EDITORIAL

Joe Klemp
Search for other papers by Joe Klemp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Full access

In January of 2001 the average production time—that is, the average time required for an accepted manuscript to appear in print after its receipt at AMS Headquarters—for AMS journals was over eight months. This was clearly unacceptable to authors, editors, and the Society as a whole. Production times had grown worse over a several-year period as the journals grew faster than the staffing at Headquarters did and a serious backlog developed.

Strategic staffing increases, starting in 2000 but continuing through 2001, of technical and copy editors and editorial assistants, as well as a streamlining of the editing procedures, began the process of reducing the backlog while maintaining a high level of editorial quality and, hence, improving the production times. The press used by the Society, Allen Press, also committed to improvements in their part of the production process. The result is that by January 2002, several of the journals had reached the target goal of 150-day production time and the average for the aggregate of the journals was 156 days for the issues published that month. The staff took advantage of opportunities as they arose to have some journals reach the 150-day goal sooner than others, but the commitment on the part of Headquarters staff is that each of the journals will have production times at or below 150 days as soon as possible and continuing into the future.

Below you will find two figures. Figure 1 is the production time for the Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (JAS) from January 2001 to February 2002 (the last month for which issue data were available when this issue went to press). Figure 2 shows the same information for all journals. The improvement is dramatic. Authors can now have confidence that their papers will be published with all due speed and accuracy in AMS journals.

I congratulate the Publications Department staff at AMS Headquarters for aggressively addressing this issue and bringing production time down to the target level.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Avg mean production time (days) Jan 2001–Feb 2002 for JAS.

Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 59, 11; 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1777:E>2.0.CO;2

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Avg mean production time for all journals (days) Jan 2001–Feb 2002.

Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 59, 11; 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1777:E>2.0.CO;2

Save
  • Fig. 1.

    Avg mean production time (days) Jan 2001–Feb 2002 for JAS.

  • Fig. 2.

    Avg mean production time for all journals (days) Jan 2001–Feb 2002.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 155 16 0
PDF Downloads 16 12 0