All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 185 169 3
PDF Downloads 44 42 1

Interpreting the Information in Ozone Observations and Model Predictions Relevant to Regulatory Policies in the Eastern United States

© Get Permissions
Full access

To study the underlying forcing mechanisms that distinguish the days with high ozone concentrations from average or nonepisodic days, the observed and model-predicted ozone time series are spectrally decomposed into different temporal components; the modeled values are based on the results of a three-month simulation with the Urban Airshed Model—Variable Grid Version photochemical modeling system. The ozone power spectrum is represented as the sum of four temporal components, ranging from the intraday timescale to the multiweek timescale. The results reveal that only those components that contain fluctuations with periods equal to or greater than one day carry the information that distinguishes ozone episode days from nonepisodic days. Which of the longer-term fluctuations is dominant in a particular episode varies from episode to episode. However, the magnitude of the intraday fluctuations is nearly invariant in time. The promulgation of the 8-h standard for ozone further emphasizes the importance of longer-term fluctuations embedded in ozone time series data. Furthermore, the results indicate that the regional photochemical modeling system is able to capture these features. This paper also examines the effect of simulation length on the predicted ozone reductions stemming from emission reductions. The results demonstrate that for regulatory purposes, model simulations need to cover longer time periods than just the duration of a single ozone episode; this is necessary not only to perform a meaningful model performance evaluation, but also to quantify the variability in the efficacy of an emission control strategy.

* Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.

+Department of Biometry and Statistics, School of Public Health, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, New York.

#Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Idaho Falls, Idaho.

Corresponding author address: Dr. S. T. Rao, Office of Science and Technology, Room 198, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233-3259. E-mail: strao@air.dec.state.ny.us

To study the underlying forcing mechanisms that distinguish the days with high ozone concentrations from average or nonepisodic days, the observed and model-predicted ozone time series are spectrally decomposed into different temporal components; the modeled values are based on the results of a three-month simulation with the Urban Airshed Model—Variable Grid Version photochemical modeling system. The ozone power spectrum is represented as the sum of four temporal components, ranging from the intraday timescale to the multiweek timescale. The results reveal that only those components that contain fluctuations with periods equal to or greater than one day carry the information that distinguishes ozone episode days from nonepisodic days. Which of the longer-term fluctuations is dominant in a particular episode varies from episode to episode. However, the magnitude of the intraday fluctuations is nearly invariant in time. The promulgation of the 8-h standard for ozone further emphasizes the importance of longer-term fluctuations embedded in ozone time series data. Furthermore, the results indicate that the regional photochemical modeling system is able to capture these features. This paper also examines the effect of simulation length on the predicted ozone reductions stemming from emission reductions. The results demonstrate that for regulatory purposes, model simulations need to cover longer time periods than just the duration of a single ozone episode; this is necessary not only to perform a meaningful model performance evaluation, but also to quantify the variability in the efficacy of an emission control strategy.

* Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York.

+Department of Biometry and Statistics, School of Public Health, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, New York.

#Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Idaho Falls, Idaho.

Corresponding author address: Dr. S. T. Rao, Office of Science and Technology, Room 198, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12233-3259. E-mail: strao@air.dec.state.ny.us
Save