1. Introduction
The Northern Hemisphere (NH) midlatitude surface is a source of major greenhouse gases, ozone-depleting substances, tropospheric ozone (and its precursors), and aerosols. To better predict tropospheric air quality, stratospheric ozone depletion, and changes in Earth’s radiative balance, therefore, it is important to determine the factors that control the distributions of species emitted from NH midlatitudes. Trace gas distributions, however, are hard to interpret, owing to the complex interplay between species’ emissions, chemistry, and transport, which are difficult to disentangle even for long-lived species.
Partly owing to long-standing gaps in our understanding of tropospheric transport, climate models struggle to accurately represent present (and project future) distributions of a broad range of tropospheric trace gases and aerosols, including carbon monoxide, tropospheric ozone, and black carbon (e.g., Shindell et al. 2008; Young et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2013). Uncertainties in tropospheric transport persist largely because the transport circulation is not directly observable and reflects the complicated combination of the slow mean diabatic circulation and rapid isentropic mixing (Plumb and Mahlman 1987). Thus, while several studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of interhemispheric transport (e.g., Holzer 1999; Bowman and Erukhimova 2004), isentropic transport to the Arctic (e.g., Klonecki et al. 2003; Stohl 2006), and extratropical mixing (e.g., Leibensperger and Plumb 2014; Chen and Plumb 2014), many fundamental aspects of the tropospheric transport circulation remain poorly understood.
One fundamental aspect of transport that is important for understanding the distributions of species emitted in the NH is the time that it takes for transport to occur from the NH midlatitude surface to different regions in the troposphere. Waugh et al. (2013) used surface measurements of sulfur hexaflouride (SF6) to infer the average time since the air in different regions in the troposphere last contacted the NH midlatitude surface or the “mean age.” The mean age, which is calculated for locations throughout the troposphere, provides a richer description of transport than the hemispherically integrated interhemispheric exchange time (e.g., Levin and Hesshaimer 1996; Geller et al. 1997) and presents the advantage that, while it is equal to the SF6 age (Waugh et al. 2013), it can be calculated in models independent of SF6. Thus, unlike the SF6 age—which reflects intermodel differences in prescribed chemical emissions and is validated using SF6 measurements that often vary between measurement datasets—the mean age is a tracer-independent diagnostic of the flow that is independent of any particular trace species (e.g., Holzer and Hall 2000; Haine and Hall 2002).
One limitation of the mean age is that it summarizes tropospheric transport in terms of a single time scale. Because of irreversible diffusive mixing, however, there is a broad range of times and paths for transport to occur from a region (here, the NH midlatitude surface), which can be summarized in terms of the transit-time distribution (TTD), where “transit time” refers to the elapsed time since last contact occurred at the surface (Holzer and Hall 2000). The TTD has been shown to be a far more powerful diagnostic than the mean age in understanding transport in the oceans (e.g., Primeau and Holzer 2006; Holzer and Primeau 2010) and the stratosphere, where it is commonly referred to as the age spectrum (Hall and Plumb 1994; Waugh and Hall 2002). By comparison, fewer studies have examined the TTD in the troposphere. Exceptions include a few studies that have used the TTD to examine interhemispheric exchange (Holzer and Boer 2001; Holzer 2009) and low-level transpacific transport (Holzer et al. 2003, 2005; Holzer and Hall 2007).
In addition to being a fundamental description of the flow, the TTD is also a propagator of boundary conditions applied over a control surface
Another consequence of Eq. (1) is that the spatial patterns and time variations of tracers that are emitted over NH midlatitudes and subject to different loss rates
Here, we present an analysis of the transit-time distribution connecting the NH midlatitude surface to the free troposphere, based on simulations of the NASA Global Modeling Initiative Chemistry Transport Model driven with MERRA meteorological fields. Our main goal is to present a rigorous tracer-independent description of transport from the NH midlatitude surface, which roughly corresponds to the region of largest emissions of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances, and which we define here as surface latitudes spanning 30°–50°N. As such, our analysis focuses primarily on documenting the main properties of the TTD in terms of its characteristic time scales (section 3) and on using the TTD to infer transport pathways from the NH midlatitude surface to the free troposphere (section 4).
While our analysis focuses on one particular model, we note that the simulations in this study were performed as part of the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC)/Stratospheric Processes and their Role in Climate (SPARC) Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI). In section 5, therefore, we also explore the relationship between the TTD and idealized loss tracers that were requested by CCMI as standard model output and are similar in spirit to idealized carbon monoxide tracers that have been examined in previous studies (e.g., Shindell et al. 2008; Monks et al. 2015). Specifically, we examine the behaviors of tracers that are emitted uniformly over
2. Methods
a. Model simulations
We use the NASA Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) three-dimensional chemistry transport model (CTM) (Strahan et al. 2007), which has a horizontal resolution of 2° latitude by 2.5° longitude with 72 vertical levels spanning the surface to 0.01 hPa. We analyze one integration of the CTM driven with MERRA meteorological fields for the years 2000–10 (Rienecker et al. 2011), which is identical to the simulation used in Waugh et al. (2013). That study, however, only presented calculations of the mean age, not the TTD.
b. Idealized tracers
We examine two types of idealized tracers that are carried in the integration: 1) tracers that are used to infer the TTD and 2) tracers subject to spatially uniform exponential loss. All tracers’ boundary conditions are defined over the same zonally uniform surface NH midlatitude region
Table of tracers integrated in the GMI–MERRA simulation. All tracers satisfy the tracer continuity equation,
1) TTD tracers
We construct the boundary propagator using four boundary impulse response (BIR) tracers, each of which corresponds to a particular instance (in
After shifting each BIR at each grid cell about τ = 0, we treat the average of the centered BIRs as our approximation to the TTD, designated throughout as
Throughout, we refer to the mean transit time as the “mean age” for consistency with the presentation in Waugh et al. (2013), and this needs to be distinguished from the mean age presented in other studies (Ray et al. 1999; Engel et al. 2006; Patra et al. 2009), which conceptually are similar but are defined with respect to transport from the tropical tropopause or tropical surface, not the NH midlatitude surface layer.
One important caveat of our approach is that, while for unsteady flow the statistics of the TTD and the BIR are identical, the direct time-evolving product of the pulse tracer method
This distinction between the BIR approximation and the TTD becomes important when considering seasonal variations in the TTD or, more generally, for unsteady flows (Holzer et al. 2003; Haine et al. 2008). For flows that are not stationary, one can recover the TTD by constructing a boundary propagator map using a large number of BIR tracers (Holzer et al. 2003; Haine et al. 2008), an approach that can be simplified by assuming that interannual variations in transport are sufficiently small compared to seasonal variability (Li et al. 2012). More about the simplified BIR method and distinctions with the TTD can be found in these studies.
In addition to looking at annual averages of the modal age and the moments of the TTD, we examine their seasonal cycles in section 5. Note that we use the ideal age tracer
2) Loss tracers
The idealized loss tracers
Throughout, we normalize the 5- and 50-day tracer concentrations by their average concentrations over the NH midlatitude source region
3. Transit-time distribution
We first describe the shape of
Changes in the shape of the TTD are reflected by changes in the relationship between the mean age
The largest gradients in
Unlike the mean age, the modal age
Unlike the modal age, the spectral width (Fig. 2c) features strong meridional gradients in the NH, where
The changing relationship between
In the NH, where Δ/Γ > 1, the TTD is broader (relative to mean age) than in the SH, where Δ/Γ < 1. Our physical interpretation of the broader TTD in the NH is that fast transport paths from
In the NH, the large gradients in
4. Transport pathways
In the previous section, we showed that the relationship between the mean age, modal age and spectral width changes in the troposphere in concert with changes in the shape of the TTD, which we interpreted in terms of the disappearance of fast transport pathways (in the SH) and eddy-diffusive recirculations (in the NH underworld). We further examine this interpretation by explicitly examining the transport pathways that connect the NH midlatitude surface to the free troposphere, which we infer from the BIR fractions
It is important to contrast
a. Fast transport pathways
The fast transport paths that trace back to
1) Arctic
The fastest transport paths into the Arctic are associated with air that leaves the NH midlatitude surface in January, with
The BIR-based indications of an “up and over” transport pathway from
In contrast to boreal winter, the fastest transport paths during summer connect the midlatitude surface to the midlatitude and subtropical upper troposphere. The patterns of the BIR fractions
2) Tropics and subtropics
Next, we discuss seasonal variations in the fast transport paths that connect the NH midlatitude surface region
By comparison, the modal transit times in the SH subtropics corresponding to the other source times
Longitudinal sections of
Several studies have examined the relationship between cross-equatorial transport and the southward extent of tropical convection, invoking shifts in the ITCZ to interpret the seasonal cycles of surface SF6 (Gloor et al. 2007) and mean age (Waugh et al. 2013; Holzer and Waugh 2015). By comparison, fewer studies have examined the underlying cross-equatorial transport pathways, especially in the upper troposphere. The BIR fractions
During boreal summer there is a large increase in fast cross-equatorial transport above 200 hPa, with the fastest transport paths (i.e., τ ∈ [1, 10] days) passing through a narrow region over the Indian Ocean and relatively older transport paths (i.e., τ > 10 days) spanning a broader range of longitudes over the east Pacific (Figs. 5f–j). Maps of
The rapid upper-tropospheric pathway over the Indian Ocean appears connected to the Asian monsoon. Previous studies have shown the important role of the Asian monsoon in supplying boundary layer constituents to the lower stratosphere (Park et al. 2004; Randel et al. 2010; Park et al. 2013; Bergman et al. 2013), but fewer studies have addressed the role of the monsoon in transporting NH surface air and trace species into the SH. How this occurs—via the meridional advection of convectively detraining air across the equator or through eddy-driven processes like the shedding of PV along the southward edge of the anticyclone (Popovic and Plumb 2001)—is not well understood and will be explored in future work.
b. Older transport pathways: Recirculation back into the Northern Hemisphere
In section 3, we discussed how large gradients in
The BIR fractions
During boreal summer, by comparison, the mean sense of the circulation in the tropical upper troposphere acts to oppose transport back into the NH, which is reflected in the weak vertical gradients in
It is more difficult to meaningfully infer pathways for τ > 1 yr, as older air parcels reflects more circuitous and less clearly defined paths, which is consistent with the diffusive nature of transport. Nonetheless, successive integrals of
We obtain a more quantitative measure of the importance of eddy-diffusive recirculations by fitting the tails of the TTD with an exponentially decaying mode
5. Idealized loss tracers
We now capitalize on the interpretation of the TTD as a propagator of chemical boundary conditions [Eq. (1)] in order to examine how short-lived tracers are controlled by different aspects of the TTD. Our approach is to examine the 5- and 50-day loss tracers, first in terms of their annually averaged distributions
To interpret the different spatial patterns of the idealized loss tracers in terms of the underlying TTD, we compare the spatial distributions of
There is also a close correspondence between the seasonality of the 5-day tracer and
By comparison, the seasonal cycle of the 50-day decay tracer
We can be more precise in describing the transition between a tracer with a strong seasonal cycle in the Arctic
Outside of the NH underworld, the strong relationship between
This point is illustrated more systematically by comparing vertical profiles of
The close correspondence between
6. Conclusions
The main goal of this study has been to provide a rigorous analysis of transport from the NH midlatitude surface in terms of the transit-time distribution (TTD). In addition to documenting its main properties, we have also used the TTD to understand the spatial patterns and time variations of idealized loss tracers. To do this, we capitalized on the interpretation of the TTD as a propagator of chemical boundary conditions and focused on one class of idealized tracers: decay tracers subject to uniform exponential loss. Our analysis, based on calculations using the NASA GMI Chemistry Transport Model driven with MERRA meteorological fields, reveals the following:
The mean transit time, or “mean age,” represents the average of a broad TTD that is characterized by long flat tails. This results in mean ages
that are significantly larger than their corresponding modal transit times or “modal ages” . The shape of the TTD transitions from
> 2 over NH high latitudes, to ~0.7 in the SH extratropics, where the TTD approaches a more symmetric distribution resembling an inverse Gaussian. Changes in in the NH are dominated by changes in the mean age, which increases from ~0.25 yr at high latitudes to ~1.25 yr in the subtropics, while remains nearly uniform. By comparison, changes in the shape of the TTD in the tropics and SH extratropics primarily reflect changes in the modal age, which increases sharply as fast surface transport paths disappear south of ~20°S. Physically, changes in the shape of the TTD signal changes in the contributions of fast transport pathways relative to slow eddy-diffusive recirculations. At the SH subtropical surface, large gradients in
signal the disappearance of fast cross-equatorial transport paths; by comparison, large gradients in at the isentropic boundary between the NH middleworld and underworld reflect changes in eddy-diffusive recirculations. The spatial patterns and seasonal variations of idealized 5- and 50-day loss tracers (
and , respectively) are controlled by different aspects of the TTD. In the Arctic, corresponds closely to the modal age and has a strong seasonal cycle that reflects changes in fast isentropic transport from the midlatitude surface. The correspondence between and , however, weakens in regions where fast transport paths contribute less mass to the TTD, such as in the NH middleworld and the SH extratropics. In the SH subtropical upper troposphere, for example, the distribution of corresponds more closely to that of the 50-day loss tracer , which varies in concert with seasonal changes in upper-tropospheric cross-equatorial flow associated with the Asian monsoon.
One important caveat in our study is that our results represent the transport climate of one model, and our analysis will need to be repeated for other chemistry transport models and chemistry–climate models. Our focus in section 5 on the idealized loss tracers that were requested in the CCMI model intercomparison will provide an immediate opportunity to perform such a comparison. Our illustrations with the GMI–MERRA simulation, therefore, provide a benchmark for interpreting the 5- and 50-day idealized loss tracers in terms of fundamental TTD time scales that may be useful when assessing transport in models. In particular, the fact that
Another application of the idealized tracers that was not explored here but will be examined in future work is to identify real species that may be idealized as
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful for discussions with Gang Chen, who provided constructive feedback. This research was supported by an appointment to the NASA Postdoctoral Program at the Goddard Space Flight Center, administered by Oak Ridge Associated Universities through a contract with NASA. The authors also acknowledge support from NSF Grant AGS-1403676 (D.W.) and NASA Grant NNX14AP58G (D.W.).
APPENDIX
Approximation of the TTD
Throughout this paper, the TTD is approximated using
REFERENCES
Bergman, J. W., F. Fierli, E. J. Jensen, S. Honomichl, and L. L. Pan, 2013: Boundary layer sources for the Asian anticyclone: Regional contributions to a vertical conduit. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2560–2575, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50142.
Bowman, K. P., 2006: Transport of carbon monoxide from the tropics to the extratropics. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D02107, doi:10.1029/2005JD006137.
Bowman, K. P., and T. Erukhimova, 2004: Comparison of global-scale Lagrangian transport properties of the NCEP reanalysis and CCM3. J. Climate, 17, 1135–1146, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1135:COGLTP>2.0.CO;2.
Chen, G., and A. Plumb, 2014: Effective isentropic diffusivity of tropospheric transport. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3499–3520, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0333.1.
Chen, P., 1995: Isentropic cross-tropopause mass exchange in the extratropics. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 16 661–16 673, doi:10.1029/95JD01264.
Ehhalt, D., F. Rohrer, S. Schauffler, and M. Prather, 2004: On the decay of stratospheric pollutants: Diagnosing the longest-lived eigenmode. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D08102, doi:10.1029/2003JD004029.
Engel, A., and Coauthors, 2006: Highly resolved observations of trace gases in the lowermost stratosphere and upper troposphere from the Spurt project: An overview. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 283–301, doi:10.5194/acp-6-283-2006.
England, M. H., 1995: The age of water and ventilation timescales in a global ocean model. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 2756–2777, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1995)025<2756:TAOWAV>2.0.CO;2.
Geller, L., J. Elkins, J. M. Lobert, A. Clarke, D. Hurst, J. Butler, and R. Myers, 1997: Tropospheric SF6: Observed latitudinal distribution and trends, derived emissions and interhemispheric exchange time. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 675–678, doi:10.1029/97GL00523.
Gloor, M., and Coauthors, 2007: Three-dimensional SF6 data and tropospheric transport simulations: Signals, modeling accuracy, and implications for inverse modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D15112, doi:10.1029/2006JD007973.
Guenther, A., C. Geron, T. Pierce, B. Lamb, P. Harley, and R. Fall, 2000: Natural emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen from North America. Atmos. Environ., 34, 2205–2230, doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00465-3.
Haine, T. W. N., and T. M. Hall, 2002: A generalized transport theory: Water-mass composition and age. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 1932–1946, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1932:AGTTWM>2.0.CO;2.
Haine, T. W. N., H. Zhang, D. Waugh, and M. Holzer, 2008: On transit-time distributions in unsteady circulation models. Ocean Modell., 21, 35–45, doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.11.004.
Hall, T. M., and R. A. Plumb, 1994: Age as a diagnostic of stratospheric transport. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 1059–1070, doi:10.1029/93JD03192.
Hall, T. M., T. W. Haine, and D. W. Waugh, 2002: Inferring the concentration of anthropogenic carbon in the ocean from tracers. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 16, 1131, doi:10.1029/2001GB001835.
Holzer, M., 1999: Analysis of passive tracer transport as modeled by an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Climate, 12, 1659–1684, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1659:AOPTTA>2.0.CO;2.
Holzer, M., 2009: The path density of interhemispheric surface-to-surface transport. Part II: Transport through the troposphere and stratosphere diagnosed from NCEP data. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2172–2189, doi:10.1175/2009JAS2895.1.
Holzer, M., and T. M. Hall, 2000: Transit-time and tracer-age distributions in geophysical flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3539–3558, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<3539:TTATAD>2.0.CO;2.
Holzer, M., and G. J. Boer, 2001: Simulated changes in atmospheric transport climate. J. Climate, 14, 4398–4420, doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<4398:SCIATC>2.0.CO;2.
Holzer, M., and T. M. Hall, 2007: Low-level transpacific transport. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09103, doi:10.1029/2006JD007828.
Holzer, M., and F. W. Primeau, 2010: Improved constraints on transit time distributions from argon 39: A maximum entropy approach. J. Geophys. Res., 115, C12021, doi:10.1029/2010JC006410.
Holzer, M., and D. W. Waugh, 2015: Interhemispheric transit-time distributions and path-dependent lifetimes constrained by measurements of SF6, CFCs, and CFC replacements. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4581–4589, doi:10.1002/2015GL064172.
Holzer, M., I. G. McKendry, and D. A. Jaffe, 2003: Springtime trans-Pacific atmospheric transport from East Asia: A transit-time probability density function approach. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4708, doi:10.1029/2003JD003558.
Holzer, M., T. M. Hall, and R. B. Stull, 2005: Seasonality and weather-driven variability of transpacific transport. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23103, doi:10.1029/2005JD006261.
Hoskins, B. J., 1991: Towards a PV–θ view of the general circulation. Tellus, 43A, 27–35, doi:10.1034/j.1600-0870.1991.t01-3-00005.x.
Khatiwala, S., F. Primeau, and T. Hall, 2009: Reconstruction of the history of anthropogenic CO2 concentrations in the ocean. Nature, 462, 346–349, doi:10.1038/nature08526.
Klonecki, A., P. Hess, L. Emmons, L. Smith, J. Orlando, and D. Blake, 2003: Seasonal changes in the transport of pollutants into the Arctic troposphere-model study. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8367, doi:10.1029/2002JD002199.
Konopka, P., J.-U. Grooß, F. Plöger, and R. Müller, 2009: Annual cycle of horizontal in-mixing into the lower tropical stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D19111, doi:10.1029/2009JD011955.
Law, K. S., and A. Stohl, 2007: Arctic air pollution: Origins and impacts. Science, 315, 1537–1540, doi:10.1126/science.1137695.
Lee, Y., and Coauthors, 2013: Evaluation of preindustrial to present-day black carbon and its albedo forcing from Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2607–2634, doi:10.5194/acp-13-2607-2013.
Leibensperger, E. M., and R. A. Plumb, 2014: Effective diffusivity in baroclinic flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 972–984, doi:10.1175/JAS-D-13-0217.1.
Levin, I., and V. Hesshaimer, 1996: Refining of atmospheric transport model entries by the globally observed passive tracer distributions of 85krypton and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). J. Geophys. Res., 101, 16 745–16 755, doi:10.1029/96JD01058.
Li, F., D. W. Waugh, A. R. Douglass, P. A. Newman, S. Pawson, R. S. Stolarski, S. E. Strahan, and J. E. Nielsen, 2012: Seasonal variations of stratospheric age spectra in the Goddard Earth Observing System Chemistry Climate Model (GEOSCCM). J. Geophys. Res., 117, D05134, doi:10.1029/2011JD016877.
Liang, Q., and Coauthors, 2010: Finding the missing stratospheric Bry: A global modeling study of CHBr3 and CH2Br2. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2269–2286, doi:10.5194/acp-10-2269-2010.
Mahlman, J., 1997: Dynamics of transport processes in the upper troposphere. Science, 276, 1079–1083, doi:10.1126/science.276.5315.1079.
Monks, S., and Coauthors, 2015: Multi-model study of chemical and physical controls on transport of anthropogenic and biomass burning pollution to the Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3575–3603, doi:10.5194/acp-15-3575-2015.
Orbe, C., P. A. Newman, D. W. Waugh, M. Holzer, L. D. Oman, F. Li, and L. M. Polvani, 2015: Airmass origin in the Arctic. Part I: Seasonality. J. Climate, 28, 4997–5014, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00720.1.
Park, M., W. J. Randel, D. E. Kinnison, R. R. Garcia, and W. Choi, 2004: Seasonal variation of methane, water vapor, and nitrogen oxides near the tropopause: Satellite observations and model simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D03302, doi:10.1029/2003JD003706.
Park, M., W. J. Randel, D. E. Kinnison, L. K. Emmons, P. F. Bernath, K. A. Walker, C. D. Boone, and N. J. Livesey, 2013: Hydrocarbons in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere observed from ACE-FTS and comparisons with WACCM. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1964–1980, doi:10.1029/2012JD018327.
Patra, P., M. Takigawa, G. Dutton, K. Uhse, K. Ishijima, B. Lintner, K. Miyazaki, and J. Elkins, 2009: Transport mechanisms for synoptic, seasonal and interannual SF6 variations and “age” of air in troposphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1209–1225, doi:10.5194/acp-9-1209-2009.
Plumb, R., and J. Mahlman, 1987: The zonally averaged transport characteristics of the GFDL general circulation/transport model. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 298–327, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<0298:TZATCO>2.0.CO;2.
Popovic, J. M., and R. A. Plumb, 2001: Eddy shedding from the upper-tropospheric Asian monsoon anticyclone. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 93–104, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0093:ESFTUT>2.0.CO;2.
Prather, M., M. McElroy, S. Wofsy, G. Russell, and D. Rind, 1987: Chemistry of the global troposphere: Fluorocarbons as tracers of air motion. J. Geophys. Res., 92, 6579–6613, doi:10.1029/JD092iD06p06579.
Primeau, F. W., and M. Holzer, 2006: The ocean’s memory of the atmosphere: Residence-time and ventilation-rate distributions of water masses. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 36, 1439–1456, doi:10.1175/JPO2919.1.
Prinn, R., and Coauthors, 1992: Global average concentration and trend for hydroxyl radicals deduced from ALE/GAGE trichloroethane (methyl chloroform) data for 1978–1990. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2445–2461, doi:10.1029/91JD02755.
Randel, W. J., M. Park, L. Emmons, D. Kinnison, P. Bernath, K. A. Walker, C. Boone, and H. Pumphrey, 2010: Asian monsoon transport of pollution to the stratosphere. Science, 328, 611–613, doi:10.1126/science.1182274.
Ray, E. A., F. L. Moore, J. W. Elkins, G. S. Dutton, D. W. Fahey, H. Vömel, S. J. Oltmans, and K. H. Rosenlof, 1999: Transport into the Northern Hemisphere lowermost stratosphere revealed by in situ tracer measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26 565–26 580, doi:10.1029/1999JD900323.
Rienecker, M. M., and Coauthors, 2011: MERRA: NASA’s Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications. J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1.
Schoeberl, M. R., A. R. Douglass, B. Polansky, C. Boone, K. A. Walker, and P. Bernath, 2005: Estimation of stratospheric age spectrum from chemical tracers. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21303, doi:10.1029/2005JD006125.
Shindell, D., and Coauthors, 2008: A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5353–5372, doi:10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008.
Stohl, A., 2006: Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Arctic troposphere. J. Geophys. Res., 111, D11306, doi:10.1029/2005JD006888.
Strahan, S., B. Duncan, and P. Hoor, 2007: Observationally derived transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to the GMI chemistry and transport model. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445, doi:10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007.
Thiele, G., and J. Sarmiento, 1990: Tracer dating and ocean ventilation. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 9377–9391, doi:10.1029/JC095iC06p09377.
Waugh, D. W., and T. Hall, 2002: Age of stratospheric air: Theory, observations, and models. Rev. Geophys., 40, 1-1–1-26, doi:10.1029/2000RG000101.
Waugh, D. W., D. B. Considine, and E. L. Fleming, 2001: Is upper stratospheric chlorine decreasing as expected? Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1187–1190, doi:10.1029/2000GL011745.
Waugh, D. W., T. M. Hall, and T. W. Haine, 2003: Relationships among tracer ages. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3138, doi:10.1029/2002JC001325.
Waugh, D. W., T. M. Hall, B. I. McNeil, R. Key, and R. J. Matear, 2006: Anthropogenic CO2 in the oceans estimated using transit time distributions. Tellus, 58B, 376–389, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00222.x.
Waugh, D. W., and Coauthors, 2013: Tropospheric SF6: Age of air from the Northern Hemisphere midlatitude surface. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 11 429–11 441, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50848.
Young, P. J., and Coauthors, 2013: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, doi:10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013.