Article Type:
Correction

Corrigendum

Nadir Jeevanjee Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Nadir Jeevanjee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6657-896X
and
Stephan Fueglistaler Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Stephan Fueglistaler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication:
01 Apr 2020
Print Publication:
01 Apr 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0067.1
Page(s):
1509–1510
A related article is available
Free access

Current affiliation: Program in Atmosphere and Ocean Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.

© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Nadir Jeevanjee, nadirj@princeton.edu

Current affiliation: Program in Atmosphere and Ocean Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.

© 2020 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Nadir Jeevanjee, nadirj@princeton.edu
Keywords: Radiation budgets; Radiative fluxes; Radiative transfer

During the publication process for Jeevanjee and Fueglistaler (2020), several production errors occurred that need correction. First, in section 5 after Eq. (19), an incorrect inequality sign was used. The affected sentence should read “Physically, the τ = 1 law holds for such coordinates because τ ≈ 1 is a ‘sweet spot,’ in between τ ≪ 1 (where the optical depth gradient dτ/dξ goes to 0) and τ ≫ 1 (where the transmissivity e−τ goes to 0).”

The second correction involves the removal of an errant label between Figs. 7e and 7f. The correct Fig. 7 is shown below.

Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Profiles of the effective absorption coefficient κ1 for CO2, as predicted by Eq. (27) (red) as well as diagnosed from RFM (black) by linearly averaging κ⁡(ν˜,p) over those ν˜ that also contribute to Δν˜ in Eq. (20). The good agreement confirms the 1/p scaling for κ1, which underlies the stratospheric enhancement of Hν˜ (see Fig. 6).

Citation: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 77, 4; 10.1175/JAS-D-20-0067.1

The third error occurred in the last line of the first paragraph of section 6. The units of the spectrally resolved heating should be K day−1 cm, not K day−1 cm−1.

None of these errors affected the results or conclusions of the paper. AMS regrets any inconvenience these errors may have caused.

REFERENCE

Jeevanjee, N., and S. Fueglistaler, 2020: On the cooling-to-space approximation. J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 465–478, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0352.1.

  • Crossref
  • Search Google Scholar
  • Export Citation
Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
  • <sc>Fig</sc>. 7.
    View in gallery
    Fig. 7.

    Profiles of the effective absorption coefficient κ1 for CO2, as predicted by Eq. (27) (red) as well as diagnosed from RFM (black) by linearly averaging κ⁡(ν˜,p) over those ν˜ that also contribute to Δν˜ in Eq. (20). The good agreement confirms the 1/p scaling for κ1, which underlies the stratospheric enhancement of Hν˜ (see Fig. 6).

Fig. 7.

Profiles of the effective absorption coefficient κ1 for CO2, as predicted by Eq. (27) (red) as well as diagnosed from RFM (black) by linearly averaging κ⁡(ν˜,p) over those ν˜ that also contribute to Δν˜ in Eq. (20). The good agreement confirms the 1/p scaling for κ1, which underlies the stratospheric enhancement of Hν˜ (see Fig. 6).
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 32 0 0
Full Text Views 839 459 159
PDF Downloads 162 40 10