Rain Rate Estimates from Differential Polarization Measurements

M. Sachidananda Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, OK 73069

Search for other papers by M. Sachidananda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
D. S. Zrnić National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK 73069

Search for other papers by D. S. Zrnić in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the accuracy of rain rate estimates from data observed with a radar that has alternating horizontal and vertical polarization. Theoretical accuracies of rain rates from the reflectivity, the differential reflectivity and the differential propagation phase shift are considered via-a-vis the drop size distribution (DSD) variability, using a computer simulation procedure.

First measurements of the differential propagation phase shift have been provided by the National Severe Storms Laboratory's dual-polarized radar, in addition to the reflectivity and the differential reflectivity. An examination of the radar data has revealed factors that could affect the rain rate estimates to a greater extent than the often contended DSD variability in the case of differential reflectivity method. Errors caused by sidelobe contamination significantly affect the differential phase shift data, so that a large spatial scale averaging is required to obtain reasonably accurate rain rate estimates, thus limiting the spatial resolution possible.

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the accuracy of rain rate estimates from data observed with a radar that has alternating horizontal and vertical polarization. Theoretical accuracies of rain rates from the reflectivity, the differential reflectivity and the differential propagation phase shift are considered via-a-vis the drop size distribution (DSD) variability, using a computer simulation procedure.

First measurements of the differential propagation phase shift have been provided by the National Severe Storms Laboratory's dual-polarized radar, in addition to the reflectivity and the differential reflectivity. An examination of the radar data has revealed factors that could affect the rain rate estimates to a greater extent than the often contended DSD variability in the case of differential reflectivity method. Errors caused by sidelobe contamination significantly affect the differential phase shift data, so that a large spatial scale averaging is required to obtain reasonably accurate rain rate estimates, thus limiting the spatial resolution possible.

Save