Comparison of Two Methods for the Retrieval of Thermodynamic and Microphysical Variables from Doppler Radar Measurements: Application to the Case of a Tropical Squall Line

Danièle Hauser Centre de Recherches en Physique de l'Environnement Terrestre et Planetaire (CNET/CRPE), Issy les Moulineaux, France

Search for other papers by Danièle Hauser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frank Roux Centre de Recherches en Physique de l'Environnement Terrestre et Planetaire (CNET/CRPE), Issy les Moulineaux, France

Search for other papers by Frank Roux in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Paul Amayenc Centre de Recherches en Physique de l'Environnement Terrestre et Planetaire (CNET/CRPE), Issy les Moulineaux, France

Search for other papers by Paul Amayenc in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

Abstract

Microphysical and thermodynamic retrieval studies using a specified wind field can provide a means for analysing the different processes occurring within an observed precipitating system. Up to now, the retrieval of microphysical variable fields or thermodynamic fields have been performed separately, though the interest of associating both types of retrieval has been already noted by several authors.

The research reported here presents a new retrieval method allowing consistent and simultaneous derivation of the microphysical and thermodynamic variable fields using the whole set of governing equations (momentum, thermodynamic, and microphysical equations) with the wind field specified from Doppler radar observations. The microphysical retrieval makes use of the continuity equation for the total water substance and for the precipitating substance. Two types of precipitating particles are considered (rain and graupel), and a parameterization derived from that proposed by Kessler is chosen. In practice, the microphysical retrieval is coupled to the retrieval of thermodynamic variables, which is derived from Roux. A more classical approach taking into account the thermodynamic equation and the microphysical equations, but not the momentum equation is also used for comparison.

Results obtained from both approaches in the convective region of a tropical squall line observed during COPT81 (22 June 1981) are presented and discussed. It is found that both approaches provide results in mutual agreement, and which are consistent with the observed reflectivity structure, and with surface measurements. The respective advantages and drawbacks of each approach are also discussed.

Abstract

Microphysical and thermodynamic retrieval studies using a specified wind field can provide a means for analysing the different processes occurring within an observed precipitating system. Up to now, the retrieval of microphysical variable fields or thermodynamic fields have been performed separately, though the interest of associating both types of retrieval has been already noted by several authors.

The research reported here presents a new retrieval method allowing consistent and simultaneous derivation of the microphysical and thermodynamic variable fields using the whole set of governing equations (momentum, thermodynamic, and microphysical equations) with the wind field specified from Doppler radar observations. The microphysical retrieval makes use of the continuity equation for the total water substance and for the precipitating substance. Two types of precipitating particles are considered (rain and graupel), and a parameterization derived from that proposed by Kessler is chosen. In practice, the microphysical retrieval is coupled to the retrieval of thermodynamic variables, which is derived from Roux. A more classical approach taking into account the thermodynamic equation and the microphysical equations, but not the momentum equation is also used for comparison.

Results obtained from both approaches in the convective region of a tropical squall line observed during COPT81 (22 June 1981) are presented and discussed. It is found that both approaches provide results in mutual agreement, and which are consistent with the observed reflectivity structure, and with surface measurements. The respective advantages and drawbacks of each approach are also discussed.

Save