiode (called broadband here), and the six narrowband spectral channels. Passbands on the SeaWiFS satellite are shown for comparison.
The FRSR head is modified to decrease its electrical response time to about 1 ms. The response of the silicone cell detector is well below 1 ms, but the internal preamplifiers in the stock head have integrating low-noise amplifiers, that slow the overall response. The head response times are decreased by reducing their low-pass filter capacitors. This is accomplished easily, and laboratory tests do not show additional noise in the measurements.
b. Laboratory calibrations
Calibration is the most essential element of a radiation measurement program. Climate studies require insolation averages to a few watts per meters squared in absolute accuracy, and photometric studies require zero drift in the end-to-end calibration constants for reliable estimates of optical thickness. A thorough and on-going calibration process is required before the FRSR can make accurate photometric measurements at sea.
Laboratory calibration is done in two parts: the electronics and the optical head. The end-to-end electronic gains are carefully calibrated using the data collection software and a precision millivolt reference source in place of each radiometer channel. One-minute averages and standard deviations of voltages for each channel are logged for a full range of input voltages. The output voltage range is approximately 0–3000 mV and standard deviations are typically <1 mV over the entire range. Electronic calibrations are repeated at regular intervals and for a variety of ambient temperatures. Calibration of the electronics is performed before and after each deployment, and the gain equations are constant.
The FRSR radiometer head comes fully calibrated by the manufacturer in the form of three tables. First is a linear, direct-normal irradiance gain equation with units of mV (W m−2)−1 for the broadband channel and mV (W m−2 nm−1)−1 for the narrowband channels. These calibration equations are corrected for the individual bandpass spectral responses for the head. The second calibration product is the bandpass spectral response for each narrowband channel. This is the wi(λ) function in Eq. (11). Each of the narrowband filters has a bandwidth of approximately 10 nm, and the calibration provides gain figures at 1-nm spacing. Finally, zenith angle correction is measured on two planes, one on a south-to-north plane and one on a west-to-east plane. The zenith angle corrections are determined by holding the head in a tilting fixture under a collimated beam and tilting the head through 180° in 1° steps from horizon to horizon in each plane. Calibration tilt angles are θSNj and θWEj for j = 1, 2, . . . , 181. As an example, θSN1 = 90° in the south direction, θWE136 = 45° in the east direction, and so forth. A plot of the calibration zenith error corrections for the S–N and W–E planes are shown as a function of atmospheric mass in Fig. 4.
Calibration drift in the multifrequency head has caused a great deal of consternation to the sun photometer community. Calibration shift is detectable as a permanent change in I0 (or its voltage analog υ0) as computed by the Langley method. Calibration shift is erratic and quite variable; it can occur suddenly, over a few weeks, or can degrade slowly over months. The 610- and 660-nm channels are most prone to drift, though all narrowband channels are suspect. Researchers suspect that the gain drift is due to a shifting bandpass response. In earlier heads, the filter material, a stack of laminated films, apparently became delaminated as a result of temperature cycling and humidity. A different filter material became available after approximately December 1998 (Barr Associates; see their Web site: barrassociates.com/terms/temperature.html), and many researchers are in the process of retrofitting their heads with the new material. The filter material is also sensitive to temperature, and the shift in center frequency for any narrowband filter is approximately 10−5λ0ΔT. Thus, if the head temperature varies from 20° to 30°C, the 500-nm filter will drift by less than 1 nm (M. Beaubean, Yankee Environmental Systems, 1999, personal communication).
The MFRSR head is well insulated (thermal time constant ≈ 15 min) and has a 25-W heater circuit. A temperature regulation circuit easily maintained the head internal temperature at 35°C. An added benefit from heating is that condensation inside the head and on the diffuser is eliminated by the elevated temperature. The electronic amplifier circuits were carefully designed and tested from −20° to 65°C, and no significant temperature dependence was observed.
c. Installation and operation
The control data unit, shown in Fig. 3, is custom-made and packaged in a waterproof housing that resides in close proximity to the sensors. The complete datalogger package incorporates radio interference and surge protection, operates over a −40° to 65°C temperature range, and is waterproof and immune to shock and vibration. The low-level analog signals from the FRSR head are digitized with a high-speed 12-bit analog-to-digital converter circuit.
The installation location of the instrument on a ship must be carefully selected. Ideally, the FRSR should be mounted in an exposed location as high as possible and free of nuisance shadows from other objects. This is often difficult. Radiative flux measurements on a ship always need to consider errors from the ubiquitous masts and antennas. A ship’s communication antennas have highest vertical priority, as do the running lights, and one must be careful of radar beams, which can cause severe electronic noise.
Several external observations are necessary for data analysis. Accurate time, latitude, and longitude are needed to compute solar zenith and azimuth angles. To correct the sensor’s cosine response, one also needs the ship’s pitch, roll, and heading so the exact angle between the normal of the head and the solar beam can be derived. A pitch-roll-compass sensor is read twice during each cycle of the shadowband. A GPS receiver provides time, position, and magnetic variation each second.
The control data unit performs several functions during each shadowband cycle (Fig. 5). Broadband and housekeeping measurements are taken when the arm is at each horizon. During the sweep, when the shadowband crosses the upper hemisphere, 250 measurements are made for each channel. The first and last 10 samples of each sweep are averaged, and we refer to these measurements as the global measurements, υG1 and υG2. Global measurements are computed for each filter channel. To minimize electrical interference, the heater is operated only while the shadowband is below the horizon, and in cruises thus far, a constant head temperature of 35° ± 0.5°C is easily maintained.
Any sweep with κ ≥ 2.3 is block averaged and stored in a compressed binary packet. Block averaging of the sweep retains all of its significant shape characteristics but significantly reduces data storage requirements. Block averaging begins at the minimum index value, imin, and moves left and right through the sweep array with increasing block sizes. Twenty-three contiguous block averages, bij, where i is the channel number 1–7 and j is the bin number, are computed according to Table 1. The shadow index, imin, depends on the solar azimuth and zenith angles, the ship heading, and the pitch and roll, and thus can occur anywhere in the 250-point sweep array. In the block averaging process, some bins fall outside the sweep and are given a “missing” value.
The sweep data must be transmitted over long cables in noisy electronic environments, and therefore, standard packet conventions are used to ensure error-free communication. The compressed binary packet, with global and sweep data for all detectors, is transmitted as an EIA422, 19 200 bps, serial stream to the base computer. An EIA422 balanced-line transmission is highly immune to electronic noise and radio interference and can be transmitted over long transmission lines. The binary packet has start and end character strings and a cyclic redundancy checksum (CRC) for error-free transmission. Once the packets are transmitted, the shadowband cycle begins again.
4. Postprocessing
a. Sweep averaging
On a moving platform, some smoothing of the data is necessary. It was found that simple averages over a 2-min period (16 sweeps) would reduce the sampling uncertainty by a factor of approximately 4 and yield worst-case measurement uncertainties of about 5 W m−2 for the global values and less than 1 W m−2 for the shadow value. For perspective, 2 min is the approximate time for the sun to move by one diameter across the celestial sphere.
An example of the effectiveness of the 2-min averaging process is shown in Fig. 6, taken during the Aerosols99 cruise (discussed below). For this example the sun was high in the sky, and ship pitch and roll had a standard deviation of about 2°. (This amount of motion is typical for an 88-m ship in fair-weather ocean conditions.) When the detector was in full shadow, the standard deviations were extremely low and amounted to less than ±1 W m−2. During the time the detector was partially covered, the standard deviations were quite high due to the rapid transition and platform motion. When the detector was out of the shadow, standard deviations were small but were larger than the full-shadow case. Strict requirements are placed on the acceptability of any 2-min block. At least 14 sweeps must pass the shadow ratio criterion. Otherwise, that particular 2-min period is excluded from further analysis.
The diffuse component of total irradiance is insensitive to platform motion. Clouds alter the integrated diffuse irradiance on a timescale that is slow compared with the averaging times considered, as long as they do not block the direct beam. The minimal standard deviations in the shadow measurement in Fig. 6 are evidence to this fact.
The effectiveness of a 2-min averaging scheme was demonstrated by tests with an automated tilting table. During a cloud-free day, the tilting table was set to ±5° in pitch and roll and to a rocking period of 6.7 s, and it was turned on and off in half-hourly intervals. Figure 7 compares the individual sweep measurements to the averages. The black curve shows mean global voltages from individual sweeps, and the white line is the result from the 2-min averaging process.
b. Decomposing the solar signal
The shadowband theory [outlined in Eqs. (15) and (16)] must be modified for a moving platform when the head might not be on a horizontal plane. Three measurement quantities for each channel are computed from the 2-min mean voltages: the global signal
The calibration equation, (18), is used to compute IG, ID, IH, and IN from υG, υD, υH, and υN, respectively. From these terms, Eq. (13) can be used either for estimating the calibration constant I0 or for estimating τA.
5. Field deployments and Langley calibrations
Over the past three years, different models of the FRSR have been deployed on five ocean cruises. Early cruises allowed us an opportunity to watch system performance and make improvements to hardware and software as a continuing process. On 14 January 1999, the FRSR began a long voyage on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) ship R/V Ronald H. Brown, first from Norfolk, Virginia, to Cape Town, South Africa, and then to Mauritius and on to the Indian Ocean for the INDOEX cruise (Parsons and Dickerson 1999). Figure 8 shows the track of the cruise as the ship sailed across the Tropics then through the south Atlantic Ocean to Cape Town. The cruise trackline is marked by circles that show where the ship was at 1200 UTC each day. Gray circles indicate very cloudy days when no AOT data were available. The numbers adjacent to each circle mark the AOT at 610 nm that was estimated by the FRSR, and these can be compared to the contours. The trackline is superimposed on a composite of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) derived AOT at 630 nm for the cruise time period. The composite shows that over the course of the cruise, the ship encountered clean north Atlantic air followed by what appears to be Saharan dust then biomass burning from the central African continent and on into very clean south Atlantic air.
Details of this fascinating dataset will appear in future articles from the Aerosols99 team, but days 27–30 are shown here to demonstrate the performance of the FRSR at sea. During this time (Fig. 9), the AOTs changed dramatically as the ship left the continental plume and entered the South Atlantic clear air. Seas during this period were typical for the cruise; wave heights were estimated as 1–2 m and winds were 5–10 m s−1. The mean pitch and roll were of the order of 1°, and their standard deviations were 1°–2°. Figure 9 shows the AOTs at 500 and 862 nm that were measured during the day. When clouds of any kind block the solar disk, the AOT rises dramatically, and these extraneous points are also shown. The clear-beam AOT is readily apparent as an envelope marking the minimum of the computed AOTs. One can clearly see the decrease in AOT during this period. The strong decrease in the 500-nm AOTs compared to the 862-nm band is evidence that we were moving from denser, finer particles to the more uniform and larger sea-salt particles that dominate open ocean conditions.
Also shown on the AOT panels are measurements from three different handheld sun photometers. The MicroTops units were also calibrated after the cruise at Mauna Loa Observatory, and the data here incorporate the validated calibration coefficients. The three MicroTops photometers used for comparison here were from Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL, crosses), NOAA Atmospheric Resources Laboratory (ARL, circles), and NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL, triangles). The details of the MicroTops performance, calibration, and instrument-to-instrument scatter will be discussed in a separate paper, and they are used here for comparison to the FRSR. In general, the PMEL MicroTops did not perform well at 500 nm. There is no explanation for this since the MLO calibration showed no problems in this channel. Aside from that issue, the FRSR and MicroTops performed comparably. The exodus from the African plume is quite readily apparent in the FRSR data and not as discernable from the MicroTops.
During this period, we were able to get two good Langley days. Day 033 had a clear evening, and a second good opportunity for a midcruise Langley calibration check occurred on day 039 while the ship was tied to a pier in Cape Town. Langley plots for these three days are shown in Fig. 10. We had the most confidence in the channels at 415, 500, and 862 nm owing to filter drift problems discussed above, and these are shown in the plots.
After Cape Town, the FRSR was operated throughout the next four and a half months as the ship participated in experiments in the Indian Ocean. It was removed from its mast in Darwin in June, and in July 1999, it was taken to the NOAA Mauna Loa Observatory for calibration. Mauna Loa Observatory (Miller 1978) is at 3396 m altitude, well above the subtropical inversion, and removed from industrial sources of pollution or blown dust. Calibrations here are uncontaminated, and by taking measurements from a land-based site, platform motion is removed as a potential issue. Langley methods of calibration are sensitive to temporal variations of τA (Shaw 1983), and this is minimal at the isolated Mauna Loa site. The MLO is operated by the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL), where a large suite of long-term baseline instrumentation is operated.
Figure 11 shows results for day 219 (7 August 1999) during the Mauna Loa calibration. There is no question as to the quality of these conditions. In all Langley plots, the extrapolated intercepts, after being corrected for r2, agree almost perfectly, and we can conclude that for these channels, the solar constant term I0 was constant throughout the cruise.
As a cross-check on the accuracy of the factory calibrations, the measured values of I0 from the Langley method were compared to the top-of-the-atmosphere absolute flux, as measured by satellites and precision ground measurements. An absolute flux calibrated reference spectrum of the sun covering the 120–2500-nm range to an accuracy of 5% (Colina et al. 1996) was used in this comparison. The spectrum was corrected for the sun–earth distance and convolved with the bandpass response from the head calibration as described in (14). Table 2 shows the results.
6. Conclusions
The fast rotating shadowband spectral radiometer (FRSR) was developed for making long-term, routine, downwelling radiation measurements from moving platforms, such as ships. The design, described in this paper, and results from the Aerosols99 cruise across the Atlantic Ocean demonstrate the effectiveness of the FRSR for shipboard sun photometric measurements in the world’s oceans.
The diffuse irradiance ID(λ) is rarely measured at sea, and the ability to do this in an automated, routine manner will provide additional information on the composition of the measured aerosols. Diffuse irradiance and the ratio of the direct normal to diffuse irradiances are important climate parameters.
We have emphasized the importance of calibrations for FRSR measurements, which is the same as the land-based MFRSR and related instruments. A major difficulty for the oceanic instrument is that good “Langley days” occur so rarely at sea, owing to ubiquitous clouds on the horizon. A special effort to either identify those rare Langley days and also to maintain a schedule for instrument exchange and land calibration is essential. Oceanic conditions are generally much more clean and homogeneous than terrestrial sites. The Langley method makes an assumption of a stable and uniform atmosphere, and this is often questionable. With good calibration, one should be able to achieve 1% repeatability in I0, and while we have not achieved this in the current work, we can see that such a figure is acheivable.
During the next year, we expect to produce considerable field data from this and other FRSR systems presently under construction. We will be adapting the software, currently research oriented, into a reliable autonomous package that is suitable for a volunteer ship program. Extensive testing of the instrument using a pitch–roll table on land sites, at-sea intercomparisons, and long-term shipboard datasets is expected to set bounds on the usefulness of the FRSR in different ocean settings and platforms.
Acknowledgments
This development was accomplished with support from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Sensor Intercomparison and Merger for Biological Interdisciplinary Ocean Studies (SIMBIOS) program, Contract 52-210.91. The mechanical and electronic engineering were performed by Scott Smith and Ray Edwards of BNL. The officers and crew on the R/V Ronald H. Brown were completely supportive of our effort and went beyond expected duties to accommodate our installations. During the Aerosols99 cruise, we received considerable support and mentoring from scientists Tim Bates, Ken Voss, and Bruce Dodderidge. Chuck Long of Pennsylvania State University conceived the original idea for this modification to the classical shadowband instrument. Lee Harrison of SUNY–Albany provided helpful comments and suggestions. Tom Ackerman and Ted Cress of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory encouraged our work throughout. We also appreciate the efforts of Kendall Carder and Bob Stewart at the University of South Florida for helping us test the original prototype of this instrument aboard the R/V Bellows.
REFERENCES
Colina, L., R. C. Bohlin, and F. Castelli, 1996: The 0.12–2.5 μm absolute flux distribution of the sun for comparison with solar analog stars. Astron. J.,112, 307–315.
Davidson, J. A., C. A. Cantrell, A. H. McDaniel, R. E. Shetter, S. Madronich, and J. G. Calvert, 1988: Visible–ultraviolet absorption cross sections for NO2 as a function of temperature. J. Geophys. Res.,93 (D6), 7105–7112.
DOE, 1996: Science plan for the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM). Rep. DOE/ER-0670T, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, 50 pp.
Gueymard, C. A., 1998: Turbidity determination from broadband irradiance measurements: A detailed multicoefficient approach. J. Appl. Meteor.,37, 414–435.
Gurney, R. J., J. L. Foster, and C. L. Parkinson, 1993: Atlas of Satellite Observations Related to Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 470 pp.
Guzzi, R., G. C. Maracci, R. Rizzi, and A. Siccardi, 1985: Spectroradiometer for ground-based atmospheric measurements related to remote sensing in the visible from a satellite. Appl. Opt.,24, 2859–2864.
Harrison, L., and J. Michalsky, 1994: Objective algorithms for the retrieval of optical depths from ground-based measurements. Appl. Opt.,33, 5126–5132.
——, ——, and J. Berndt, 1994: Automated multifilter rotating shadow-band radiometer: An instrument for optical depth and radiation measurements. Appl. Opt.,33, 5126–5132.
Haywood, J. M., V. Ramaswamy, and B. J. Soden, 1999: Tropospheric aerosol climate forcing in clear-sky satellite observations over the oceans. Science,283, 1299–1303.
Holben, B. N., and Coauthors, 1998: AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Remote Sens. Environ.,66, 1–16.
Hooker, S. B., W. E. Esaias, G. C. Feldman, W. W. Gregg, and C. R. McLain, 1992: An Overview of SeaWiFS and Ocean Color. SeaWiFS Tech. Rep. Series, Vol. 1, Tech. Memo 104566, NASA, 24 pp.
Kasten, F., and A. T. Young, 1989: Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formula. Appl. Opt.,28, 4735–4738.
Kiehl, J. T., 1999: Solving the aerosol puzzle. Science,283, 1273–1275.
Liou, K.-N., 1980: An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation. Academic Press, 392 pp.
Long, C. N., 1996: Surface radiative energy budget and cloud forcing:Results from TOGA COARE and techniques for identifying and calculating clear sky irradiance. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 193 pp.
——, C. F. Pavloski, and T. P. Ackerman, 1996: A rotating shadow arm broadband solar radiometer: Instrument design and concept verification using ARM SGP radiometer measurements. Proc. Sixth Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Science Team Meeting, U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 200 pp.
Michalsky, J. J., 1988: The Astronomical Almanac’s algorithm for approximate solar position (1950–2050). Sol. Energy,41, 227–235.
Miller, J., Ed., 1978: Mauna Loa Observatory: A 20th Anniversary Report. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Paltridge, G. W., and C. M. R. Platt, 1977: Radiative processes in meteorology and climatology. Developments in Atmospheric Science, Elsevier.
Parsons, Capt. R. L., and R. R. Dickerson, 1999: NOAA Ship Ronald H. Brown study global climate variability. Sea Technol.,June, 39–45.
Penndorf, R., 1957: Tables of refractive index for standard air and the Rayleigh scattering coefficient for the spectral region between 0.2 and 20.0 μ and their application to atmospheric optics. J. Opt. Soc. Amer.,47, 176–182.
Schwartz, S. E., 1996: The Whitehouse effect—Shortwave radiative forcing of climate by anthropogenic aerosols: An overview. J. Aerosol Sci.,27, 359–382.
——, and M. O. Andreae, 1996: Uncertainty in climate change caused by aerosols. Science,272, 1121–1122.
Schwindling, M., P.-Y. Deschamps, and R. Frouin, 1998: Verification of aerosol models for satellite ocean color remote sensing. J. Geophys. Res.,103 (C11), 24 919–24 935.
Shaw, G. E., 1983: Sun photometry. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,64, 4–10.
Solar Light Company, 1996: User’s guide for the Microtops II Ozone and Sun Photometer. Rep. MTP03, Solar Light Co., 53 pp.
Spencer, J. W., 1989: Comments on The Astronomical Almanac’s algorithm for approximate solar position (1950–2050). Sol. Energy,42, 353.
Viollier, M., D. Tanré, and P.-Y. Deschamps, 1980: An algorithm for remote sensing of water color from space. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,18, 247–267.
Wagener, R., S. Nemesure, and S. E. Schwartz, 1997: Aerosol optical depth over oceans: High space- and time-resolution retrieval and error budget from satellite radiometry. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,14, 577–590.
Wesely, M. L., 1982: Simplified techniques to study components of solar radiation under haze and clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,21, 373–383.
Table of sweep block averaging bins, bij, i = 1, . . . , 23; j = 1, . . . , 6. The 23 bins and the number of points in each bin are shown. Bin 12 is the minimum (shadow) point
Table of comparisons of I0 from Langley plots from three different days. For the three filters shown, μ is the mean value, σ is the standard deviation relative to the reference value, and δ is the relative difference of the mean value from the weighted Colina et al. (1996) value