1. Introduction
During the last decade there has been an increasing intensity of research on the hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles and on their activation to cloud droplets. This interest was driven by the need to increase our knowledge about the interaction of atmospheric aerosol particles with water vapor in the atmosphere. This is important with respect to two different aspects. First, this interaction determines the size of the particles at the relative humidities prevailing in the atmosphere and thus their direct effect on climate. Second, it also influences cloud properties by determining the concentration of cloud droplets, and with this cloud albedo and cloud lifetime (Twomey 1974; Albrecht 1989). Accordingly, research on hygroscopic growth and activation of atmospheric aerosol particles is needed to gain a better understanding of the earth’s climate and of anthropogenic influences on climate change, processes in which clouds still present the single largest uncertainty (Forster et al. 2007).
Both hygroscopic growth and activation of atmospheric aerosol particles can be described by the Köhler equation, which connects the water vapor saturation above the surface of a droplet Sd to the droplet diameter dd. The Raoult term, also known as the water activity aw, accounts for a lowering of Sd due to soluble substance in the droplet. It approaches a value of 1 with increasing wet droplet size (for a fixed dry diameter of the aerosol particle) because of the increasing dilution of the solution. The Kelvin term describes the increase of Sd due to the curvature of the droplet. It approaches a value of 1 with increasing droplet size, as the curvature decreases.
Many attempts have been made to derive the critical supersaturation for the activation of particles from their measured hygroscopic growth using Köhler theory, subsequently comparing the modeled and measured critical supersaturations. This constitutes a closure study for cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Agreement between measured and modeled critical supersaturations increases the confidence in our understanding of the processes underlying the hygroscopic growth and activation.
CCN closure studies were done for both laboratory generated aerosol particles (e.g., Brechtel and Kreidenweis 2000a, b; Kreidenweis et al. 2005; Koehler et al. 2006; Svenningsson et al. 2006; Dinar et al. 2006b; Wex et al. 2007, hereafter WH07; Prenni et al. 2007) and atmospheric aerosol particles (e.g., Covert et al. 1998; Zhou et al. 2001; Dusek et al. 2003; Rissler et al. 2004; Ervens et al. 2007). In general, these closure studies were more often successful when particles were examined that consisted of well-known and understood (usually inorganic) substances (e.g., ammonium sulfate or sodium chloride), in contrast to the results obtained for less well-known (usually organic) substances [e.g., dicarboxylic acids, humic-like substances (HULIS), or secondary organic aerosols (SOAs)], mixtures of these, or atmospheric particles.
In laboratory studies introduced by Kreidenweis et al. (2005) and Svenningsson et al. (2006), reasons for the failure to achieve closure were ascribed to a possible existence of slightly soluble substances. Because hygroscopic growth often can only be measured up to 95% relative humidity (RH), a possible change in dissociation with concentration or a decrease of the degree of nonideal behavior of the dissolved substances toward the more dilute solutions at higher RHs would not be detected by these hygroscopic growth measurements.
In summarizing CCN closure studies done for atmospheric aerosol, it was found that those studies that were able to achieve closure were generally not influenced by strong anthropogenic sources and had low concentrations of organic carbon in the aerosol phase (Broekhuizen et al. 2006). For studies that did not achieve closure, the discrepancy has generally been attributed to an incomplete understanding of the aerosol composition, especially the role of organic species (Stroud et al. 2007). Chang et al. (2007) compared measured CCN number concentrations with those derived with Köhler theory, using aerosol compositions obtained from aerosol mass spectrometer measurements as input. They found that during periods when the aerosol organic content is high, the predicted CCN number concentration was significantly lower than the measured one, and they identify surface tension and the unknown degree of internal mixing as possible reasons for this.
An increasing number of studies have focused on the surface tension of organic compounds and its influence on hygroscopic growth and activation. Facchini et al. (1999, 2000 described a reduction of the surface tension in atmospheric cloud and fog water samples and attributed it to polycarboxylic acids (which have molecular structures similar to HULIS) and to a lesser extent to mono- and dicarboxylic acids. It was estimated in Facchini et al. (1999) that surface tension lowering due to organic compounds has a potential effect on the earth’s radiation budget comparable to that of droplet growth kinetics, solubility, and water-soluble gases.
Sorjamaa et al. (2004) and Sorjamaa and Laaksonen (2006) pointed out that surface active substances enrich at the particle/droplet surface and that an attributed change in the Raoult term also has to be accounted for.
In laboratory studies on particles as internal mixtures of certain inorganic and organic compounds, Henning et al. (2005) and Svenningsson et al. (2006) measured a surface tension lowering for the mixtures. Using these measured values in model calculations led to a good agreement between measured and modeled activation behavior for solution droplets in Henning et al. (2005). However, Svenningsson et al. (2006) stated that the modeled activation was very sensitive to the extrapolation of surface tension data from those concentrations where it was measured to those relevant during activation.
For atmospheric HULIS samples, surface tensions down to below 50 mN m−1 were measured (Kiss et al. 2005; Salma et al. 2006; Taraniuk et al. 2007), which is substantially lower than the value for water, 72.8 mN m−1 (at 20°C). However, these measurements were carried out in concentration ranges of up to 1 g L−1—which is about two to three orders of magnitude below those of HULIS particles that had grown to their equilibrium sizes at RHs ranging from 60% to 99%, and about a factor of 20 to 100 below those of HULIS particles that are just activating.
Aerosol components have lower concentrations in rain and fog droplets than they have in hygroscopically grown or freshly activated particles/droplets, and therefore the measurements of surface tension on rain and fog water samples (e.g., Facchini et al. 2000) also give surface tension values that may be different from those that prevail during hygroscopic growth or activation.
In addition, measurements show that the reduction in surface tension builds up with time (Salma et al. 2006; Taraniuk et al. 2007). The time scales reported there for bulk solutions or large droplets (with sizes larger than several 100 μm) are on the order of seconds to minutes. But the process of activation proceeds on time scales that are much shorter. However, estimations proposed in Taraniuk et al. (2007) suggested that in the case of HULIS, the diffusion to the surface of a evolving droplet is sufficiently rapid to influence its surface tension, and with this the activation process.
Measurements on HULIS particles were done in Dinar et al. (2006b), WH07, and Ziese et al. (2008, hereafter ZW08), and a surface tension lowering had to be taken into account in these studies to accurately model the measured activation. However, the surface tension values that were needed to explain the measurements in WH07 and ZW08 were between 60 and 70 mN m−1, whereas 50 mN m−1 had been measured for a HULIS bulk solution.
Overall, the surface tension of aerosol particles that are at their equilibrium diameters or that are just activating cannot be assessed experimentally with up-to-date methods. However, as this work will show, the surface tension does influence the activation of aerosol particles and thus will be important to account for when modeling the activation of aerosol particles to cloud droplets.
With respect to increasing our understanding of warm cloud droplet activation, McFiggans et al. (2006) generally outlined the effects of different physical and chemical aerosol properties on activation. With the study presented here, we give a comprehensive set of data on the sensitivity of the Köhler equation. We examine separately the sensitivity of the two parts of the Köhler equation, the Raoult and the Kelvin terms. For this, values of parameters of the Köhler equation—namely, those parameters that describe the soluble substance in a particle/droplet and the surface tension σs of the droplet solution—are varied separately. This is done for two model substances, one more and one less hygroscopic, and for a range of dry particle sizes from 50 to 125 nm. In this first step, constant values were used for σs, independent of the concentration.
An example of the effect of using σ of water versus a concentration-dependent surface tension is given afterward. In addition, we explore the sensitivity to a recent representation of the partitioning of solvent molecules between the surface of a particle and the bulk interior. The aim is to determine the importance of different parameters in the Köhler equation and to get insight into possible explanations as to why CCN closure studies may or may not succeed.
2. Köhler model








In both Eqs. (3) and (4), ϕ and ν sometimes are combined to produce a so-called van’t Hoff factor i, which is then often used as a constant value over the whole range of different concentrations of the solute.






In the following, the sensitivity of the Köhler equation on variations in either σs (i.e., in K) or in Nion (i.e., in aw) will be derived and examined. The variations can be interpreted as uncertainties in the respective parameters, and the magnitude of the assumed variations (i.e., uncertainties) will be given in the next section.
3. The model compounds
This study examines the sensitivity of the Köhler equation for two different model compounds (i.e., for two different types of substances), one being more and one less hygroscopic. The substances chosen as the according model substances were ammonium sulfate and HULIS. The values which were used for the different particle properties are given in Table 1.
Ammonium sulfate is a well understood and abundantly occurring hydrophilic inorganic component of the atmospheric aerosol. It is known to show nonideal behavior. The upper panel of Fig. 1 shows ϕ for ammonium sulfate (Pruppacher and Klett 1997) and also, as a dotted line, the value that corresponds to a constant i of 2.2 (using ν = 3). In the lower panel of Fig. 1, the deviation [(i − ϕ)/ϕ] is given as a percentage.
In this study, Eq. (3) was used to determine aw; in calculations for ammonium sulfate, the variation of ϕ was accounted for following Pruppacher and Klett (1997), as shown in Fig. 1. Calculations done for this study were compared to those from a more elaborate model (Topping et al. 2005a, b, 2007) for ammonium sulfate. Figure 2 shows the good agreement between these two formulations, with differences in the subsaturated regime being <2.5 nm at any saturation. The critical supersaturations for the two formulations are 0.43% and 0.45% for the model by Topping et al. (2007) and the one used here, respectively.
Values of the properties of the second model substance were chosen according to those found for HULIS in WH07. HULIS is a generic term for large organic molecules found in the atmospheric aerosol. HULIS shows a lower hygroscopicity than ammonium sulfate and is less well understood. HULIS sampled and extracted from different atmospheric aerosol samples worldwide shows a span in values determined for its properties: reported molecular weight ranges from 200 to 700 atomic mass units (amu) (Kiss et al. 2003; Dinar et al. 2006b; Samburova et al. 2005), and density values between 1.5 and 1.7 g cm−3 were given (Hoffer et al. 2006; Dinar et al. 2006a). The values for the HULIS properties used here are within the range of values reported in literature. Because of a general lack of knowledge about HULIS (and in contrast to the treatment of ammonium sulfate), ideal behavior and no dissociation of the molecules in solution were assumed. It has to be added that HULIS has an influence on hygroscopic growth and activation of atmospheric aerosols not only through its hygroscopic behavior but also through a possible influence on σs. Equilibrium values for σs as low as 50 mN m−1 have been measured (Salma et al. 2006; Kiss et al. 2005; Taraniuk et al. 2007). However, the influence of HULIS on the σs of an activating droplet is still under scientific debate (e.g., Kokkola et al. 2006; WH07; ZW08).
Of the parameters determining K, σs is the one whose value is the most difficult to determine. For aw, the parameters whose values can be difficult to determine are those describing the soluble substance, especially when less well characterized substances or mixtures (as in the case of atmospheric aerosols) are to be dealt with. In Eq. (7), all these parameters were combined into Nion. Overall, for the sensitivity study presented here, σs and Nion—the former determining K; that latter being important for aw—were the parameters that were varied.
For σs, values between that of water (72.8 mN m−1; Low 1969) and a value 30% lower (51 mN m−1) were considered. This is within the range that was measured for atmospheric HULIS, as cited above. To obtain a general idea of the sensitivity to a variation of σs, this variation was examined for both model compounds. The surface tension of a droplet can also depend on the concentration of the dissolved substance, as already described by Szyszkowski (1908). ZW08 found a concentration-dependent surface tension for HULIS particles from a combination of measurements and model calculations (see Fig. 3). The concentration range that roughly limits the activation regime for the HULIS particles is indicated as a hatched area in Fig. 3. Stars in Fig. 3 indicate the surface tensions at which particles with dry diameters of 50, 75, 100, and 125 nm activate. In Fig. 3, all of the indicated surface tensions relevant for activation are above 60 mN m−1. A lowering of σs up to 30% indicates the larger end of a possible shift in σs. The sensitivities derived in this work relate to a 1% shift in the examined parameter, and a maximum variation of 30% was chosen to cover the whole range of experimentally observed values. The sensitivities of the Köhler equation that will be derived in the following sections will subsequently be applied to the two HULIS samples introduced in Fig. 3, including the concentration-dependent treatment of σs.


4. Variations
When looking at Eqs. (2) and (3) for the Kelvin term and the Raoult term, respectively, it can be seen that the Raoult term is dominant for smaller dd whereas the Kelvin term is the dominant term at larger values of dd, with both terms acting in opposite directions. This is due to the −d−3d versus the d−1d dependency of the Raoult and Kelvin term, respectively. The maximum in the Köhler curve denotes the critical size and critical supersaturation Scrit (Scrit = Sd − 1) at which a particle activates to become a cloud droplet. Figure 4 shows Köhler curves for a dry particle size of 50 nm for the two model substances. To obtain these curves, K and aw were determined for different values of σs and Nion varying around the values given in Table 1. Both a change in aw with constant K and a change in K with constant aw produce different Köhler curves with different maxima (i.e., with different Scrit) but also with different values for dd at any fixed saturation. Comparing the left and right panels of Fig. 4, it can be seen already that a variation in σs gives rise to larger changes in Scrit than an equally large variation in Nion. The opposite occurs when looking at dd.
The curves in Fig. 5 show values of dd at fixed saturations for different variations of Nion (top) or σs (bottom). The values in Fig. 5 were taken from the curves of the less hygroscopic compound as given in the left panel of Fig. 4. The slope of each of the curves in Fig. 5 is equal to the derivative of dd with respect to Nion or σs. The slope of the curves increases for increasing saturations, indicating that the sensitivity of dd to changes in Nion and σs increases toward larger saturations.
A change of Scrit with respect to a variation in either σs or in Nion is shown in Fig. 6. Again, the slopes of the two curves in Fig. 6 indicate the derivatives of Scrit with respect to Nion or σs. A larger dependence of Scrit on σs than on Nion can be seen.
5. Sensitivities
Figures 5 and 6 show results for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm for the less hygroscopic model substances only. The slopes of the curves shown in Figs. 5 and 6 give the sensitivity of dd or Scrit on Nion or σs. Sensitivities were determined for both model substances for data on dry diameters of 50, 75, 100, and 125 nm. The compiled results are shown in Fig. 7. The gradients of the curves for a lowering of σs compared to a lowering of Nion were opposite. Therefore, to facilitate a comparison of the results, Fig. 7 gives the absolute values of the derived sensitivities. These values are given separately in different panels for the different dry diameters. Each panel shows values for both model substances. The sensitivities are given depending on the saturation and, as separate points, for Scrit.




A striking feature of Fig. 7 is the similarity of the shape of the curves in the different panels. Looking at the hygroscopic growth regime, the sensitivity of dd increases in general toward larger saturations. Also within the hygroscopic growth regime and for all dry diameters, the more hygroscopic substance is in general more sensitive than the less hygroscopic substance. This is different for the sensitivity of Scrit to either σs or Nion, which is larger for the less hygroscopic substance than for the more hygroscopic one. For both substances and at all dry diameters, the hygroscopic growth up to a saturation of 0.99 is more sensitive to Nion than to σs. This is different at saturations above 0.99 and at Scrit, where the sensitivity to σs exceeds that to Nion. Indeed, the sensitivity to σs is very low for saturations below 0.95 and increases rapidly above that saturation, being about twice as much than that to Nion at activation.
In addition to the described similarities for the different dry diameters, there are also differences. These are the absolute values of the sensitivities, which differ in the different panels. For an increasing dry diameter, the same variation in either σs or Nion causes a larger shift in dd than in Scrit.
Summarizing, the following most important conclusions can be drawn from the sensitivities depicted in Fig. 7:
(i) the hygroscopic growth regime (i.e., dd) is more sensitive to variations of Nion than to variations in σs;
(ii) whereas the hygroscopic growth below saturations of 0.95 is almost insensitive to σs, its sensitivity to σs becomes important at larger saturations;
(iii) Scrit is about twice as sensitive to a variation of σs than to a similar variation of Nion;
(iv) in the hygroscopic growth regime, the more hygroscopic substance is more sensitive than the less hygroscopic one, with an increasing sensitivity toward larger dry diameters; and
(v) Scrit of less hygroscopic substances is more sensitive than that of the more hygroscopic ones, with an increasing sensitivity toward lower dry diameters.
6. Cases with concentration-dependent σs
The main result from the examinations described above is that the sensitivity to σs is very low for saturations below 0.95, whereas Scrit is more sensitive to a variation in σs than to a variation of the same magnitude in Nion.
This result was obtained by using a constant value of σs. However, σs may depend on the concentration of the solution (Szyszkowski 1908; ZW08). In the following, results from the Köhler equation using σs as given in Fig. 3 are compared to those using the value of σ for water. In the calculations, Nion is taken from values given in Table 1.
The upper panel of Fig. 8 shows the modeled hygroscopic growth of HULIS particles, first using the σ of water (water case) and then using values for σs as given in Fig. 3 (HULIS1 and HULIS2, based on a parameterization of measurements done by ZW08). Calculations were done for ddry = 100 nm. The lower panel of Fig. 3 gives the difference between either HULIS1 or HULIS2 and the measured equilibrium diameter of the water case. This difference amounts to less than 5 nm over the whole range up to 99.5% RH when using the σs of HULIS1, whereas it is below 5 nm for up to 98% RH and rises to 12 nm at 99.5% RH for the σs of HULIS2. This difference decreases for smaller ddry (see sensitivities in Fig. 7) and can be considered small.
Figure 9 gives values of Scrit calculated for the same conditions as above for a ddry of 50, 75, 100, and 125 nm, respectively. For 50-nm particles, the difference in Scrit between the water case and HULIS1 is 0.1%; it is 0.2% (absolute in S) between the water case and HULIS2. As shown above, the influence of σs on Scrit decreases (in absolute numbers) as ddry increases. Figures 8 and 9 show that σs does have an influence on Scrit, but it hardly influences hygroscopic growth. It also becomes clear that this influence of σs on Scrit is mainly important for particles with small ddry in the range below 100 nm.
From the sensitivities given in Fig. 7 it follows that for ddry of 50 nm a variation of 1% in σs was found to causes a shift in Scrit of 0.0145% (absolute in S) for the less hygroscopic substance. Figure 3 gives σs values of 68 and 64 mN m−1 for HULIS1 and HULIS2, respectively, at the point of activation for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm [i.e., a shift toward the σ of water of 5 mN m−1 (or 7%) and 9 mN m−1 (or 12%)]. Thus, from the sensitivity of σs to Scrit there follows a shift in Scrit of 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively. These shifts are similar to those derived from calculations with the Köhler equation and a concentration-dependent σs. This corroborates the possibility of using the sensitivities derived in section 5 (Fig. 7) to derive deviations in dd or Scrit caused by deviations in Nion or σs.
7. Considerations for the inclusion of partitioning








A solution to the Gibbs adsorption equation [Eq. (12)] was found by varying the concentration of solute molecules in the bulk using the numerical technique as described by Sorjamaa and Laaksonen (2006). To use this method and reduce our unknowns down to one, we first assumed that the surface excess of water is zero, following Li et al. (1998). The gradient of surface tension is found by employing the Szyskowski equation, and activity gradients were calculated using the original universal functional activity coefficient (UNIFAC) framework and the parameters of Hansen et al. (1991).
Before the subsequent differences between the results for cases considering and omitting partitioning are analyzed, Fig. 10 shows the variation in the calculated surface excess concentration for fulvic acid as a function of wet size for particles with an initial dry diameter of 100 and 200 nm. Also shown are the surface tensions that result for the cases in which partitioning was and was not taken into account. The excess values for the case omitting partitioning equal the values of the concentrated partitioning case, and the change in σs for the nonpartitioning case only originates in the change in the droplet solution concentration.
What is the impact of the above on the associated Köhler curves? Figure 11 shows the predicted Köhler curves for both a partitioning and nonpartitioning case study for both a 100- and a 200-nm dry diameter particle. The surface tension is also plotted. This figure clearly shows that consideration of bulk to surface partitioning increases the critical saturation ratio. This increase has to be attributed to both the increase in σs and the change in the amount of soluble substance in solution. For the particles with a dry diameter with 100 nm, the values of Scrit for the partitioning and the nonpartitioning case are 0.38% and 0.27%, whereas σs at the point of activation is 56 and 46 mN m−1, respectively (see Fig. 11). This is a difference of 19% between the values for σs for the two cases. When looking at the results presented in Fig. 7, this increase in σs would be expected to amount to an increase in Scrit of 0.099% (absolute)—a 0.0052% change in Scrit per 1% change in σs for a 100-nm particle of the less soluble substance. Thus, the increase in Scrit between the partitioning and the nonpartitioning case is slightly larger (0.11% absolute) than one that would originate only from a change of σs because of the additional change in the amount of soluble substance in solution. However, the change in σs explains most of the increase of Scrit between the partitioning and the nonpartitioning case.
This shows that partitioning changes both the σs of the droplets and the solution concentration, with σs being the more influential parameter.
8. Consequences
The above demonstrated sensitivities of dd and of Scrit on variations in Nion and σs have some practical consequences.
Deriving Scrit from measurements of the hygroscopic growth is only possible if the examined substance has no influence on σs. Information about σs simply cannot be drawn from measurements on the hygroscopic growth because hygroscopic growth (i.e., dd) is not sensitive to σs, especially at saturations below 0.95. Fitting the Köhler equation to measurements of the hygroscopic growth and deriving Scrit from this fitted equation will lead to wrong values of Scrit if the wrong σs is used. Obtaining a correct value for σs, however, and correctly describing possible influences of partitioning (which also can effect Scrit) are both difficult.
The sensitivity of Scrit to σs and to the correct description of partitioning increases as the particle size decreases and is especially important in the diameter range below 100 nm. A 10% shift in σs (from 72.8 to 65.5 mN m−1) causes a decrease in Scrit for the less hygroscopic substance of about 0.15%, 0.08%, and 0.05% for particles with dry diameters of 50, 75, and 100 nm, respectively, the shift for the latter being at about the measurement accuracy for measurements of Scrit. Whereas for the larger particles the sensitivity of Scrit to σs cannot be resolved by up-to-date measurement techniques, this sensitivity is important and can be resolved for particles below 100 nm, the size range at which atmospheric aerosol particles under atmospheric conditions do or do not activate (Dusek et al. 2006). Thus, omitting an effect of particle chemical composition on σs can lead to erroneous predictions of the particle activation behavior.
A simple sensitivity study was performed, estimating the change in the number of activated droplets (Nact) for a 10% change in σs from 72.8 to 65.5 mN m−1. The estimates were based on atmospheric aerosol number size distributions measured at an urban location during the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization Experiment (LACE 98; Wex et al. 2002) and at a rural background station [the Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research (IfT), Leipzig, Germany; Tuch et al. 2003]; see Fig. 12. The data taken from LACE 98 had been measured with a time resolution of 15 min and were averaged over 1 day for each of the two distributions used in this study. Data taken from Tuch et al. (2003) were average number size distributions measured on working days in winter over several years (1997–2001).


Two extreme cases were considered in which all particles were assumed to be chemically equal to either the more or the less hygroscopic substance used in this study, respectively. Also, two dry particle sizes were considered; that is, the supersaturations were chosen such that for σs = 72.8 mN m−1, dcrit was 125 nm in one case and 50 nm in the second case. The examined lowering of σs caused a lowering of dcrit from 125 to 112.5 nm and from 50 to 45 nm, independent of the substance.
The value of F for the three different number size distributions was found to be about 21% at the larger dcrit and about 10% for the lower dcrit. This implies that, independent of the chemical composition of the particles, an influence of the chemical composition on the surface tension has to be accounted for to derive the correct numbers of activated particles.
Values for F derived here exceed a comparable estimation made by Facchini et al. (1999), where a simplified relationship between the number of cloud droplets N and Scrit was used (N ∝ S0.5crit). Facchini et al. (1999) concluded that a 30% decrease in σs results in a 20% increase in N. The stronger effect found in our work arises from the fact that measured number size distributions were used instead of an approximation, and our results hint to an even larger effect of surface tension reduction on N. This should be tested by implementing the sensitivities derived in this study with cloud parcel models, a task that is beyond the scope of the study presented here.
9. Conclusions
In this study, the sensitivity of hygroscopic growth and activation as modeled with the Köhler equation was examined. Values of the parameters which are used in the Köhler equation were varied to simulate an uncertainty in these values. The extent of the variations was chosen according to the range of uncertainties which exist for the respective parameters in up-to-date knowledge—that is, uncertainties in the surface tension σs, which was varied from 72.8 mN m−1 (water) down to 51 mN m−1 (following values reported in literature, e.g., Facchini et al. 1999; Salma et al. 2006; Kiss et al. 2005), and uncertainties which may arise from ideal treatment of nonideal solutions, a lack of knowledge of the density and molecular weight of the substances dissolved in a droplet, or uncertainties in the dry particle diameter. The examined dry particle sizes were in the range in which atmospheric particles may activate (i.e., from 50 to 125 nm).
It was found that the examined variations cause significant changes in both hygroscopic growth and activation. The major insight is that although the hygroscopic growth regime below 95% RH is insensitive toward σs, nonetheless σs has a large influence on the activation, and increasingly so for decreasing particle size.
When taking into account a change in σs with droplet concentration, the sensitivities derived in this work were shown to be applicable to deriving the change in activation due to the change in σs. However, it also became obvious that knowledge of the value of σs at the point of activation is important.
This was found again when taking into account partitioning of the surface active compound in the particle. For this case, the changing droplet concentration also influences the activation, but to a smaller extend. However, partitioning is important to account for because it influences σs, yielding values of σs that are above those that are obtained when omitting partitioning.
The dependence of the activation on σs implies that a CCN closure, connecting particle hygroscopic growth to activation, cannot be successful if the examined substance has an influence on σs that is ignored, especially for smaller particles in the size range from 50 to 100 nm, which is important for cloud droplet activation in the atmosphere.
Based on measured atmospheric particle number size distributions, it was estimated that a lowering of σs by only 10% causes a change in the activated fraction (i.e., in the cloud droplet number concentration) of 10% to 20%. This change is large enough to cause a noticeable influence on the radiation budget of a corresponding cloud, leading to erroneous estimates of cloud radiation budgets.
It becomes obvious that the surface tension is an important factor when determining the activation of aerosol particles to cloud droplets. Examining the effective surface tensions of growing particles/droplets during the activation process is an important field in which research will have to be performed in the future.
REFERENCES
Albrecht, B. A., 1989: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science, 245 , 1227–1230.
Brechtel, F. J., and S. M. Kreidenweis, 2000a: Predicting particle critical supersaturation from hygroscopic growth measurements in the humidified TDMA. Part I: Theory and sensitivity studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 57 , 1854–1871.
Brechtel, F. J., and S. M. Kreidenweis, 2000b: Predicting particle critical supersaturation from hygroscopic growth measurements in the humidified TDMA. Part II: Laboratory and ambient studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 57 , 1872–1887.
Broekhuizen, K., R. Y-W. Chang, W. R. Leaitch, S-M. Li, and J. P. D. Abbatt, 2006: Closure between measured and modeled cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) using size-resolved aerosol composition in downtown Toronto. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 2513–2524.
Chang, R. Y-W., P. S. K. Liu, W. R. Leaitch, and J. P. D. Abbatt, 2007: Comparison between measured and predicted CCN concentrations at Egbert, Ontario: Focus on the organic aerosol fraction at a semi-rural site. Atmos. Environ., 41 , 8172–8182.
Covert, D. S., J. L. Gras, A. Wiedensohler, and F. Stratmann, 1998: Comparison of directly measured CCN with CCN modeled from the number-size distribution in the marine boundary layer during ACE 1 at Cape Grim, Tasmania. J. Geophys. Res., 103 , 16597–16608.
Dinar, E., T. F. Mentel, and Y. Rudich, 2006a: The density of humic acids and humic like substances (HULIS) from fresh and aged wood burning and pollution aerosol particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 5213–5224.
Dinar, E., I. Taraniuk, E. R. Graber, S. Katsman, T. Moise, T. Anttila, T. F. Mentel, and Y. Rudich, 2006b: Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 2465–2481.
Dusek, U., D. S. Covert, A. Wiedensohler, C. Neusüβ, D. Weise, and W. Chantrell, 2003: Cloud condensation nuclei spectra derived from size distributions and hygroscopic properties of the aerosol in coastal southwest Portugal during ACE-2. Tellus, 55B , 35–53.
Dusek, U., and Coauthors, 2006: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles. Science, 312 , 1375–1378.
Ervens, B., M. Cubison, E. Andrews, G. Feingold, J. A. Ogren, J. L. Jimenez, P. DeCarlo, and A. Nenes, 2007: Prediction of cloud condensation nucleus number concentration using measurements of aerosol size distributions and composition and light scattering enhancement due to humidity. J. Geophys. Res., 112 .D10S32, doi:10.1029/2006JD007426.
Facchini, M., M. Mircea, S. Fuzzi, and R. J. Charlson, 1999: Cloud albedo enhancement by surface-active organic solutes in growing droplets. Nature, 401 , 257–259.
Facchini, M., S. Decesari, M. Mircea, S. Fuzzi, and G. Loglio, 2000: Surface tension of atmospheric wet aerosol and cloud/fog droplets in relation to their organic carbon content and chemical composition. Atmos. Environ., 34 , 4853–4857.
Forster, P., and Coauthors, 2007: Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. S. Solomon et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, 129–234.
Hansen, H. K., P. Rasmussen, A. Fredenslund, M. Schiller, and J. Gmehling, 1991: Vapor-liquid equilibria by Unifac group contribution. 5. Revision and extension. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30 , 10. 2352–2355.
Henning, S., T. Rosenorn, B. D’Anna, A. A. Gola, B. Svenningsson, and M. Bilde, 2005: Cloud droplet activation and surface tension of mixtures of slightly soluble organics and inorganic salt. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5 , 575–582.
Hoffer, A., A. Gelencser, P. Guyon, G. Kiss, O. Schmid, G. P. Frank, P. Artaxo, and M. O. Andreae, 2006: Optical properties of humic-like substances (HULIS) in biomass-burning aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 3563–3570.
Kiss, G., E. Tombacz, B. Varga, T. Alsberg, and L. Persson, 2003: Estimation of the average molecular weight of humic-like substances isolated from fine atmospheric aerosol. Atmos. Environ., 37 , 3783–3794.
Kiss, G., E. Tombacz, and H. C. Hansson, 2005: Surface tension effects of humic-like substances in the aqueous extract of tropospheric fine aerosol. J. Atmos. Chem., 50 , 279–294.
Koehler, K. A., S. M. Kreidenweis, P. J. DeMott, A. J. Prenni, C. M. Carrico, B. Ervens, and G. Feingold, 2006: Water activity and activation diameters from hygroscopicity data. Part II: Application to organic species. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 795–809.
Kokkola, H., R. Sorjamaa, A. Peräniemi, T. Raatikainen, and A. Laaksonen, 2006: Cloud formation of particles containing humic-like substances. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 .L10816, doi:10.1029/2006GL026107.
Kreidenweis, S. M., K. A. Koehler, P. DeMott, A. J. Prenni, C. M. Carrico, and B. Ervens, 2005: Water activity and activation diameters from hygroscopicity data. Part I: Theory and application to inorganic salts. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5 , 1357–1370.
Li, Z., A. L. Williams, and M. J. Rood, 1998: Influence of soluble surfactant properties on the activation of aerosol particles containing inorganic solute. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 1859–1866.
Low, R. D. H., 1969: A generalized equation for the solution effect in droplet growth. J. Atmos. Sci., 26 , 608–611.
McFiggans, G., and Coauthors, 2006: The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 2593–2649.
Poling, B. E., J. M. Prausnitz, and J. P. O’Connell, 2001: The Properties of Gases and Liquids. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, 768 pp.
Prenni, A. J., M. D. Petters, S. M. Kreidenweis, P. J. DeMott, and P. J. Ziemann, 2007: Cloud droplet activation of secondary organic aerosol. J. Geophys. Res., 112 .D10223, doi:10.1029/2006JD007963.
Pruppacher, H. R., and J. D. Klett, 1997: Equilibrium between an aqueous salt solution and water vapor. Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, Kluwer Academic, 109–115.
Rissler, J., E. Swietlicki, J. Zhou, G. Roberts, M. O. Andreae, G. L. Von, and P. Artaxo, 2004: Physical properties of the sub-micrometer aerosol over the Amazon rain forest during the wet-to-dry season transition—Comparison of modeled and measured CCN concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4 , 2119–2143.
Salma, I., R. Ocskay, I. Varga, and W. Maenhaut, 2006: Surface tension of atmospheric humic-like substances in connection with relaxation, dilution, and solution pH. J. Geophys. Res., 111 .D23205, doi:10.1029/2005JD007015.
Samburova, V., R. Zenobi, and M. Kalberer, 2005: Characterization of high molecular weight compounds in urban atmospheric particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5 , 2163–2170.
Sorjamaa, R., and A. Laaksonen, 2006: The influence of surfactant properties on critical supersaturations of cloud condensation nuclei. J. Aerosol Sci., 37 , 1730–1736.
Sorjamaa, R., B. Svenningsson, T. Raatikainen, S. Henning, M. Bilde, and A. Laaksonen, 2004: The role of surfactants in Köhler theory reconsidered. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4 , 2107–2117.
Stroud, C. A., and Coauthors, 2007: Cloud activating properties of aerosol observed during CELTIC. J. Atmos. Sci., 64 , 441–459.
Svenningsson, B., and Coauthors, 2006: Hygroscopic growth and critical supersaturations for mixed aerosol particles of inorganic and organic compounds of atmospheric relevance. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 , 1937–1952.
Szyszkowski, B., 1908: Experimentelle Studien über kapillare Eigenschaften der wässrigen Lösungen von Fettsäuren. Z. Physik. Chem., 64 , 385–414.
Taraniuk, I., E. R. Graber, A. Kostinski, and Y. Rudich, 2007: Surfactant properties of atmospheric and model humic-like substances (HULIS). Geophys. Res. Lett., 34 .L16807, doi:10.1029/2007GL029576.
Topping, D. O., G. B. McFiggans, and H. Coe, 2005a: A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model framework. Part 1: Inorganic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5 , 1205–1222.
Topping, D. O., G. B. McFiggans, and H. Coe, 2005b: A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model framework. Part 2: Including organic compounds. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5 , 1223–1242.
Topping, D. O., G. B. McFiggans, G. Kiss, Z. Varga, M. C. Facchini, S. Decesari, and M. Mircea, 2007: Surface tensions of multi-component mixed inorganic/organic aqueous systems of atmospheric significance: Measurements, model predictions and importance for cloud activation predictions. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7 , 2371–2398.
Tuch, T., B. Wehner, M. Pitz, J. Cyrys, J. Heinrich, W. G. Kreyling, H. E. Wichmann, and A. Wiedensohler, 2003: Long-term measurements of size-segregated ambient aerosol in two German cities located 100 km apart. Atmos. Environ., 37 , 4687–4700.
Twomey, S., 1974: Pollution and the planetary albedo. Atmos. Environ., 8 , 1251–1256.
Wex, H., C. Neusüβ, M. Wendisch, F. Stratmann, C. Koziar, A. Keil, A. Wiedensohler, and M. Ebert, 2002: Particle scattering, backscattering, and absorption coefficients: An in situ closure and sensitivity study. J. Geophys. Res., 107 .8122, doi:10.1029/2000JD000234.
Wex, H., and Coauthors, 2007: Hygroscopic growth and measured and modeled critical super-saturations of an atmospheric HULIS sample. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34 .L02818, doi:10.1029/2006GL028260.
Zhou, J., E. Swietlicki, O. H. Berg, P. P. Aalto, K. Hämeri, E. D. Nilsson, and C. Leck, 2001: Hygroscopic properties of aerosol particles over the central Arctic Ocean during summer. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , 32111–32123.
Ziese, M., H. Wex, E. Nilsson, I. Salma, R. Ocskay, T. Hennig, A. Massling, and F. Stratmann, 2008: Hygroscopic growth and activation of HULIS particles: Experimental data and a new iterative parameterization scheme for complex aerosol particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8 , 1855–1866.

(top) The osmotic coefficient, following Pruppacher and Klett (1997). The dotted line indicates the value of 0.733, which, together with ν = 3, corresponds to a constant i of 2.2. (bottom) The deviation between this constant value and the varying osmotic coefficient, given as a percentage.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

(top) The osmotic coefficient, following Pruppacher and Klett (1997). The dotted line indicates the value of 0.733, which, together with ν = 3, corresponds to a constant i of 2.2. (bottom) The deviation between this constant value and the varying osmotic coefficient, given as a percentage.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
(top) The osmotic coefficient, following Pruppacher and Klett (1997). The dotted line indicates the value of 0.733, which, together with ν = 3, corresponds to a constant i of 2.2. (bottom) The deviation between this constant value and the varying osmotic coefficient, given as a percentage.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

A comparison of the Koehler curves for an ammonium sulfate particle with a dry diameter of 50 nm from the model of Topping et al. (2005a) and from the model used in this study.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

A comparison of the Koehler curves for an ammonium sulfate particle with a dry diameter of 50 nm from the model of Topping et al. (2005a) and from the model used in this study.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
A comparison of the Koehler curves for an ammonium sulfate particle with a dry diameter of 50 nm from the model of Topping et al. (2005a) and from the model used in this study.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values for a concentration-dependent σs for two different HULIS samples, based on a parameterization of measured hygroscopic growth and activation given in ZW08. The dotted line roughly divides the concentration range in a hygroscopic growth and an activation regime.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values for a concentration-dependent σs for two different HULIS samples, based on a parameterization of measured hygroscopic growth and activation given in ZW08. The dotted line roughly divides the concentration range in a hygroscopic growth and an activation regime.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Values for a concentration-dependent σs for two different HULIS samples, based on a parameterization of measured hygroscopic growth and activation given in ZW08. The dotted line roughly divides the concentration range in a hygroscopic growth and an activation regime.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Different combinations of K and aw, yielding different Koehler curves: (left) variations in σs for fixed values of Nion for the two different substances; (right) varying values of Nion for a constant σs.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Different combinations of K and aw, yielding different Koehler curves: (left) variations in σs for fixed values of Nion for the two different substances; (right) varying values of Nion for a constant σs.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Different combinations of K and aw, yielding different Koehler curves: (left) variations in σs for fixed values of Nion for the two different substances; (right) varying values of Nion for a constant σs.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values of the wet diameters dd at fixed saturations for different variations of (top) Nion and (bottom) σs for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm (consisting of the less hygroscopic model substance).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values of the wet diameters dd at fixed saturations for different variations of (top) Nion and (bottom) σs for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm (consisting of the less hygroscopic model substance).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Values of the wet diameters dd at fixed saturations for different variations of (top) Nion and (bottom) σs for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm (consisting of the less hygroscopic model substance).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values of Scrit for both variations of σs for a constant aw and variations of Nion for a constant K for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm (consisting of the less hygroscopic model substance).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values of Scrit for both variations of σs for a constant aw and variations of Nion for a constant K for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm (consisting of the less hygroscopic model substance).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Values of Scrit for both variations of σs for a constant aw and variations of Nion for a constant K for particles with a dry diameter of 50 nm (consisting of the less hygroscopic model substance).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

The sensitivities of dd and Scrit to variations in σs or Nion for both model substances, with results for different ddry, from 50 to 125 nm.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

The sensitivities of dd and Scrit to variations in σs or Nion for both model substances, with results for different ddry, from 50 to 125 nm.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
The sensitivities of dd and Scrit to variations in σs or Nion for both model substances, with results for different ddry, from 50 to 125 nm.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

(top) Modeled hygroscopic growth for HULIS particles with ddry = 100 nm, first using the σ of water (water case) and then using values for σs as given in Fig. 3 (HULIS1 and HULIS2). (bottom) The difference between the measured equilibrium diameter of the water case and HULIS1 or HULIS2, respectively, in nm.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

(top) Modeled hygroscopic growth for HULIS particles with ddry = 100 nm, first using the σ of water (water case) and then using values for σs as given in Fig. 3 (HULIS1 and HULIS2). (bottom) The difference between the measured equilibrium diameter of the water case and HULIS1 or HULIS2, respectively, in nm.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
(top) Modeled hygroscopic growth for HULIS particles with ddry = 100 nm, first using the σ of water (water case) and then using values for σs as given in Fig. 3 (HULIS1 and HULIS2). (bottom) The difference between the measured equilibrium diameter of the water case and HULIS1 or HULIS2, respectively, in nm.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values of Scrit at different dry particle sizes using either σ of water or the concentration-dependent values of σs from ZW08.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Values of Scrit at different dry particle sizes using either σ of water or the concentration-dependent values of σs from ZW08.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Values of Scrit at different dry particle sizes using either σ of water or the concentration-dependent values of σs from ZW08.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Surface excess concentrations vs wet diameter for a fulvic acid particle (black; left axis) with an initial dry diameter of 100 (solid line) or 200 nm (dashed–dotted line). Also shown are the corresponding surface tensions (gray; right axis) for both the partitioning and the nonpartitioning case (thick and thin gray lines, respectively).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Surface excess concentrations vs wet diameter for a fulvic acid particle (black; left axis) with an initial dry diameter of 100 (solid line) or 200 nm (dashed–dotted line). Also shown are the corresponding surface tensions (gray; right axis) for both the partitioning and the nonpartitioning case (thick and thin gray lines, respectively).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Surface excess concentrations vs wet diameter for a fulvic acid particle (black; left axis) with an initial dry diameter of 100 (solid line) or 200 nm (dashed–dotted line). Also shown are the corresponding surface tensions (gray; right axis) for both the partitioning and the nonpartitioning case (thick and thin gray lines, respectively).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Koehler curves (black) for a fulvic acid particle with an initial dry diameter of 100 (solid lines) or 200 nm (dashed–dotted lines) for the partitioning (thick lines) and the nonpartitioning (thin lines) cases. Also shown, in gray, are the corresponding surface tensions from Fig. 10.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Koehler curves (black) for a fulvic acid particle with an initial dry diameter of 100 (solid lines) or 200 nm (dashed–dotted lines) for the partitioning (thick lines) and the nonpartitioning (thin lines) cases. Also shown, in gray, are the corresponding surface tensions from Fig. 10.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Koehler curves (black) for a fulvic acid particle with an initial dry diameter of 100 (solid lines) or 200 nm (dashed–dotted lines) for the partitioning (thick lines) and the nonpartitioning (thin lines) cases. Also shown, in gray, are the corresponding surface tensions from Fig. 10.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Atmospheric particle number size distributions measured at (left) a rural location during LACE 98 (Wex et al. 2002) and (right) a rural background station (IfT; Tuch et al. 2003).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Atmospheric particle number size distributions measured at (left) a rural location during LACE 98 (Wex et al. 2002) and (right) a rural background station (IfT; Tuch et al. 2003).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Atmospheric particle number size distributions measured at (left) a rural location during LACE 98 (Wex et al. 2002) and (right) a rural background station (IfT; Tuch et al. 2003).
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Particles activated to droplets for an identical Scrit when either σs = 72.8 mN m−1 (gray area; N′act, dcrit = 125 nm) or σs = 65.5 mN m−1 (hatched area; N″act, dcrit = 112.5 nm) is used to derive dcrit.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1

Particles activated to droplets for an identical Scrit when either σs = 72.8 mN m−1 (gray area; N′act, dcrit = 125 nm) or σs = 65.5 mN m−1 (hatched area; N″act, dcrit = 112.5 nm) is used to derive dcrit.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Particles activated to droplets for an identical Scrit when either σs = 72.8 mN m−1 (gray area; N′act, dcrit = 125 nm) or σs = 65.5 mN m−1 (hatched area; N″act, dcrit = 112.5 nm) is used to derive dcrit.
Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 12; 10.1175/2008JAS2720.1
Properties of the more and less hygroscopic substances used in the sensitivity analysis (ammonium sulfate and HULIS). The nonideal behavior of ammonium sulfate was modeled following Pruppacher and Klett (1997). Values for HULIS were taken in accordance with WH07.


Values of parameters as used when determining the change in the number of activated droplets on a change in σs.

